Is there a difference between prison corruption and public corruption?
I think the first thing we have to do is define what corruption is, corruption is occasionally characterized as the exploitation of delegated authority for one’s personal advantage. Corruption is the exploitation of authority by a public official for personal achievement or any established codependent organization in which a portion of the organization is either not executing obligations it was primarily expected to, or carrying them out in an unethical way, to the impairment of the organization's fundamental goal. The misuse of public offices for personal benefit is customary of corruption. Corruption in the prison systems and public not only breaches the essential right to equality in the presence of the law but contradicts constitutional rights promised by the United States Constitution. An individual or system of government is in my opinion corrupt if they intentionally forfeit their primary responsibilities and morals to the point that they betray trust, deliberately defy a law, and per takes in actions that are unlawful or immoral. The perception of corruption has some bearing on the realness of corruption, and it can demoralize a society’s belief in the ethical capability of governmental guidance.
Corruption is Corruption
In my personal opinion I do not view public corruption and prison corruption as separate issues. I believe they are both the same mainly because public corruption comprises of a violation of public trust and/or exploitation of rank by federal, state, or local officials and their private sector affiliates which includes prions and their staff members All federal, state, or local officials and their private sector affiliates are required to place loyalty to the Constitution, the laws, and ethical principles above private gain, not using the public office for private gain, acting impartially towards private organizations and individuals....
Please join StudyMode to read the full document