Preview

The Devastation of Nuclear Weapons and Why They Should Cease to Exist

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
756 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Devastation of Nuclear Weapons and Why They Should Cease to Exist
Topic: The devastation of Nuclear Weapons and why they should cease to exist.
Specific Purpose: To persuade the audience that the use of Nuclear Weapons or WMD (weapons of mass destruction), should be eradicated for the safety and preservation of humanity and the world
Thesis Statement: America, and humanity as a whole, should agree to stop the use and creation of Nuclear weapons because of lessons learned through history, as well as logical and moral conclusions based on the facts surrounding them.
Introduction:
There is only one weapon of mankind to have been used only once before. Understandably warfare itself is a disturbing topic. The idea is men killing other men in the name of what’s right, except it’s never a choice on whose side you fight for. We are all born on some continent and wherever that happens to be will be our homeland to fight for. But war is inevitable, it will come because there will always be something to fight over, whether Religion, Justice, or Power, it will happen. Therefore it is necessary for a country to be prepared for war, consisting of soldier, guns, rifles, and an assortment of machines of war. These creations are grimly designed to kill another man, but and although bleak in imagining, their existence is understandable. What simply isn’t understandable though is one weapon of war that takes destruction to a whole other level. Where as the rifle kills one man with a bullet, this weapon decimates a city with a single detonation. Where as a rifle leaves behind a body to be mourned, this weapon leaves only the imprint of what used to be. Where as a rifle is focused on it’s objective and target, this weapon knows no boundaries, and has no moral compass upon which to judge whom to remove from this earth. WMD’s, The A-bomb, The Little boy, The Fat man, The Tsar Bomb, The Nuke. All these names are one thing, Nuclear Weapons. Weapons of Mass Destruction. Through History we’ve seen them, and today we fear them. As they continue to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As World War II was coming to an end during 1945, the creation of one of the most destructive weapons known to humanity occurred within the United States. This weapon, known as “the atomic bomb,” was used on the two Japanese cities: Hiroshima and Nagasaki, resulting in a death toll unprecedented by any military weapon used before and an immediate, unconditional surrender. Some historians believe President Truman decided to drop the atomic bomb in order to intimidate the Soviet Union whereas others believe it was a strictly military measure designed to force Japan’s unconditional surrender. In the Report of a Scientific Panel of nuclear physicists, some scientific colleagues believed the atomic bomb was a “purely technical demonstration” to induce surrender. Other scientists believed that the use of the atomic bomb will improve international prospects in that they are more concerned with the prevention of war than with the elimination of this special weapon (Doc G). Thus, the United States dropped the atomic bomb to both force Japan’s unconditional surrender and to intimidate the Soviet Union.…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout history, war has been constantly evolving. Over time, it has taken a new less glorious form. World War One was one of the most devastating and transformative events in human history. In Erich Maria Remarque’s book, All Quiet on the Western Front, he depicts the horrors of “the great war” by showing the complete disregard for human life in modern warfare. This war modeled the way that any future war would be fought. It would shape human history by completely changing the game of warfare and people’s opinions of it. Remarque shows, from his point of view, the terrors that happen on a daily basis on the front lines, and away from it, of World War One. World War One changed the perception of war in a big way and opened the eyes of so many people to the horrors of modern warfare.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    I clearly recognize that defensive systems have limitations and raise certain problems and ambiguities. If paired with offensive systems, they can be viewed as fostering an aggressive policy, and no one wants that. But with these considerations firmly in mind, I call upon the scientific community in our country, those who gave us nuclear weapons, to turn their great talents now to the cause of mankind and world peace, to give us the means of rendering these nuclear weapons impotent and obsolete.…

    • 5226 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    This juggernaut of war has crushed millions of humankind. Its savagery and decadence is consummate. Such butchery has patently marked all the wars of this century and before. This cannibalization of mankind on its own is unparalleled. Scenes of human massacre that few persons would believe will be imprinted perpetually in the minds of the combatants. Many of those who experience the immoral, offensive and degrading trauma of war can be physically and psychologically scared indefinitely. Their sense of what is right and wrong is in constant conflict. The tragedy of war and incomprehensible death will change whoever you thought you were and whatever you think you will become when you encounter…

    • 3663 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Men screeched as a storm of missiles rained through the sky. I had seen this all before. Too many times for me to remember, it really wasn’t my job to remember. Humans never learned. They were proud, foolish, volatile creatures. And at what price? I would never understand the things people valued over life. They had far more to lose than they ever had to gain. The outcome is always the same of course, no one has ever won war and no one ever will. Well, except for me.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The modern era of this day and age is under constant threat from new and expanding methods of conflict that is devastating our already deteriorating society- often segregated between the rich and the poor. Due to the steady increase of communication and travel, there is a correlation with the increase amount of fighting with age old ethnic rivalries and religious strife along with disputes over territory, resources and morals. However, with the considerable advancements in technology presented over the last century, the effects and devastation are more vast and noteworthy. Prior instances being the innovation of the Maxim Machine gun in the nineteenth century that took the lives of millions of people in World War I, the bringer of the war of…

    • 1599 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Millions killed in nuclear disaster, thousands left homeless, countries left in peril! These are some of the many consequences that are faced in a nuclear dependent world. Day after day people live in fear that one tiny mistake, one wrong word can cripple our world and leave the survivors living in rubble. The world has discovered that despite the enormous precautions taken, disasters and destruction still constantly resurface themselves through our short, but eventful nuclear history. During World War II, Albert Einstein sent a letter to President Dwight Eisenhower that has shaped mankind from that moment on. It described a weapon that would release enough energy to destroy an entire city("USA weapons of mass destruction." ). Now nearly four score ago the consequences we face for this technology has been detrimental to our society. Scientific discoveries also yielded the idea of using this extraordinary power as an energy source and a extraordinary threat.Due to these undeniable risks, the world needs to remove all sources of nuclear weaponry and power.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Iran's Nuclear Program

    • 1439 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “Now I am become death, the destroyer of worlds,” (Oppenheimer, 1965, 0:47). So said Julius Robert Oppenheimer, one of the men credited with creating the atomic bomb, when describing the first test detonation of a nuclear weapon on July 16, 1945, at the Alamogordo Bomb Range in New Mexico ( Sublette, 1999), as he quotes the Hindu holy text, the Bhagavad Vita. Nuclear weapons have only been used in warfare twice, both times by the United States during World War I, when the United States dropped the ‘Fat Man’ and ‘Little Boy’ bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August, 1945 (Sublette, 1999). In the 60 intervening years, a number of other nations have since developed nuclear weapons of their own. Because of nuclear proliferation, and the unparalleled destructive power of atomic weapons, nuclear non-proliferation has become an international concern, with the United States leading the charge. The past decade, however, has seen new nations try to enter the ‘nuclear club’ the most recent country being Iran. A nuclear armed Iran poses many concerns to the United States. In this paper, I will discuss the history of Iran’s nuclear program, what steps have been taken to curb the Iranians efforts, and where the two major political parties of the United States stand on the issue.…

    • 1439 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Analyze the history of weapons of mass destruction (WMD), biological weapons, chemical weapons, and nuclear weapons and the future threat of WMD.…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, Nuclear Weapons have strong mass destruction. For example, The United States sent "Little boy", a uranium gun-type fission bomb to Hiroshima, Japan. 3 days Later, The United States sent " Fat Man" in Nagasaki, Japan. More than 10,000 people died from these incidents. In my opinion, Nuclear Weapons didn't kill just people, but their family, their home and their dream.…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Dwight D

    • 1281 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Part of Eisenhower’s message was to educate the audience, in this case the American citizens. But also, Eisenhower hoped to ease the fear the Americans had about nuclear warfare. Eisenhower eases the fear of the Americans by stating, “The United States knows that peaceful power from atomic energy is no dream of the future. The capability,already proved, is here today.” He explains that the uses of nuclear weapons will be to promote peace rather then using it to simply kill. As the rhetor, Eisenhower clearly explains the message of promoting the use of nuclear weaponry for peaceful acts and as a defensive tactic against the other countries building up their nuclear weapons.…

    • 1281 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    My partner and I stand in firm affirmation of the following resolution. Resolved: Unilateral military force by the united states is justified to prevent nuclear proliferation. I would like to share various definitions with you before I continue. According to the Merriam Webster dictionary, Justified-having done for, or marked with a good legitimate reason. Prevent-to hold keep back. Nuclear proliferation is the increase in number; multiply weapons that run and emite nuclear energy. Now, I will prove this assertion through the following contentions; The United States Government is obliged to protect its citizens and itself from threats of nuclear proliferation, The United States Government is best positioned to take military action, as well as Unilateral action is justified to assure maximum protection from terrorism and political inconsistent reigns.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Whether one concludes a positive or negative answer to this question the argumentation would benefit if emanating from Kenneth Waltz reasoning, that in 1981 provoked a debate that until this day is engaging scholars and strategists. Waltz’s positive answer to the question stood, and stands, in sharp contrast to the general public understanding that proliferation of nuclear weapons is dangerous and undesirable. The classical debate that Waltz initiated has been focused on whether nuclear weapons create stability or not. Many scholars have acknowledged the need to broaden the focus and taking other factor into account, for example implications nuclear weapons have for economy or environment (Knopf 2004: 42-43). Because of the limit of this paper I will build my argument within the scope of the classical debate in order to answer the question.…

    • 1906 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The term Weapons of Mass Destruction has two indications. In its broader, literal sense, it is used to refer to weapons whose destructive power far surpasses that of guns or conventional explosives. However, the term is more often used in a narrower sense, to refer specifically to nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons. Since the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, which raised awareness of America’s vulnerability, the United States has greatly intensified its efforts to stop the spread of nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons. When the president and other officials refer to “weapons of mass destruction,” they usually mean NBC weaponry. An organism or toxin found in nature is used in them that is meant to kill or incapacitate an enemy. Though there are different types and they are made up of different ingredients, they are all meant to kill and do significant destruction. The United States Military refers to them as "weapons that are capable of high order destruction and being used to destroy large numbers of people." Many countries posses weapons of mass destruction for one main cause. Because they "generate a culture of fear", they are held in reserve by countries as a scare tactic. They are set aside to be used as a threat, if another country were to use them, they would in turn be bombed with weapons of mass destruction. During the Cold War, the term "weapons of mass destruction" was primarily a reference to nuclear weapons. At the time, in the West the euphemism "strategic weapons" was used to refer to the American nuclear arsenal, which was presented as a necessary deterrent against nuclear or conventional attack from the Soviet Union.The term "weapons of mass destruction" continued to see periodic use throughout this time, usually in the context of nuclear arms control; Ronald Reagan used it during the 1986 Reykjavík Summit, when referring to the 1967 Outer Space Treaty. Reagan's successor, George H.W. Bush, used the term in an 1989 speech to the…

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    nuclear weapon

    • 742 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In their advisory opinion in July 1996 the International Court of Justice stated that “the threat or use of nuclear weapons would generally be contrary to the rules of international law applicable in armed conflict, and in particular the principles and rules humanitarian law”. Since the use of nuclear weapons is generally considered to be illegal, their overall utility is questionable. So in order to delegitimise nuclear weapons, there is a critical need to change the perception of their role and utility: from a position in which they occupied a central strategic place to one in which their role is seen as wholly unnecessary as well as undesirable. To be successful in this task other actors that are not bound to a specific state’s security polices are of utmost importance, they can bring new ideas to the table and keep the discussion focused on the topic at hand. It all comes down to nuclear weapons not being very useful in today’s world and the upholding of these weapons increasing the danger of them being used and thus causing devastation.…

    • 742 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics