Citations: http://www.hrc.org/laws-and-legislation/federal-legislation/respect-for-marriage-act?gclid=CPKnzqXWwrYCFRFt6wodCi8AEA - This site profoundly represents what the DOMA act truly stands for and represents by stating that legally married couples of the same sex do not have the same marital rights that a man and a woman would have. http://www.glaad.org/resources/doma - This site states when the law was represented and the then president who passed it into law (Bill Clinton) and also it’s sole purpose. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2013/03/28/raw-politics-explains-why-doma-got-wide-support-in-1996/ - This site states how and why the DOMA act got so much support to be passed in 1996. http://theweek.com/article/index/240945/4-signs-that-doma-is-doomed - States that same sex marriage cannot receive the same federal benefits as other couples. http://www.policymic.com/articles/30069/doma-10-billion-waste-threatens-conservative-movement-s-survival - The law thoroughly states how conservative republicans thought that by passing this law they’d gain univeral American support to help them in elections. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/waymon-hudson/over-70-major-companies-f_b_1080485.html - This website displays the companies that are against the DOMA act.
The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is a law that was formed in 1996 by Congress, and was signed into law by then president Bill Clinton sought to be enforced by the Supreme Court that defines marriage as a union between a man and a woman. Traditionally, marriage is defined as a lifelong union between a man and a woman at the pinnacle of their life’s down until their final years. And the purpose of DOMA is to protect that sense of unionship in the United States and rather preserve it than destroy it.
DOMA is a tricky subject. What I would like to learn about this subject is who backs this clause with full support and effort and who is absolutely against it. Although, as I’ve researched and...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document