The Chiefiest Mourner
Explain the title. In what way is it suitable to the story?
For me, the author choose the “Chieftest Mourner” as the title of the story because the story shows who suffered most between the legal wife, Sophia and the second wife, Esa.
What did the predominant element in the story-plot, theme, character, and setting? Explain?
Theme because in this part, we can able to know who is really the mourner between the two wives of the poet. For which they are arguing who is the one who will be with the dead body of the poet. The poet clan together with his legal wife wants to have a peaceful burial for the poet so they want Esa to get away but She insist for she is the one who are there to take care the poet when he is ill.
Who is the single main character about whom the story centers? Describe?
Esa, the Second wife. As for the narrator, the poets niece, She is Young, Accomplished, A Woman of Means. But for me the I understand the story, the Esa reflects to me, she is Kind, had long Patience and with a low Pride. The poets clan said that she is so scandalous but for me, she is not For she’s only Fighting for her right not as his wife but the chance to be with the poet’s grave for she plays a big role in his life when he’s ill.
What sort of conflict confronts the leading character or characters? Explain
For me, the Leading character is Esa, the second wife Her conflict is that she can’t able to be with the poet’s grave for he’s family doesn’t want her to be there in the honor of the poet’s burial. Despite all her Sacrifice, they don’t want her to be there. So, as being Kind-hearted and Low-pride, she leaved silently, crying alone, and let everything be handled by his legal family.
How is the conflict resolved?
For me, the conflict resolved here is about the one who will remain beside the poet’s grave, either the legal, Sophia, or the second wife, Esa. And to stop the Argument, Esa the second wife, leave the burial, crying solemly, mourning and set aside all her sacrifices for the poet.
How does the author handle characterization? Justify
She didn’t pay much attention at this kind of characterization. She only describe the Esa, the second wife, in simple way. No further description. May be she want us, the reader to know who or what the character is based on how we understand the story.
Conversation of the character?
I like the character way she used conversation to reflect who the character really is. The way they talk, the way they mingle to other. The way they argue to the other one. We can much know what the character is here in the story.
Actions of the characters?
The author can show to the reader more clearly what and who the character really is. Based on their action, we can know them well which is not clear just in a simple conversation.
Combination of these methods?
In this kind of characterization, we can therefore conclude and clarify who and what the character really is. We can able to know who they are in the story and what role they are holding. Through this characterization, the way they talk the way they act, we can therefore know who really the chieftest mourner is. If it is either Sophia or Esa.
Who tells the story? What point of view is used? Explain
For me, the first person is the one who tells the story. In this story, she points out who is the chieftest mourner is. She point out this through the way the characters talk and act.
Where does the primary action takes place? Explain?
For me, the first action is in the hotel where the narrator the first person, the Poet’s niece was sent by her aunt, Sophia, the poet’s legal wife. I conclude that this was where the first action takes place for the poet move here and never come back to Sophia. Sophia didn’t came of this as she didn’t visit or talked to fix or solve their problem. In here, I think the poet decided, since her legal wife...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document