Preview

The Axis of Evil vs. Evil Empire

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
716 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Axis of Evil vs. Evil Empire
The phrases “Evil Empire” by Ronald Reagan, and “Axis of Evil” by George w. Bush where phrases used by both presidents to point targets that were dangerous or a threat to the world; such as the soviet union or Iran developing nuclear weapons among with Iraq and north Korea. Both of these speeches were pointing out the “bad guys of the world” as in intending to keep the peace, but it was also a way that the United States Military forces could take action and start a conflict against the “bad guys”.
In 1983 Ronald Reagan predicted the end of the Soviet Union, and he describes the socialist state as “the focus of evil in the modern world” because of its military capabilities. The Soviet Union was under great difficulties in the late 1970’s and early 1980’s. Bloated military budget, social problems, and economic stagnation where the main issues among others. In January 29 2002 President George W. Bush gave the term “axis of evil” to the countries of Iraq, Iran and North Korea. These countries were portrayed by George W. Bush during the State of the Union as possessing nuclear weapons; the axis of evil was condemned as a totalitarian regime who was stockpiling weapons of mass destruction. Bush lambasted these countries for denying their people’s freedom, rejecting international inspections, and cultivating nerve gas and anthrax.
The two speeches have similar ideas despite the different eras, both of them speak about countries or organizations that are considered potential treats, they make them look like evil forces with potential destruction forces upon the people of the United States and the world. In Ronald Reagan the speech is trying to come to a peacefully understanding with the communists, and in George W. Bush speech provides more evidence against the enemies and declares that the war against terror is just getting started. Both of the speeches “excuse” the United States Military to take immediate actions against those evil forces. Some differences could be

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    HIS 301 Week 4 Summary

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages

    · 2 to 3 slides:Summary of how international affairs of the 1980s contributed to the collapse of communism in Eastern Europe and the end of the Cold War…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    It is that Ronald Reagan did not have a firm grasp of world issues, history, or geography. When Reagan told French president Fran `cois Mitterrand, a socialist, that communism and socialism were the same, Mitterrand wondered, “what planet is that man living on?” Superficial and often mistaken about elementary facts, Reagan acted more on instinct that on analysis. Expressing the reformist message to common in U.S. foreign policy, he liked to quote Tom Paine of the American Revolution; “we have it in out power to begin the world over again,” Reagan stated that the Soviet Union was an “evil empire,” that would “ commit any crime,” “lie” and “cheat” to achieve a communist world. Because he attributed Third World disorders to Soviet intrigue, the president declared the Reagan Doctrine; the United States would openly support anticommunist movements, “freedom fighters” wherever they were battling the Soviets or Soviet backed governments. Under this doctrine, The CIA funneled aid to insurgents in Afghanistan, Nicaragua, Angola, and elsewhere. In open defiance of the sovereignty of those nations, Reagan worked to overthrow their governments.…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the end of the Brejnev era , the socialist bloc was severely outdated and far removed from the contemporary world. The economy was in a shambles, independent civil society was largely in exile, and corruption throughout and within the state via the Communist Party had become legendary. In addition, the USSR had to devote an enormous portion of its budget to the military. On the international level, the USSR had lost many allies, because its social model proved to be decreasingly successful in its deceit, and the ill-fated invasion of Afghanistan (1979 - 1989) did not help in any way. It was therefore necessary to undertake urgent measures, especially in countries where satellite totalitarian regimes were challenged and the USSR no longer had the support of local communist parties.…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reagan's Tragic Hero

    • 173 Words
    • 1 Page

    In many ways, Reagan was a hard line, rigid ideologue, a man who truly believed that the USSR was so evil, it had to be confronted in Europe even at the possible risk of an all out nuclear exchange. He brought the world to the brink of an all out nuclear war in 1983. Very few people today know or realize just how close we came to Armageddon.…

    • 173 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his “Evil Empire” speech, Reagan organizes and structures his debate using various rhetorical devices in order to depict the Soviet Union as an enemy of the United States.…

    • 917 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Throughout its history, the United States has consistently illustrated valiant efforts to circumvent powers of evil, as well as mistakes that the US must learn from to prevent themselves from being deceived by enemies, both foreign and domestic. For example, during the Cold War, the United States wanted to “contain” communism to the regimes that had initially declared it as their standard of government, which is why the United States pleaded to the United Nations to intervene in the Korean War. Initially the United States was only to intervene under the containment doctrine which provided a limit as to how far the United States could push the North Korean forces back (which would be back to the 38th parallel, the initial border). Under these…

    • 2575 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is the term by which President Bush refers to North Korea, Iraq, and Iran; he uses this term so people will associate these countries with "evil". He is giving enemies a name that makes them look worse to the public.…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    President Reagan

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages

    During his Presidency, Reagan was faced with many foreign matters, such as the ending of the Cold War, the 1986 bombing of Libya, and the shock of the Iran-Contra affair. He publicly described the Soviet Union as an "evil empire” and supported anti-communist movements worldwide while spending his first term forgoing the strategy of détente, by ordering a massive military buildup in an arms race with the USSR. Under a policy that came to be known as the Reagan Doctrine, Reagan and his administration also provided overt and covert aid to anti-communist resistance movements in an effort to "rollback" Soviet-backed communist governments in Africa, Asia, and Latin America.…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cold War Containment

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Coming out of a post-World War II the relationship and tensions between America and the Soviet Union lasted for most of the second half of the twentieth century. This so-called war, heightened suspicions, creating a series of international events that brought the world’s two superpowers down to the brink of destruction.…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Reagan and Bush Years

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Reagan’s “Evil Empire” was a speech that was given on June 8, 1982. Even though Reagan did not use the term “evil empire,” he was describing the collapse of global communism as inevitable. Within Reagan’s speech, he talks about how other societies had communism and how they all failed at it. Reagan talks about how historians study the rise and fall of communism and what exactly happened with each of these societies and how the government reacted. While describing how communism was falling in these societies, he was also telling the United States why our country should not follow in these other societies footsteps and go to communism. If Reagan did not tell the American people about communism, then maybe, just maybe, would America be a communist country today. We probably would not have all of the freedoms that we have today and we probably would not be able to have the privileges that we have as a country. Our military may also not be as strong as it is and that would make America look like a very weak country and from that, we would probably have a lot of countries coming after us and trying to take us over.…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It has only been a little more than a decade since the grave events of September 11, 2001, a tragic day forever marked in America’s history. The attack on the World Trade Center was a pivotal occasion that began the crisis that is the United State’s moral and political ambiguity of the 21st century. This has been a decade of vague and changing policy when looking at international affairs. From the power change in the Pentagon to the transition of circumstances across the globe, the years following the 9/11 attacks have emphasized the point of stance that Jack Snyder has taken in his “One World, Rival Theories.” Black and white cease to exist when foreign policy ideologies are put to practice; the theories are bent and blended to suit the present…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Many presidents of the United States of America have constructed doctrines during their terms in office that have come to define their foreign policy aims, from James Monroe in 1823 right up until the very recent Bush Doctrine. This essay will focus on three of these doctrines, namely the Monroe Doctrine of 1823, the Truman Doctrine of 1947 and the Reagan Doctrine of 1984. Although there are many other presidential doctrines in the history of American foreign policy, several of these, such as Polk’s doctrine in 1845 and the Eisenhower Doctrine of 1957, appear to simply be reiterations of previous presidential doctrines. We will see that, although rhetoric is used quite freely in the president’s announcements of their doctrines, it would be wide of the mark to argue that the doctrines themselves are merely rhetoric. Instead should become clear that the doctrines shaped American foreign policy not only during the doctrine’s author’s term in office, but also for many of his successors.…

    • 4124 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The end of WWII left the United States and the Soviet Union as the two dominant world powers, and they soon became locked in a “cold war” confrontation. The Cold War spread from Europe to become a global ideological conflict between democracy and communism. Among its effects were a nasty hot war in Korea and a domestic crusade against “disloyalty.”…

    • 4151 Words
    • 119 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    The Reagan Doctrine

    • 1078 Words
    • 5 Pages

    As Ronald Reagan came into office, he was considered apprehensive of the Soviet Union. Throughout his presidency, he remained centered on the perceived threat to the safety and security of the United States from the Soviet Union and its Communist system. President Reagan rejected how most leaders in Washington perceived the cold war and how it should be handled. First of all, he viewed communism as something that needed to vanish completely because of its inhumane treatment that border-lined insanity. The current plan was to try to “coexist” with the Soviet threat, but Reagan felt that the threat should be conquered. Secondly, Reagan believed that the United States needed unquestionable military strength. He excluded the ideas of having weapons treaties with the Soviets. In his opinion, peace was only attainable by making America stronger than its enemies. Lastly, Reagan went against traditional thinking with the Strategic Defense Initiative. He knew that the only defense against a nuclear attack from the Soviets was to make that attack useless (Dunn 21). Through all of this, one of the effects became the Reagan Doctrine.…

    • 1078 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Was the Cold War Inevitable

    • 2933 Words
    • 12 Pages

    The orthodox view of the Cold War elucidates its inevitability due to the great ideological differences that existed between the Soviet Union and United States. On the other hand, the revisionists argued that it happened due to the actions that Soviets took and the consequential responses made by the United States as a result of their inflexible, single-sided interpretations of Soviet action. Yet, even with the backdrop of the early Bolshevik conflict in 1918 as well as the great ideological gulf between the Soviet Union and United states, the cold war could have been avoided in its initial stages under President Roosevelt. However, what really determined it was the series of events that occurred after Roosevelt was succeeded by Truman. The inevitability of the Cold War, at its roots, was due to Soviet aggression and attitudes felt by the United States which was exacerbated from the post war climate of the time. To be precise, it was a combination of the subsequent events that followed Truman’s accession that sealed the unavoidability of the Cold War. American diplomatic policies were dictated by their fears of communism as well as opportunities that arise from modern warfare which aided in the evolution of American foreign policies. In the end, the Cold War was inevitable as a result of the conflict of interest between nations, whether it be the ideological gulf between communism and capitalism or the determining the political future of Eastern Europe, which was ultimately fuelled by the unstable post World War II environment.…

    • 2933 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays