Although Truman made the final decision in the dropping of the bombs he had many other leaders around him giving him feedback on the situation, what they thought would be the best decision, and things he needed to consider before the ultimate bombing happened. Truman writes in his journal the night before meeting with his committee on June 18, 1945, “I have to decide Japanese strategy—shall we invade Japan proper or shall we bomb and blockade? That is my hardest decision to date. But I’ll make it when I have all the facts.”(Maddox,1995). The bomb was going to have many affects and there were going to be both arguments for and against its use both of which Truman had to take in serious consideration. Truman himself said “it was the most terrible thing ever discovered”, (Nathan,2012) which is exactly why he didn’t take this matter lightly. Just before ending the meeting, which was going to result in the invasion Kyushu, McCloy (one of the Joint Chiefs) stated that they could avoid invasion if they warned Japan of their use of Atomic Weaponry (Maddox, 1995).
America’s original plan as of June 1945 was to conduct an Operational Downfall, which was code for the Invasion of Japan but by the time the plan was ready Japan would have enough time to plan their defense against the U.S. In early August the intercepts indicated 13 Japanese divisions defending the invasion beaches. One intelligence officer noted that the U.S would be attacking on a ratio of one-to-one -- "not the recipe for victory”(American Experience). Taking this route Truman received estimates from General MacArthur and Joint Chiefs that this could cause up to 2 million deaths by the time it was over (Nathan, 2012). This operation was too high of a risk for U.S Soldiers (Nathan, 2012). At this time it was time to take the atomic bomb and other alternatives into consideration. The Interim Committee discussed using air power to defeat Japan, General MacArthur felt Japan would surrender within six months with little risk to Americans (Nathan, 2012). Six months was to long Truman wanted the war to end as soon as possible, and this operation would take to long. Another alternative to the Japanese surrendering was letting the Japanese keep their Emperor at throne. But Byrne’s being the new Secretary of State Argued with Truman over this option, “Byrnes argued that the President would be crucified politically by the Republicans for “making a deal” with the Japanese (Barnes, 2013). The third alternative taken into consideration was waiting for the Soviets to invade Japan. This was an important objective because this was something President Roosevelt had earlier negotiated (Nathan, 2012).
Considering the Soviets was strategic because of their control over most of Eastern Europe’s Military (Nathan, 1995). In actuality this alternative had already happened when the Soviet Union invaded Japan from the north after the first bomb was dropped. Historian Tsuyoshi argues that it wasn’t until the Soviet invasion that the Emperor “was finally convinced that the moment had at last arrived to end the war” (Barnes, 1995). But this hadn’t meant it was going to happen, it meant that it was going to make it easier. Some Historians say the Soviet Union was the reason Japan Surrender in the end, not because of the bombs (Barnes, 1995). This alternative wasn’t certain to President Truman, which is why this option was not chosen.
Japan knew all along they were going to be defeated by the Americans, but they weren’t giving up. Japan was weak, they were tired as was the U.S. Japan held their ground and were going to fight till they couldn’t. But why, why would they continue to fight if they knew they were going to lose? Research tells Japan tried multiple times to surrender but none of the options were good enough for the U.S to act upon(Cook, 2011). After the First Bomb was dropped the Japanese were in a meeting discussing the surrendering to the U.S when the second bomb was dropped on Nagasaki. At this point Japan was forced to surrender unconditionally (Cook,2011).
Truman had many arguments in using the bomb. He wanted to win the war and for it come to an end at its lowest cost. Truman wanted to justify the Manhattan Project; the U.S estimated putting two million dollars into this secret project. Truman argued why not use the bomb? Weapons are used for war and it wasn’t the first time a bombing on civilians had occurred. “An earlier U.S firebombing campaign of Japan, which began on 1944, killed an estimated 315,922 Japanese” (Nathan, 2012). Truman was questioned by a General by the use of the bomb and responded with reminding him of Pearl Harbor and how this would be in response, he said “when you have to deal with a beast you have to treat him as a beast”(Nathan, 2012). These bombs were going to end the war sooner rather than later and cause less deaths than the invasion was estimated to.
The First Bomb was dropped August 6, 1945 killing 130,000 Japanese and the second was dropped three days later August 9,1945 killing 60-70,000 more Japanese. Six days later Japan surrender ending World War II (Nathan,2012). Truman’s decision to drop the second bomb was based solely upon the fact that one bomb would not be sufficient. “American officials believed more than one bomb would be necessary because they assumed Japanese hard-liners would minimize the first explosion or attempt to explain it away as some sort of natural catastrophe, precisely what they did” (Maddox, 1995). Truman claimed that using atomic bombs prevented an invasion that would have cost 500,000 American lives. Other officials mentioned the same or even higher figures (Maddox, 1995). He also stated using the bombs saved Japanese lives (Barnes, 2013).
Truman’s decision to use the Atomic Bomb will always be controversial because of his alternatives but at this time in 1945 he made the decision and ending the war as soon as possible with the least amount of deaths was his ultimatum (Maddox, 1995). This topic will be debated upon for decades as it has been the last 68 years but the one thing that will forever be true is that this bombing ended the deadliest conflict in human history (Cook, 2011).
Work Cited
"American Experience: TV 's Most-watched History Series." PBS. PBS, n.d. Web. June 2013.
Barnes, Michael. "The Decision to Use the Atomic Bomb: Arguments Against." The Decision to Use the Atomic Bomb: Arguments Against. N.p., Jan. 2013. Web. June 2013.
Cook, Gareth. "Why Did Japan Surrender?" Boston Globe. N.p., 7 Aug. 2011. Web.
Donohue, Nathan. "Understanding the Decision to Drop the Bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki." Center for Strategic and International Studies. N.p., 10 Aug. 2012
. Web. June 2013.
Maddox, Robert J. "American Heritage." The Biggest Decision: Why We Had To Drop The Atomic Bomb. N.p., June 1995. Web. June 2013
Cited: Cook, Gareth. "Why Did Japan Surrender?" Boston Globe. N.p., 7 Aug. 2011. Web.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
The decision to drop two atomic bombs on Japan in August of 1945 was made by a complex group of technological, political and military influences. History has it that the bombs were dropped in order to save American lives by avoiding the invasion of Japanese homelands, at least, that was what President Truman told the American public at the time. “For years, this simple view has been challenged by a seemingly more sophisticated academic perspective that the bombs were wrongfully used against innocent civilians, did not genuinely factor into the surrender of Japan, and would have better served the war effort as part of a diplomatic “carrot and stick” package.” (Beason 1). Some argue that the first bomb may have been required to achieve Japanese surrender, but the second one was a needless act of barbarism. According to Admiral William D. Leahy, the President’s Chief of Staff, “The use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war over Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender…” (Beason 1). However, I have many facts to counteract all of these criticisms and to support President Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb.…
- 1290 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
One can argue that the dropping of the atomic bomb by the United States was strictly a military measure designed to force Japan’s unconditional surrender. First, as stated in the Memoirs of Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson, Japan was willing to literally “fight to the death” and the war was guaranteed to be prolonged for many months against the Japanese. Many more millions of American casualties were bound to happen and the U.S. wasn’t willing to risk all those lives. Because of this unwillingness to surrender, both Truman and Americans found it strenuous to figure out a way to end the war quicker. Charging into Japan or bombing Japanese cities with regular bombs would take up too much time and the number of casualties would only increase. Therefore, having the decision to use an atomic bomb to blow an entire city up within seconds, Truman undoubtedly ordered…
- 949 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Probably no other man-made object has wielded as much terror or destruction as the Atomic Bomb. Created, tested, and used during World War II, it brought about the end of that bloody conflict. Unfortunately, it also was the cause of much loss in human life. However, why it was created, creation, and use are very interesting, although somewhat sad, and offer many topics for study.…
- 971 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Harry Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb was a good decision. If he had not decided to drop the atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the war would have continued and more Americans, as well as Japanese, would have continued to die. Since the Japanese were using ruthless methods of war like kamikazes or killing themselves rather than be captured, it was hard to tell how far Japan was willing to go in order to win the war. Thus, Truman’s decision to bomb Japan is justifiable by the cause of not knowing to what extents Japan was willing to go. I believe Truman wanted to show the Japanese that the United States was willing to do anything to win the…
- 125 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
On August 6th, 1945, the United States dropped the first ever Atomic weapon on Hiroshima, Japan. 140,000 people lost their lives, most of which were civilians. President Truman was in charge of this major decision, and he made the correct choice. The alternative solutions were much too costly for the United States, both in expenses and American casualties. Another reason Truman’s decision is justified was due to the declination of the fair ultimatum recieved by Japan. Also it was important to the well being of the world to keep the Soviets out of Japan. Dropping the Atomic Bomb was the most reliable and definite way to end the war.…
- 498 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
In August of 1945, the United States launched two atomic bombs on Japan; the first, in Hiroshima on August 6, and the second in Nagasaki a few days later. Despite the obvious diplomatic advantage to implementing one of the most intimidating weapons of that time, the United States’ tactics and goals behind dropping the atomic bombs were purely military oriented; the political benefit was merely an added bonus. The atomic bomb was necessary due to the Japanese’s refusal to surrender and the hundreds of thousands of lives at stake.…
- 639 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The use of the atomic bomb remains controversial to this day. There are academics and policy makers of the time that still disagree on the whether it was justifiable to destroy Hiroshima and Nagasaki. They debate if it truly was in the interest of ending the war sooner and with less loss of life. Several issues played together to help form the opinion that Truman acted for more nefarious purposes. Domestic as well as international politics is said to have played a role in the decision of Truman to go ahead with the use of the atomic bomb . Would the Japanese have been willing to surrender without the dropping of the bomb? Some experts believe that because Japanese representatives were talking to the Russians about being…
- 1794 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
President Harry S. Truman decision to drop atomic bombs on Japan is perhaps the most controversial act of policy in United States history. One of the many different reasons given for the use of this weapon was the shock effect it would produce in the Japanese foreign policy circle. While the shock of the Japanese will be discussed later, it is important to note that it had a similar effect on the west. This shock effect has caused countless authors to speculate as to the motivation behind, and effects of this revolutionary weapon.…
- 5419 Words
- 22 Pages
Better Essays -
“On August 16, 1945, Enola Gray, a U.S. bomber, dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima, Japan, and three days later, a second atomic bomb destroyed the city of Nagasaki” (Hiroshima and Nagasaki). Many people argue whether or not these bombings were ethical and legal. The U.S. killed innocent people in order to “break the morale” of the Japanese population. The U.S. also broke many of the statements in the “Just War” doctrine. Theses bombings caused many people to face harmful amounts of radiation and die. I believe that President Harry S. Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bombs was unethical and he did not justify using nuclear weapons in order to get Japan to surrender.…
- 567 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Please use the website at the bottom to research the Seattle Times article. This will help you answer the questions below. You can type your answers in the textbox for the virtual tour or save your answers in a word document and upload it into the assignment.…
- 359 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Despite its destructive consequences, the American bombing of Hiroshima was necessary to put an end to the war in the Pacific. President Truman’s choice to release a nuclear weapon on Japan was the fastest solution to ending the United States’ involvement in the Second World War, making the decision the most time efficient way out. Hiroshima’s destruction was also, very possibly, the only way for the United States to win the war, because the Japanese were very clear that they were prepared to fight until they were down to their last man. The Japanese military was the strongest in the world, so ending the war with a bang was much more appealing to Americans and the Truman Administration than fighting until there was no one left to fight. Perhaps most importantly, the dropping of the atomic bomb saved the lives of millions of American soldiers and civilians, as well as Japanese soldiers and civilians. This made it not only the quickest way to bring the soldiers home and ensure the United States’ victory, but also the best way to reduce the lives lost on both sides. The Truman Administration’s decision to drop a nuclear bomb on the Japanese was horrific, but necessary in bringing about a cost-effective, Japanese surrender that saved more lives than it took away.…
- 1158 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
On the 6th of August 1945 the first atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, Japan killing 70,000 citizens instantly and a further 10,000 perished from burns and radiation sickness1. President Harry Truman was wrong to drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima, Japan. One of his reasons for dropping the bomb was to end an ongoing war; his reason behind this was that to end the war in such a way would cease anymore-continuous damage2. Although this shows good intentions he did not decrease any damage in anyway and was in fact being quite selfish. The only damage that was ceased was the damage being put upon the United States which can be argued that as he was the president, was right to be only protecting his own country. He had many ideas put forth that were far less damaging. A few of the ideas put forward were to invade Japanese mainland, hold a demonstration of the destructive power of the atomic bomb for Japanese dignitaries, bomb and blockade the islands, wait for the Soviet Union to enter the war on August 15th or to compromise peace. He did not give any of these ideas a chance to go through with them. I believe he did not wait for the Soviet Union to enter and wanted to drop the atomic bomb as a warning to them, he wanted them to see how powerful the United States was and was not to be messed with. Ethically what he did was wrong, not only had Hiroshima become inhabitable for years after but also people affected by the radiation were to be affecting generations to come. Miscarriages, stillbirths and birth defect rates were increasing significantly, many children were born with mental disabilities, stunted growth or a condition called microcephaly where their heads were unusually small3. Before giving the order to drop the bomb he did not have tests carried out to see the extent of radiation sickness the bomb could cause and had no idea of how far the…
- 946 Words
- 3 Pages
Powerful Essays -
In 1945 Harry S. Truman decided to use the atomic bomb not only once, but twice to finish World War Two. The first bomb that was dropped on Hiroshima August, 6th killed upwards to around 80,000 people and the second bomb dropped on Nagasaki August, 14th killed 40,000 people. The controversy of the atomic bomb is because of the amount of innocent people that were killed in Japan. Nobody will ever know the outcome of the war if we never dropped the bomb, but we do know that the war was ended because of it. Over 100,000 people lost their lives because of these bombs, but how many lives would have been lost if we never dropped them? That is the other question that can never be answered, but based…
- 534 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
When President Harry Truman made the decision to drop the first ever atomic bomb, did he saves lives or did he create a whole new Pandora's box that we would continue to struggle with today? After gathering facts and meeting with our Allies such as the Soviet Union, he believed that dropping the atomic bomb would make the Japanese surrender quickly saving lives in the long run. There were many factors that went into the decision that President Truman made. After the bloody battles of Iwo Jima and Okinawa, American soldiers and the American government realized that the Japanese would fight to the end. They did not believe they were "beaten" but they believed they were luring the American troops to their turf where they could fight a better battle in their rugged terrain.…
- 995 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
After considering the pros and cons of the use of nuclear weapons I believe that President Truman and the U.S were not justified in the use of the atomic bomb to force Japan’s surrender. First of all there were alternative options to resolve the war than resorting to drop a bomb. Instead of bombing Japan we could’ve cut a deal or create a treaty to end the war with little to no bloodshed or could’ve even waited for the Russians to attack to scare Japan into conditional surrender or at least less casualties if assisted by U.S army. Truman should have assessed…
- 615 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays