Preview

The Aquatic Ape Theory

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
319 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Aquatic Ape Theory
Rachel Harrison presents…
The Aquatic Ape Theory!

The aquatic ape theory is an alternative explanation of human evolution that suggests modern man spent some time adapting to a semi-aquatic environment before taking on its current form. This idea was first proposed in 1942, and its greatest proponent since that time has been Elaine Morgan. The aquatic ape theory, although compelling, has failed to become accepted within the scientific community. Max Westenhofer first published an account of the theory in 1942, but it was Alister Hardy who defined the idea more clearly in 1960: “My thesis is that a branch of this primitive ape-stock was forced by competition from life in the trees to feed on the sea-shores and to hunt for food, shell fish, sea-urchins etc., in the shallow waters off the coast. I suppose that they were forced into the water just as we have seen happen in so many other groups of terrestrial animals. I am imagining this happening in the warmer parts of the world, in the tropical seas where Man could stand being in the water for relatively long periods, that is, several hours at a stretch.” The first use of the term “aquatic ape” was by Desmond Morris in his book, The Naked Ape, in 1960; writer Elaine Morgan read of this and became the theory’s strongest promoter for the second half of the twentieth century. The theory is grounded in the idea that humans can be distinguished from their nearest evolutionary relatives by several semi-aquatic adaptations: a relatively hairless appearance in comparison to the great apes, a hooded nose and muscular nostril aperture control to prevent water from entering the lungs, extensive sebaceous glands, vestigial webbing between fingers, and the waxy coating found on newborns. The aquatic ape hypothesis has received little attention from mainstream paleoanthropologists as it lacks evidence from fossil records to support its

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Genius

    • 862 Words
    • 6 Pages

    1. Watch the episode of the TV show Nova titled, Ape Genius. (http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/beta/evolution/ape-genius.html click on Watch Ape Genius)…

    • 862 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Becoming Human

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Homosapiens are the most complex and adaptable animal on earth. How did we get this way? Our ancestry has evolved through millions of years. In Africa, a distinguishing occurrence, apes that stood on four legs started walking on two legs straight up. So now a fossil remain, a six million year old skull named Tumei could contain the secret of how human ancestry walked upright.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Bibliography: "Neanderthals (Homo Sapiens Neanderthalensis)." Ecotao Enterpises Aquaculture Consultancy with Manual Web and Printed Publishing. Ed. Laurence Evans. 17 Oct. 2009. Web. 9 Dec. 2010. .…

    • 3655 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Primate Tree Essay

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Based on the results of the BLAST for the first unknown species only the first hit Perodicticus potto located in the rain forests in Africa with a pairwise identity of 100% has a high enough percentage indicative of the same species. It is therefore likely that this species belongs to an already known species and is not a new founded one. For the second unknown species the results indicate that all of the results including the top hit Cercopithecus pogonias nigripe of Western Central Africa had pairwise percentages of around 92% indicating it likely a closely related species and not the same species. The third unknown species BLAST results indicated from the first hit Pan troglodytes troglodytes of Central Africa and all the subsequent results were 100-99.80% indicating a very high likelihood of them being the same species.…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The ancestors of the primates were mouse like mammals that were awake in the nights, lived in the trees and they eat insects. The first primates exist after the dinosaurs die. The first primates were the ones that had larger brains about 45 million years ago; these were similar to monkeys, apes and humans.…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Order Primate Analysis

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Many processes have taken place to shape humans from the Australopithecus Afarensis to the modern day human also known as the Homo Sapien. As a result, the two defining traits that occurred by taxonomy are the effects of brain size and bipedalism. Humans, like other primates are considered as Order Primates in the Hominidae family and therefore are a prime example of taxonomy when the two diverged into different species. During taxonomy when humans diverged from their ancestors 6 to 7 million years ago, the result is the differences such as walking upright, brain size and overall skeletal structure are prominent due to the divergence of humans and other primates. Although primates and humans both share many anatomical, behavioral and socialization traits the differences are drastic and are all a result of selective pressures.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bruce Bowers article, “Fossils hint at India’s crucial role in primate evolution” published in September of 2016, gives the theory of how certain bones excavated from a coal mine in India resemble the first primates from as early as 65 million years ago (). This article states how these bones approximately reveal how a common ancestor would look like and act. Researchers believe that since having the qualities of both superfamilies, Adapoidea and Omomyoidea they left behind a large quantity of different skeletal traits. With the idea that the evolution of primates and their relatives occurred on an isolated island of idea then spread, that gives them the time to evolve and have the specific bone structure and abilities that key them into being…

    • 222 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since humans and other primates share a variety of characteristics, other primates provide important observations about early humans. Homologies between hominids and other primates enhance to behavior because the physiological and cognitive formations that manage to control human demeanor are likely related to those of other primates than to members of other taxonomic groups. The reality of this broad collection of homologous traits, the commodity of the average evolutionary history of the primates, means that nonhuman primates give beneficial examples for understanding the evolutionary ancestry of hominid morphology and for resolving the basis of human nature.…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One of the biggest and most controversial question of the world is where and/or how did everything (animals, plants, and humans) come to existence. All regions around the world have their own theory as to where and how everything did come from. But which is correct? Some argue that the theory of evolution has all the answers we need to know about the world we live in. Yet others strongly oppose the theory of evolution and believe that the world and its inhabitants is the product of intelligent design by a creator. The theory of intelligent design does not necessarily have to tie in with religion, but in most cases it does. Evolution is a relatively new theory in comparison to how long the theory of intelligent design has been around. Charles Darwin is said to have ignited the debate we have to this day about creation through evolution. Darwin brings up many key terms that basically sums up his whole argument. They are natural selection and survival of the fittest—which basically states the most suitable creature will survive while the less suitable die off. But does this really prove that evolution is the correct theory to believe in? There is not enough evidence to prove that the evolution theory is correct. The theory that life is a product of intelligent design by a creator seems to be the most reasonable explanation for the world and all its inhabitants because of the complexity of all living things, the variety of creatures, and the lack of evidence and support that contributes to the theory of evolution.…

    • 2069 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Anthropoids ancestral to both Old World and New World monkeys appear in the fossil record in the Oligocene epoch around 35 million years ago.…

    • 86 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Savannah Hypothesis Essay

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The savannah hypothesis consists of how the apelike ancestors moved from the dark resourceful rainforests to grassy plains, where life was a little harder and had to find new ways to obtain nourishment. The need for males to stay away from predators and find food by hunting caused the “savanna hominid” to walk in a vertical position, using only 2 legs. Hunting and surviving in the new environment led the males to live longer and natural selection increased the size of the brain. On the other hand, the aquatic ape hypothesis takes a different approach. This hypothesis states that the ancestors spent time on land and in the water where they learned to catch their food and thrive. The capability to survive both on land and in the water gave the ancestors an advantage because they were able to escape from any predator that may have arose. The apes that had learned to survive in the water allowed them to stand upright on land due to how their bodies were positioned in the water. The aquatic ape hypothesis also explains how the fat is attached to the skin in humans because the fat helps them glide through the water a little easier and is dense, making people more floatable. Both hypotheses exhibit an explanation on how bipedalism and ancestors had evolved but both had different reasons on how they reached bipedalism. However, the savannah hypothesis focused more on the men, which questioned why it didn’t explain the role of women and children. The aquatic ape hypothesis…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Multi American Hypothesis

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There are several theories of the development of modern humans. The report discusses the most logical theories. In my view, the multi-region hypothesis is the most logical theory because it is better to prove facts of evolution.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Moreover, the material covered is highly specialized and may seem hard to follow for readers without a background in anthropology. There are several concepts, such as the idea of primate ancestry, that everyday people might not comprehend. This article might also receive resistance from those who do not agree with evolution, or even outright denial. I personally enjoy this article and the way the author presents the information. It is helpful for readers to have both sides of the argument, and Hoffman presents this skill when he includes the opposing views of other esteemed researchers. Not only does Hoffman present this information well, but also he ties the information with evidence from reliable sources, which boosts this article and keeps it entertaining. Hoffman is an excellent writer and does a good job stimulating his reader, assuming they have some background in anthropology or general…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When you were little you asked a lot of questions, right? But did you ever think that we actually descended from apes? Some parents will say that we came from God...but then you might wonder. Where did God come from? So did we really descend down from monkeys? Well let’s find out.…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Island Hoping

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This theory has been scrutinized by many scientist. There is no fossil evidence supporting this theory, and the lack of ability of monkeys to swim makes it very hard to believe. The island hopping theory is more of a “raffle” or “lottery”, the chances of such an event are one in a billion but given enough time and opportunities the chances begin to increase. However for enough of the same species of the same primate to travel the same way and come to the same place, enough to reproduce, not become lunch for new predators in an alien land, and to expand the species is highly unlikely. The first fossil records in the Americas date back to 25 million years ago and help give a better understanding of the origins of the New…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays