Preview

The Amritsar Massacre Committed by the British

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1857 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Amritsar Massacre Committed by the British
The Amritsar Massacre took place on April 13th 1919. It was committed by the British, who were colonized in India from the 1600’s to 1945. Before the Amritsar massacre, there was tension between Indian civilians and the British colonies for decades. This caused protests, mostly peaceful, throughout India. In March of 1919 the British passed the Rowlatt Act, invading the Indians privacy and decreasing their rights. On April 6th leaders of a peaceful protest against the Rowlatt Bill were arrested followed. This caused riots by the followers of the Indian protest leaders.The Massacre changed many Indians feeling toward the British Empire in India. The Indians were treated with little respect from the British, the Indians’ behavior by leading protests against British rule was taken too seriously by the British. The Indians’ actions and behaviors should not have resulted in the Amritsar Massacre. After the massacre, India thought that the British Rulers ruled with disrespect; therefore, India’s relationship with Great Britain was damaged. Over the years, tensions have risen between them. This was the last straw for Indians. Indians wanted an independent government. The Indian National Congress stepped in to gain independence and justice for India. It took several decades but after the intelligence and convincing of strong leaders, like Mohandas Gandhi and Chandra Bose, and civil disobedience, India finally gained independence in 1945.

During the British colonization in India it was known as British-India. Even though there was more Indians living to India than Europeans, the Europeans had more power and control than the Indians. Therefore they passed a bill called the Rowlatt Bill. This made the Indians very angry with The British Government. More and more Indians wanted independence from Great Britain. Many Indians had peaceful protest and took risks to get what they wanted. "The oppressive Rowlatt Act and Gandhi's protests against it propelled Gandhi from

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    To begin with, British imperialism helped to revise the legal system in India. Several things needed to be changed therefore many reforms began to occur. The legal system changed to promote justice towards all Indians no matter their classes. They worked to put an end to the caste system and slavery once and for all. Much of the population was Hindu and followed the Hindu customs and traditions even those that were hurtful or not beneficial to society or the country of India. For example one of the Hindu customs referred to as “Sati” is a belief that a widow must join her husband in death therefore she is required to throw herself unto his funeral…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imagine living in India when the British took full control, and then being forced to change your day to day life. The british had an economic interest in India which started during the 1600’s. During the Industrial Revolution, India was considered a prized possession by the British because they supplied raw materials to the factories for production. Eventually, the British took full control of India, and made some major changes that significantly impacted India. Although the British had a negative economic impact on India, they had a positive impact on both the political and social aspects of India. The British were able to set a foundation for India, and create a justice system while containing violence, even though they had to take away some Indian rights to do so.…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Once the British took over they paid them very poor and they had poor living conditions, compared to the British. The Indians were forced to be low ranked. As previously stated the Sepoys were forced to be gone overseas, which they really didn’t like. They forced the Hindus who were in a higher caste fight in remedial jobs and forced them to fight over seas , this really made them angry because in their religion it forced them to go down in the caste system. The British then did things that really offended the Muslim and Hindi people by using pig and cow fat for greasing the rifles. The Muslims and Hindu people thought of those things as sacred. Over all the British treated the Indians like…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Amritsar Massacre Dbq

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages

    On April 13, 1919, in Amritsar, India, a great tragedy occurred that day. The massacre that killed at least 379 people and the wounding of at least 1,200 others was committed by the British general Reginald Dyer (Cavendish). Many protests and riots preceded the massacre and resulting from them were the arrests of two leaders by the British ("Amritsar Massacre"). This caused many Indians to form mobs, which looted businesses and killed five British people (Cavendish). General Dyer was sent to Amritsar to restore order in there ("Amritsar Massacre"). What happened after he got there is why you, the Jury, are all in court today to decide General Dyer’s fate.…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On one hand the sources suggest the Amritsar Massacre did create hostility among Indians towards the British, with the British government being portrayed as repressive and irresponsible. However, the alternative view presented by the sources is that Indians were not hostile towards the British, but they were in fact appreciative of their help and did not feel that they were repressive.…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    British India Dbq

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages

    However, the British government intentionally created conflict between the two religious groups that made up India, causing Hindus and Muslims both to be concerned about their governmental role in the new India. In the Gandhi movie, we learn that from this tension, at least one million people died in conflict, including Gandhi himself. One million people dying in a fight that was caused by the British is anything but peaceful. Overall, these two political effects of British rule on India were negative, not positive. Indians were not represented in government, leading in civil rights oppressions (such as the right to free speech), and because the British were able to manipulate two large religions, they caused one million to die in the transition of…

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The events of the Indian mutiny; in particular the Enfield rifle cartridges, the murder of Christians, the shootings in Cawnpore and the massacre in Lucknow, vastly changed the presence of British in India. The British realised that they could not run a country through a company with no acknowledgement and respect for culture.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mohandas Gandhi launched a policy of nonviolent noncooperation against the British following the Massacre at Amritsar in 1919 (Boss, 2012). He used his moral outrage guided by reason to effect change in the cultural norms of India and ultimately helped India gain independence in 1947. Gandhi’s efforts have greatly impacted social and political reform, and have influenced later civil rights movements.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mahatma Gandhi, Indian nationalist, and the man credited with liberating India from British rule led a campaign of non-violent, civil disobedience that made the continued stay in the country by the British colonizers politically and morally untenable. Imprisoned by the British for fomenting unrest, Gandhi confronted the colonizers’ force of arms with the power of his ideas, and the rightness of his cause, and by his act of courageous disobedience prevailed gloriously over the British in the end. Today, India is a vibrant democracy of 1.2 billion people, free because of the disobedience of one frail, unprepossessing man, Mahatma Gandhi.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Not everybody was happy under British rule. The British limited Indian power and took away freedoms. Change was forced upon them. The British exploited Indian pluralism, resulting in religious conflict between Hindus and Muslims. Factories that posed a threat to British trade would be closed down to avoid competition. Local hand-made clothes were destroyed and finish goods using Indian raw material would be resold in India. The Indians could only trade with the British. When the Indians finally realized that the British would never see Indians as equals, no matter how Europeanized they became, they realized that they had to kick them out. However, try as they might, the British were simply too strong for a disconnected India. With ease, the British could take out ten times as many Indians in battle. Even after defeat, sepoys would suffer even more humiliation and abuse from the British. Indians felt a surge of nationalism. They resent their second-class status in their own countries, which leads us to today. Nationalist groups emerged. The Hindu Indian National Congress, which is later joined by the Muslim League encourage the Indians to take pride in their history and products. Millions of people are joining this movement and are fighting for…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Amritsar Massacre or “Jallianwala Bagh massacre’’, as it took place in on the 13th of April 1919 in Jallianwala Bagh garden in Amritsar, a city located in the north of India. General Reginald Edward Dyer had announced before 13 April that ‘’ any processions or gatherings of four men will be looked upon and treated as an unlawful assembly and dispersed by force of arms if necessary’’ (Cavendish, R., 2009). In the enclosed compound were about 5000 to 20 000 Indians according to different sources(Bose, P., & Lyons, L.,1999) They were in fact protesting peacefully against the “Rowlatt act” concerning the right of appeal for the people involved in seditious activities. Dyer placed the military vehicles in front of the only door of the garden and ordered the shooting of all the unarmed civilians. The shooting lasted until the British armed men ran out of ammunition. In fact, the military used approximately 1650 rounds of ammunition, killing 379 civilians and wounding 1136 others (Bose, P., & Lyons, L., 1999). The Amritsar Massacre is considered as a major turning point that led the British government to consider the possible independence of the Indian State as the massacre became source of controversies between the British officials and the Indian nationalists. All sources state clearly that the British government condemned the massacre and qualified it as ‘’unbritish’’. Churchill declared that the massacre was 'an extraordinary event, a monstrous event, an event which stands in singular and sinister isolation'. Dyer, standing before the commission charged of investigating the massacre, declared that he acted according to the rule of law, by engaging more precisely the ‘’minimum force’’ policy of public-order (Doyle, 2011). Subsequently, he also justified his action by the fact that the Indian nationals were defying the British authorities, and his action…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    British Imperialism

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Mohandas Gandhi was the leader of civil disobedience in India. Before the independence movement in India began, India was a British Colony since the 1760s. Prior to British imperialism and colonialism in India, many Indians hand craft their tools and clothes for survival. Since the British took over most of India due to the British’s commercial interests in the region of India. The British East India Company defeated the Newab of Bengal which…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thematic Essay

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Amristar Massacre occurred on April 3, 1919. The people of India wanted a greater self-rule and Britain promised them independence after World War II. When Britain broke their promise the people of India were infuriated. A large, passive crowd gathered in a northern Indian city called Amristar. A general who went by the name of General Dyer arrived with 50 soldiers. It was against the law in India for large groups of people to gather. Therefore, when they gathered in Amristar and the soldiers arrived General Dyer ordered them to open fire on all the men, women, and children present. Three hundred and seventy-nine people were killed while more than 1,100 were wounded. Dyer felt that this would produce a sufficient moral effect.…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    All Indian Muslim League

    • 1360 Words
    • 6 Pages

    All-Indian Muslim league By McGlockers Creation • Sir Syed Ahmad Kahn was the finder • Came from Muslims believing that Congress didn’t fully represent them but more towards the Hindu faith • Some of the beliefs was that the intellectual class wasn’t represented • Hindu’s were now treating Muslims with little respect and Congress sis nothing about it Simla delegation - 1906 • Following the creation of a Muslim-majority province the Hindu’s outrage had convinced Muslims that when a vote was going to be held they would be overwhelmed by the Hindu majority. • Lord Minto, the new viceroy, had indicated that reforms would be taken into consideration. After this announcement the majority of Muslims decided that they had to get their own representative group.…

    • 1360 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the First World War, the prices of various commodities rose, the conditions of the people worsened and the government extracted many dues from the people in the name of war efforts. This gave rise to resentment among the Indian people and there were several agitations against the government. To contain this, the government passed the Rowlatt Act in 1919 which authorized the government to arrest any person without warrant and to detain him/her without trial for two years.…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays