Preview

The American Drug War – a Conflict Theory Perspective

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2686 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The American Drug War – a Conflict Theory Perspective
In the mid to late 20th Century, the United States has experienced several states of Cultural Revolution. The Civil Rights Movement, the Women's Movement, the anti-War Movement during the Vietnam era, and the increasing presence of a widespread, politically active and highly vocalized youth counterculture led the United States government to feel that maybe, they were losing control of their population. The white, upper class men, who for centuries had dominated the political realm, began to feel their grip on power falter. By targeting drug use, the government would be free to "deal" with minorities especially African Americans, Hispanics, the free-love generation, and left-wing "radicals," all while claiming that they were protecting our country and our borders from the international drug trade, as well as ridding our streets of drugs and related violence. In addition, many government worried that if drug use became widespread, they would no longer be able to control a newer, "freer thinking" society. With the launch of the War on Drugs by President Richard M. Nixon in 1972, the United States government and unsuspecting citizens alike were embarking on a journey of discreet, institutionalized racial and class discrimination in order to ensure that the majority of governmental power stayed where it has since long before the adoption of capitalism: among the elite white males. Subsequent policy has included Reagan's militarization of the War on Drugs, the 1998 "Souder" Amendment to the Higher Education Act, and the prosecution the citizens of states such as California, where marijuana has been legalized, with federal crimes. These policies have had an increasingly negative effect on society, including overcrowding of jails and prisons, denial of federal higher education financial aid, life prison sentences for nonviolent repeat offenders, and other social atrocities. All the while, most law enforcement officials feel that they are "losing" the War on


Bibliography: Fellner, Jamie and Marc Mauer, "Losing the Vote: The Impact of Felony Disenfranchisement Laws in the United States" (Washington, DC: Human Rights Watch & The Sentencing Project, 1998), p. 8 Haney, Craig, Ph.D., and Philip Zimbardo, Ph.D., "The Past and Future of U.S. Prison Policy: Twenty-five Years After the Stanford Prison Experiment," American Psychologist, Vol. 53, No. 7 (July 1998), p. 718 Harrison, Paige M., & Jennifer Karberg, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Prison and Jail Inmates at Midyear 2002 (Washington, DC: US Dept. of Justice, April 2003), p. 11, Tables 13 & 14 Office of National Drug Control Policy, "National Drug Control Strategy: FY 2003 Budget Summary" (Washington, DC: Office of the President, February 2002), Table 2, p. 6 US Census Bureau, Department of Commerce, Census 2000 Redistricting Data (P.L. 94-171) Summary File for states, Population by Race and Hispanic or Latino Origin for the United States: 2000 (PHC-T-a) Table 1, from the web at http://www.census.gov/population/cen2000/phc-t1/tab01.txt

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    “Just say no.” (Reagan Declares War on Drugs, 1982). This was one of the many scare tactics used in America’s new war on drugs. The president needed to construct a plan to detract the public eye from drugs’ fame. Nancy Reagan was equally as adamant about keeping America safe and clean. She traveled to and spoke at many schools, enforcing the idea of simply refusing the temptation of drugs. Before the Reagan’s began their wartime, Richard Nixon introduced his own ‘war’ on drugs, stating, “America’s public enemy number one is drug abuse. In order to fight and defeat this enemy, it is necessary to wage a new, all-out offensive.” (Remarks About an Intensified Program for Drug Abuse Prevention, 1971). This mindset was yet another strategy used to make America energized and willing to fight this war. Nixon passed the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act in the 1970’s as a way to keep a constant eye on the drug industry. This act required the pharmaceutical industry to…

    • 1554 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Schaffer, C.A. (n.d.) Basic Facts About the War on Drugs. Retrieved on April 22, 2006 from:…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Melvyn B. Krauss, Edward P. Lazear. Searching for Alternatives:Drug-control Policy in the United States. Hoover Press, 1991.…

    • 1430 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    War on Drugs

    • 2405 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The policies that constitute “War on Drugs” are primarily based on racism due to biased policies, Jim Crow laws, and racial bias. Since America has been knowledgeable of the problems drugs bring upon the public the government has attempted to fight against drugs, however every fight is not fair. War is defined as a conflict carried on by force of arms, as between nations or between parties within a nation, however can war be based upon race? Or can war even exist if there is not a clear enemy. When you take the word war and glue it to the relations with drugs, racism becomes a factor. The so-called “war on drugs” is just a pretty way of saying war against the Africa Americans families. During the 1980s drugs infested the public and became a major issue. The public began to get concern with the consequences that began to increase higher than ever. The National Household Survey on Drug Abuse states that cocaine was mostly commonly used in 1985. It was clear that there had to be something done in order to reduce the consequences. That was when the so-called “War on Drugs” began, yet the war came with baggage. The war on drugs delivered the police system to be racially bias.…

    • 2405 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the prison system today, there has been an explosion of minorities being incarcerated for offenses that may not have gotten jail time if they had not been of a certain race. Although the overall numbers of incarcerations may have dropped just slightly for the first time in over 35 years, the amount of inmates remains to be a topic of concern. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, in 2003 almost 10.4 percent of black males who were between the ages of 25 to 29 were in prison compared to the rate of 2.4 percent for Hispanic males and a rate of 1.2 percent for white men. Why is there such a difference in these numbers? This paper will take a look at the growing trend. The last figures have shown that these figures have grown to 12 percent for black males, 3.7 percent for Hispanic males, and 1.6 percent for white males. This is a concern for the states that have prisons since the statistics show that by the end of 2002 most were operating at an average of 1 to 17 percent above their rated operating capacity. In 1990 the number of felony convictions in state courts was about 829,000. That number has grown to over 1,132,290 in 2006. The most current statistics (as of January 2010) have put the figure of people in state prison at about 1,404,053. Of all of the convictions that send a person to prison, the U.S. Bureau of Statistics has reported that about 69 percent of those have had prior convictions. That means that almost 20 percent of those in prison are repeat offenders. When studies were done asking the general public what reasons they…

    • 1748 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: Austin, J. & Irwin, J. (2001). It’s About Time: America’s Imprisonment Binge. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.…

    • 2326 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Criminal Sentencing

    • 3708 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1988). Report to the Nation on Crime and Justice, 2nd ed. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.…

    • 3708 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    ‘Stanford Prison Experiment Still Powerful After All These Years’. Stanford University News Service. August 1.1997. Stanford.California…

    • 2166 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Cost of Prison

    • 2464 Words
    • 10 Pages

    While most all citizens recognize the need to fund and support incarceration, few realize how tremendous the costs they face truly are. The US continues to incarcerate a higher percentage of its population than any other country in the world, with over 2.3 million people in prison or jail as of 2008 (John Schmitt, 2010). Last year, approximately 753 of every 100,000 people were locked up, up from just 220 in 1980 (Schmitt, 2010). This tremendous growth in imprisonment, mainly to working-aged men for violent crimes, has coincided with similarly remarkable increases in spending. From 1996 to 2001, the country witnessed “a $5½ billion increase [in spending] after adjusting for inflation”, and in the 15 year stretch between 1986 and 2001, “state correctional expenditures increased 145% in 2001 constant dollars” (James J. Stephan, 2001).…

    • 2464 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment had several important implications. One of which derives from average males that were so drastically affected under the burdens of being placed in a confinement setting. When these outcomes are correlated to the much more long- term and harshness of a real prison, you can only imagine the adverse effects on the real criminals serving jail…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the mid to late 20th Century, the United States experienced several states of Cultural Revolution. The Civil Rights Movement, the Women 's Movement, the anti-War Movement, and the increasing presence of a widespread, politically active and highly vocalized youth counterculture which led the United States government to feel that maybe they were losing control of their population. The white, upper class men, who for centuries had subjugated the political realm, began to feel their grip on power slipping. By targeting drug use, the government would be free to deal with minorities, especially African Americans, Hispanics, and left-wing radicals, all while claiming that they were defending our country and our borders from the international drug trade, as well as ridding our streets of drugs and drug-related violence. Many in governmental positions were nervous, assuming that if drug use became widespread they would no longer be able to control a newer, freer thinking society. With the launch of the War on Drugs by President Richard M. Nixon in 1972, the United States government and unwary citizens alike were embarking on a journey of clandestine, institutionalized race and class-based discrimination in order to ensure that the preponderance of governmental power would remain where it had securely been held long before the adoption of capitalism; with elite white males (Dalton, Elias, & Wandersman, 2007; Macionis, 2009).…

    • 2057 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even though the Stanford Prison Experiment has caused high controversy within the psychology field, it still shows how certain situations can affect one’s behavior.…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Racial Discrimination

    • 2828 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Cole, D (2001). No Equal Justice: Race and Class in the American Criminal Justice System. Washington D.C, The New Press…

    • 2828 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    American Drug Policy

    • 2231 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The intended outcome of the Americas Drug Policy was to eradicate the supply and use of illegal drugs. When Nixon initiated the policies that are in place today he had high hopes and goals about eliminating the importing and sales of illegal drugs that were causing what he called our nation’s number one public enemy in 1971, drug abuse...Initially he spoke of treatment and education for drug addicts and sticker laws for deterring the suppliers. He knew the monastery costs of fighting this war could be high saying “ If we are going to have a successful offensive, we need more money. Consequently, I am asking the Congress for $155 million in new funds, which will bring the total amount this year in the budget for drug abuse, both in enforcement and treatment, to over $350 million.” (Nixon,1971). His plan involved the consolidation of nine federal organizations that at the…

    • 2231 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    There is a large majority of people arguing good points on either side of this drug war, in which they are opposed with one another, in which one side says, “Drug enforcement is engaged in controlling the spread and remedying the effects of drug abuse.” There are also those that state that these laws and programs are designed to help decrease America’s dependence on illicit substances. The people from the another side of this argument begs to differ, as they claim that the drug war is an utter failure, ex-presidential candidate Ron Paul explains, “This war on drugs has been a detriment to personal liberty and it 's been a real abuse of liberty." In another section Ron mentions that, “Our prisons are full with people who have used drugs who should be treated as patients -- and they 're non-violent. Someday we 're going to awaken and find out that the prohibition we are following right now with drugs is no more successful, maybe a lot less successful, than…

    • 1927 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays