The affects of organisational culture on its performance
The affects of organizational culture are very much apparent on an organizations progress. This fact can be understood as of the advancement in the field of HRM too where two major types of HRM that are Hard and Soft HRM practices mainly takes place in organization. The Hard version normally is concern with the company’s objects while the soft version focuses further on employee’s concerns and their needs. This clearly tells us that organizations are sensing and observing the roles of culture in their success therefore significant attention is given towards an organization’s culture by it top management. One can define organizational culture as shared values that inform organizational members regarding how to behave appropriately (e.g., O’Reilly & Chatman, 1996). Organizations by means of a strong culture create clear and coherent values (Chatman & Cha, 2002; Saffold, 1988) and expect that members agree by means of and care intensely regarding those values (Jackson, 1966; O’Reilly, 1989), even if core values emphasize dissent and creativity (e.g., Flynn & Chatman, 2001; Sutton & Hargadon, 1996). Agreement refers to the level of consensus (or crystallization, cohesion, consistency, or dispersion) among members regarding organizational values and associated behavioural norms, while intensity refers to members' demonstrated commitment to those values. Academics and practitioners have touted the virtues of strong organizational cultures that emphasize strategically relevant values. By augmenting members’ understanding of organizational objectives, ties to one another, and commitment, organizations by means of strong cultures augment the chances that members can execute those objectives and, as a collective, augment organizational performance (Deal & Kennedy, 1982; Pottruck & Pearce, 2001; Tushman & O’Reilly, 1997). Though some researchers have questioned how well strong cultures improve bottom-line performance...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document