Preview

Texas V. Johnson Case Brief

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
509 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Texas V. Johnson Case Brief
U.S. Supreme Court
TEXAS v. JOHNSON, 491 U.S. 397 (1989)
491 U.S. 397

Citation: Johnson was convicted of desecration of a venerated object in violation of a Texas statute.

Date Decided: June 21, 1989

Facts of case: At the 1984 Republican National Convention in Dallas, Texas, Johnson decided to burn an American flag in protest of some policies made by the Reagan administration and some Dallas corporations that he did not agree with. Noone sustained physical injury or was even threatened with physical injury, but many were offended by the jesture made by Johnson. The Texas penal code forbids the desecration of a venerated object.

Issues: Does the first amendment overrule the Texas law that forbids the desecration of a venerated object under these circumstances?

Decision of the court: The State court of Appeals affirmed that Johnson was in the wrong, however, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals reversed.

Opinion or reasons for the decision: The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals pointed out that the state, under the first amendment, could not punish Johnson for burning the flag due to the current circumstances. The court found that Johnson's burning of the flag was expressive conduct protected by the First Amendment. They concluded that the State could not criminally sanction flag desecration in order to preserve the flag as a symbol of national unity.

Dessenting opinion: Justice Stevens stated, "As the Court analyzes this case, it presents the question whether the State of Texas, or indeed the Federal Government, has the power to prohibit the public desecration of the American flag. The question is unique. In my judgment rules that apply to a host of other symbols, such as state flags, armbands, or various privately promoted emblems of political or commercial identity, are not necessarily controlling. Even if flag burning could be considered just another species of symbolic speech under the logical application of the rules

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Fifty one white stars, thirteen red and white stripes should not be near the line of fire. Since the 1960’s, burning the flag has been protected under the First Amendment. Many attempts throughout the years have been made to overrule that decision.(Garbus Martin) In 1968, the Federal Flag Desecration Law was enacted. It prohibited any action of “contempt” against the flag. (Flag Burning and Desecration) Many Americans sacrifice their lives to keep our American Flag flying. Although many believe burning the American Flag is okay, it should be illegal.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Abel Fields’s was found guilty in his first trial and he appealed his sentence. The court of appeals overturned his conviction, but then the government…

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Judgment reversed, on the law and the facts as a matter of discretion in the interests of justice, and indictment dismissed.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    VDread Scott artwork “what is the proper way to display the US flag?” In the exhibit, they place the flag the United States flag on the floor and they have a book to so people can write their opinion. Above the book, there is a picture of South Korea students burning the flag. “President Bush Sr. declared What is the Proper Way… “disgraceful” and the entire US Congress denounced this work as they passed legislation to “protect the flag.”(Dread Scott.net) Dread Scott had the courage to display his artwork the way he did. I think it was brave of him to display it in the form he did. His artwork is controversial because in order for people to write there thought they have to be willing to step on the flag.…

    • 218 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Business Law Ch 5 Hw

    • 1781 Words
    • 8 Pages

    4. According to Texas v. Johnson, flag burning is an example of _________, protected by the ____________.…

    • 1781 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    It merely creates a new power subject to the previously existing limits. However, this just-an-affirmative-grant theory is problematic in that the 28th Am purports to confer an affirmative power on the states; yet the states do not derive their affirmative powers from the federal Constitution; thus, as to the states, the point of the Amendment is to lift the 1st Am's bar to flag-desecration prosecutions, and it is logical to assume that this is the point with respect to the federal government as well. Moreover, the obvious purpose of the 28th Am is, at a minimum, to overrule Texas v Johnson and United States v. Eichman. To hold otherwise would be to deny the People's ability to amend the Constitution. In a prosecution against White, White could object that he did not violate the Act because the homemade 49-star flag was not "the flag of the United States." To the extent that the Act covers imperfect flag replicas, White could argue, it exceeds the government's power under the 28th Amendment. These are close questions; however, the difficulty of determining what exactly counts as a U.S. flag is ordinarily invoked as an argument against a flag-desecration amendment, and by passing the amendment, Congress and the states rejected this argument. Presumably, the 28thAmendment gives Congress some leeway to define a U.S. flag broadly. Whether it did so in the Act is largely a question of statutory construction, while the assignment asks for constitutional arguments. {Comment: Perhaps the statute fails to give proper notice, a due process issue that some answers raised.} Finally, Vermont probably has third-party standing to raise the 1st Am objection on the ground that overly broad laws chill free speech, and should be amenable to challenge by any party with Article III…

    • 1981 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Some citizens write stern letters to their congressmen, some post signs in their front yard, others gather signatures on a petition to voice their opinions. However, Gregory Lee Johnson decided to set the American flag ablaze to allow his opinion to be heard. In 1984, a political protest march was occurring through the streets of Dallas, Texas consisting of a diverse group of civilians who were against the policies of the current Reagan Administration. Johnson, in the middle of the crowd, was handed an American Flag and some kerosene by an unknown protestor outside the Dallas City Hall; Johnson decided to throw the American flag onto the ground, pour the kerosene on it and set it on fire. Many protesters around Johnson began to chant, “America,…

    • 1691 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The battle in the courts of people desecrating the American flag, goes back to 1907. Showing disrespect toward our Nation's flag is intolerable. People have freedom of speech, but do not need to show their opinion through burning the American flag. Burning the flag is offensive to many U.S citizens and is disrespectful to our nation because the American flag is a symbol of freedom.…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    GOVERNEMNT

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages

    It is important that a state does not violate a citizen’s rights to expression and speech. The first amendment protects those rights. This decision will influence future laws by encouraging the states to avoid making laws that are unconstitutional.…

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why do people burn the flag? The issue of freedom of speech is people are abusing the freedom of speech. This issue is important because some people are burning the american flag. Also after school officials banned civil rights groups from recruiting on campus. Students at the University of California organized sit ins, rallies, and strikes. People who were involved were students from Berkeley named, Mario Savio, and Bettina Apthecker. The common good of people should respect it because they US gave us that privilege of speech. We owe our government the respect because they are the ones who gave us the right.…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Us humans should accept Johnson in “ Texas v Johnson” even though his expressions differ from one another. On pages 1 and 2 of page 1, stated “ We decline therefore, to create for the flag an exception to the joust of principles protected by the 1st amendment.” On the next page, line 39 stated, “ The way to preserve the flags special role is not to punish those who feel differently about these matters.” This evidence helped decide the rational decision to not punish Johnson. It relates to the quote because it’s saying he has a right in the 1st amendment to express by burning the flag. Also we should punish those who have different opinions and views than ourselves.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One example is Walker v. Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans. The Supreme Court ruled that Texas did not violate the First Amendment when it prohibited specialty license plates bearing the Confederate battle flag (Liptak par. 1). As a result of this ruling, freedom of expression became limited. Another case that demonstrates the amount of rights provided in the First Amendment is Elonis v. United States. In this case, the Supreme Court ruled that people should not be prosecuted for threats made on Facebook and other social media platforms, reversing the conviction of a Pennsylvania man who wrote violent messages against his separated wife (Liptak par. 1). According to this ruling, anything written in social media websites is protected by the First Amendment.…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Supreme Court views the issue of flag burning as a right given to Americans under the First Amendment. A bill was proposed to the legislature and while it made it through Congress, it did not pass with the required 2/3 vote in the Senate. However, many Americans believe that the flag does not just symbolize the government, but the nation as a whole. Amendments to ban flag burning would in fact give people the freedom to protect the flag and its meaning but would be invasive to our first amendment right. Hence, taking away the actual meaning of the flag as a symbol of freedom.…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I understand that the American flag is symbolic, but if someone were to burn it, it can always be replaced with a new one. Why value the United States, everything that happened, all the wars fought and people who died for their country, through a flag, when you can value it in your hearts? I’m not saying that individuals should get rid of the flag. I’m just saying that if someone goes and burns an American flag, not to take it so personally. Take a monument, for example.…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    freedom of religion

    • 3941 Words
    • 16 Pages

    The respondents relied on the precedence of Gerona et al v. Secretary of Education. Gerona doctrine provides that we are a system of separation of thechurch and state and the flag is devoid of religious significance and it doesn’t involve any religious ceremony.…

    • 3941 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Good Essays