Preview

Test 1 Question Bank

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
8500 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Test 1 Question Bank
Business Law 265
Spring 2008
Exam #1, February 26, 2008

1. Jerry sent a letter containing an offer to sell his mountain bike to Bill for $300. This letter was sent on Oct. 1 and it was received on Oct. 4. On Oct. 5 Bill sent a letter to Jerry accepting the offer. But then Bill changed his mind; on Oct 6 Bill sent a message by personal messenger to Jerry, rejecting Jerry’s offer. The messenger delivered the rejection and it was received by Jerry on Oct. 7. The letter containing Bill’s acceptance was received on Oct. 8. Based on the above, has a contract been formed for the sale of the mountain bike?
No, because the rejection was received before the acceptance was received

2. Under the “golden rule” regarding assignments, which party must not be harmed (made worse off) by the assignment? non assigning party

3. Gary mails an offer to Brian on June 15. Brian receives the offer on June 16. Gary mails a revocation of the offer on June 17. Brian mails a letter of acceptance on June 18. Brian receives the revocation on June 19. Was a contract formed? | Yes, on June 18. | 4. Jana and Annie enter into a written agreement whereby Jana promises to sell and Annie promises to buy a certain parcel of land for $5,000. There is adequate consideration, the contract is legal and both parties have contractual capacity. The contract is fully performed by both parties on January 1. Which of the following best describes this contract as of January 12? Bilateral, express, executed, valid 5. The rejection of an offer:
Is effective when received by the offeror, and prevents the offeree from later accepting that original offer.
6. Kristin offers to sell land to Ian for $5,000. Ian says that he will not pay$5,000 but he will pay $4,000. Kristin says no. Two days later, Ian changes his mind and delivers an acceptance to Kristin’s original offer. Which of the following best describes this situation? Ian made a counteroffer, which

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    law421 week 3

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Just three days before the expiration of the 90-day period, the parties reached an oral distribution agreement at a meeting. Chou offered to draft the contract that would memorialize their agreement. Before Chou drafted the agreement, a BTT manager sent Chou an e-mail with the subject line “Strat Deal” that repeated the key terms of the distribution agreement including price, time frames, and obligations of both parties. Although the e-mail never used the word contract, it stated that all of the terms had been agreed upon.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Week 12 Tute Questions

    • 647 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Question 3: Nicole recently entered into a contract to sell her house in Canberra to Lakeview Developments Pty Ltd for $750,000. She was told by the receptionist in Lakeview's office that Lakeview Developments is a development company which plans to demolish the house and build some apartments. The contract was signed by Nicole and was also signed 'for and on behalf of Lakeview Developments Pty Ltd' by Anthony Blunt, who showed her his business card describing him as the 'Developments Manager' of Lakeview Developments.…

    • 647 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ls311 Unit 4

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In this case study, we are looking into what constitutes a contract and when a person is obligated to honor a contract. In this scenario Carrie offered to sell a set of legal encyclopedias to Antonio for $300.00. Antonio said that he would think about her offer and let her know his decision the next day. Norvel, who had overheard the conversation between Carrie and Antonio, said to Carrie, "I accept your offer," and Carrie gave Norvel the books. The next day, Antonio, who had no idea that Carrie had already sold the books to Norvel, told Carrie that he accepted her offer. We need to determine whether or not Carrie is obligated to sell her encyclopedias to Norvel and whether or not she is breaching a contract with Antonio.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Issue: The issue is whether the objective circumstances indicate that the parties intended to form a contract…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    PRETEST 2

    • 702 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In the absence of a contact complete with offer, acceptance, and consideration, a court may enforce a promise under the principle of promissory estoppel where…

    • 702 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On September 1, Jennings, a used-car dealer, wrote a letter to Wheeler in which he stated, “I have a 1955 Thunderbird convertible in mint condition that I will sell you for $13,500 at any time before October 9. [Signed] Peter Jennings.” By September 15, having heard nothing from Wheeler, Jennings sold the Thunderbird to another party. On September 29, Wheeler accepted Jennings’s offer and tendered $13,500. When Jennings told Wheeler he had sold the car to another party, Wheeler claimed Jennings had breached their contract. Is Jennings in breach? Explain.…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay #2

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Cleavers receive the Nelsons’ proposal from October 5th and respond via email asking a question regarding the offer for $525,000 with a 15% down payment ($78,500) due upon acceptance of the Nelsons’ proposal. The Cleavers ask the Nelsons how firm they are on the 15% ($78,500) down payment and ask the Nelsons if they would be willing to lower it down to 10% ($52,500). What the Cleavers’ email legally does is put two offers between the parties. An inquiry and alternate offer does not get rid of the original offer, but places an alternate offer alongside of the original one. In other words, the Cleavers are not rejecting the Nelsons’ offer but are rather proposing a new offer without rejecting the last one. This effectively puts two offers between the Nelsons and the Cleavers. Now the Nelsons can choose to accept either one of these offers which would clearly make the remaining offer void. The Nelsons receive the email the same day it was sent and respond by mailing a letter to the Cleavers revoking the offer they made in the October 5th letter for $525,000 with a 15% down payment ($78,500) due upon acceptance…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cost Accounting

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. Dickison orders one thousand widgets at $5 per widget from International Widget to be delivered within sixty days. After the contract is consummated and signed, Dickison orally requests that International deliver the widgets within thirty days rather than sixty days. International agrees. Is the contractual modification binding?…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    blaw 2

    • 4792 Words
    • 14 Pages

    1.Adams orders one thousand widgets at $5 per widget from International Widget to be delivered within sixty days. After the contract is consummated and signed, Adams requests that International deliver the widgets within thirty days rather than sixty days. International agrees. Is the contractual modification binding?…

    • 4792 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    A contract is a promise that can be enforced by law. In order for a contract to be enforceable it must have the necessary elements to form a contract. The elements of a contract are an offer and acceptance, consideration, capacity, and legality. Three days before the 90-day expiration period was up, BTT and Chou reached an oral agreement. Immediately after the oral agreement, the BTT manager sent Chou and e-mail with the subject line “Strat Deal” in which he repeated the terms of the distribution agreement. The e-mail included price, time frames, and the obligations of both parties. Even though Chou made an agreement with BTT under the exclusive negotiation agreement in which it stated there would be no distribution contract unless it was in writing, the e-mail is considered “in writing” under the mailbox rule. All the elements of a contract were met in the e-mail, offer, acceptance, consideration, capacity, and legality. Even though Chou failed to follow up with a distribution contract in writing for both parties to sign, he did receive the terms in writing from the BTT manager. This validates that there was an actual contract between both…

    • 1717 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Theory to practice

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Big Time Toymaker (BTT) develops, manufactures and distributes toys and board games. An inventor named Chou created a board game called Strat. Chous invention caught the attention of BTT and they sought out to negotiate with Chou. During the time of communication between both Chou and BTT an agreement was made. Both parties agreed to BTT having exclusive negotiating wrights for a 90-day period in exchange for $25,000.00. The agreement stated that no contract exist unless in writing. After a meeting when an oral agreement was made Chou was emailed a document subject Strat deal by a manager of BTT. This email can be considered the contract in writing and Chou assumed so, later to find that BTT was now run by new management who claimed they were uninterested in his invention.…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Notes for Final Paper

    • 2734 Words
    • 10 Pages

    C. Yes, because a promise is a promise and consideration has nothing to do with this agreement.…

    • 2734 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    chapter 11 hw - law

    • 765 Words
    • 3 Pages

    b- This is not enforceable. This is an example of past consideration, which is not consideration. P had already rendered the service at the time the company’s promise was made. In other words, the service was not induced by or given in exchange of the promise. If the promise were in writing and acknowledged the past consideration, however, this contract would be enforceable.…

    • 765 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since the letter had never arrived, there would be no revocation of offer. Amanda would have the right choose whether to accept Tracy’s offer. If Amanda wanted to accept, then she had to perform the way of acceptance stated which was to transfer money to the bank account. Then, a legally-biding contract would be concluded. Parties violated the contract could be sued by the other parties. If Amanda did not perform the way of acceptance stated, there would be no contract concluded.…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    BTT and Chou must exhibit mutual assent to determine when a contract was reached. The contract is determined to be valid if shown that an offer was made (by BTT), and there was acceptance by Chou. Initially, BTT and Chou entered a 90-day agreement for exclusive negotiation rights to Strat in exchange for $25,000. Once payment is accepted, Chou’s right to solicit distribution from an outside party is restricted. This shows mutual assent as the promisee, Chou, gave up a legal right and the promisor, BTT, made its promised based on a mutual exchange.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics