Preview

Terrorism a Curse or Blessing to International Humanitarian Law

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2229 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Terrorism a Curse or Blessing to International Humanitarian Law
TERRORISM A CURSE OR BLESSING TO INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW

Executive summary

This paper looks into terrorism and the effect it has had on international humanitarian law. Whether it has had a negative impact on the already existing laws that deal with conflict situations or whether it has had a positive impact. It also looks into the situations terrorism has led to and the various ways the fight against terrorism has been used to undermine human rights and given states a leeway to commit crimes and walk away without facing the consequences. It also looks into how prisoners or detainees who have been arrested because they have been linked to terrorism have a disadvantage if compared to prisoners or detainees of war who are protected under international humanitarian law. It also gives various solutions to the problem the world is currently facing of dealing with terrorism without undermining the current laws in place. The paper also provides for solutions that include using existing laws that complement each other to find a lasting resolution to terrorism.

Introduction

Terrorism is a relatively new phenomenon in the world. It became a great issue when the most powerful nation, United States of America, became a victim of this new phenomenon. Before the attacks on the United States of America, there were several attacks such as the bomb attacks in Kenya and Uganda. However after the attacks on the United States was when terrorism was taken as a serious issue and debates begun all over the world on how to solve the problem and eventually the term war on terror or fight against terror was born. This war on terror also led to a situation where existing laws were questioned on whether they can deal with terrorism efficiently.

Terrorism and International Humanitarian Law

The fight against international terrorism has also led to states ignoring and threatening human rights of their citizens and other people such as refugees and immigrants. States have


Bibliography: http://www.icrc.org/eng/resources/documents/faq/terrorism-faq-050504.htm. International Humanitarian Law and Terrorism, Questions and Answers (2004). Retrieved 23/10/2010. http://www.icrc.org/eng/resources/documents/misc/66ema9.htm. The relevance of international humanitarian law in contemporary armed conflicts (2004). Committee of legal advisers on public international law (CADHI), 28th meeting Lausanne, September 2004 - Intervention by Dr. Jakob Kellenberger, President of the ICRC. Retrieved 1/11/2010. http://www.icrc.org/eng/resources/documents/statement/ihl-statement-080508.htm. International humanitarian law: its relevance in contemporary conflict (2008). Annual lecture, SOAS, University of London, address by Angelo Gnaedinger, director-general of the International Committee of the Red Cross. Retrieved 1/11/2010. Alison Parker and Jamie Fellner, Above the Law: Executive Power after September 11 in the United States (2004), World Report, Human Rights Watch. Report 2004, War on Global values (May 26, 2004), Amnesty International. International Convention for the Supression of the Financing of Terrorism, United Nations General Assembly, Resolution 54/109, December 9, 1999. Four Geneva Conventions of 1949 and their two Additional Protocols of 1977.
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    2.08 Works Cited Questions Worksheet English 2
    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages

    2.08 Works Cited Questions Worksheet English 2

    "A Brief Look at Pertinent Articles of the Geneva Conventions on the Laws of Warfare." (2006): n.Web. 10 Aug. 2014.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    War on Terroism paperfinal 2 1

    • 1679 Words
    • 5 Pages

    War on Terroism paperfinal 2 1

    When analyzing the world's current situation concerning terrorism, it is difficult to say whether the global war on terrorism has been a successful one. Since the September 11, 2001 attack on the World Trade Centers in New York City, George Bush, former president of the United States, vowed to defeat terrorism. Moreover, to entirely grasp the subject, one must be familiar with the definition of terrorism and it can be defined as an act of violence or threatened violence intended to spread panic in a society, and to bring about political change. Terrorists do not necessarily live in their native states, majority migrate to neighboring countries, and countries and often go undetected. The logistics and man power it takes to combat terrorism is immense, and it seems more evident that the global war on terrorism is not succeeding due to essentially three factors. First, that The United States has created a terrorist haven in the Middle East. Second, international support for the global war on terrorism is decreasing. Third, terrorism has been on the constant increase since 911. Sept 11, 2001 changed the world forever because the attack on the two most powerful economic symbols which was the Twin Towers World Trade Center and the Pentagon.…

    • 1679 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Andrew Hurrell's Article Analysis
    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Andrew Hurrell's Article Analysis

    Andrew Hurrell’s article analysed how the order of international relations has changed following the September 11 terrorist attacks. Hurrell (2002), examined how legal, moral norms and rules pressured the US to engage with international law following 9/11. He argued that international law aims to restrain self-interest. However, it cannot control what states decide to do, it can only serve as a set of guidelines.…

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    9/11 Terrorism Impact
    • 2354 Words
    • 10 Pages

    9/11 Terrorism Impact

    Terrorism can be described as any act of violence intended to cause death or serious bodily harm in order to intimidate the population or to compel a government and international agencies from doing something. To the United States, the most horrific terrorist attack to happen occurred on September 11th 2001 when terrorists hijacked four planes and crashed them into the twin towers and the pentagon. It not only resulted in the deaths of thousands of innocent civilians, but it would change American policy for decades to come. In the aftermath of 9/11, the United States started a policy of a global war on terror(GWOT) which would end up costing an unimaginable amount of money and hundreds of thousands of deaths. In this paper, I will review four…

    • 2354 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    Justifiable Terrorism in Total Wars
    • 1726 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Justifiable Terrorism in Total Wars

    The word ‘terrorism’ instantly makes people shudder; the negative connotations and controversies surrounding terrorism in modern society are enough to spark a discussion of whether it is justifiable or not. In order to determine whether or not terrorism can be justified, a clear definition must be decided upon. Decades before the attacks on the World Trade Center in New York City on September 11, 2001, the definition of the word terrorism was hard to define. Political figures around the globe argued and disagreed on what they thought should have determined the act of terrorism.1 Now, there are multiple different definitions originating from distinct cultures and societies, suggesting that terrorism is in the eye of the victim. One definition of terrorism is “any violent or criminal act planned for a political or ideological purpose2”; while another claims that terrorism is understood to be a direct attack on innocents3. Since both of these definitions have important components to them, it can be assumed that both traits are essential to defining terrorism. For the purpose of this paper, the definition of terrorism will be understood as ‘a violent attack on innocents for the purpose of political change’. It can be hard for most people to understand the act of injuring and/or killing hundreds, or maybe even tens of thousands of people, as justifiable. However, if the innocents are seen as legitimate targets, the violent acts of terrorism can be carried out without justification. In order for innocent people to be perceived as legitimate targets or combatants, there must be a defined situation of total war. Total war is a type of warfare where a state or a nation battling and fighting with another, mobilizing all accessible resources and population to aid in the battles and the overall victory. For example, during World War II, all countries involved were deploying their civilian…

    • 1726 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Child Soldiers Research Paper
    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Child Soldiers Research Paper

    International responses include the Geneva conventions, ‘laws of war’. Which is a series of 4 treaties adopted between 1864 and 1949 to regulate the conduct of armed conflict and attempt to limit its affects. these 4 treaties include; the first Geneva convention (1864) which protects wounded and sick soldiers on land during war, the second Geneva convention (1906) which protects wounded, sick and ship wrecked military personnel at sea during war, the third Geneva convention (1929) which…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Sociological Perspectives on War
    • 2935 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Sociological Perspectives on War

    Mednicoff, David M. “Humane wars? International Law, Just War Theory and Contemporary Armed Humanitarian Intervention.” Law, Culture and the Humanities Vol. 2 (2006): 373-398…

    • 2935 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    United States Intervention In Darfur
    • 242 Words
    • 1 Page

    United States Intervention In Darfur

    Unfortunately, when states engage in intervention, it is rarely for humanitarian purposes. In many cases, national interest transcends international law in order to pursue economic profit from land or natural resources, oil in South Sudan’s case. R2P’s moral goals to bring peace, justice, democracy combined with weak institutional frameworks resulted in the United State’s and Britain’s’ justification of the invasion of Iraq. There are no authoritative bodies, but many unclear procedures and instructions, especially when determining what are atrocities and which constitute international intervention. The reluctance and indecision of states to interfere in Darfur in 2004 encompass the lack of autonomy of the doctrine. Despite saving lives, even…

    • 242 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Hoffman And Terrorism
    • 1913 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Hoffman And Terrorism

    The subject of terrorism is both complicated and emotive. It is complex because it combines so many varied aspects of human experience, including arenas such as politics, social discourse, psychology, philosophy, military strategy, and history, to name a few. Terrorism is also emotive both because experiences of terrorist acts arouse tremendous feelings, and because those who see terrorists as justified often have strong feelings concerning the morality of the use of violence. Without a doubt, terrorism evokes strong feelings whenever it is discussed. Terrorism is a global phenomenon that is easily recognised yet difficult to define. Academics across the world describe it according to their political and socio-economic conditions; therefore…

    • 1913 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Final Ref
    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Final Ref

    The Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 52, No. 2, International Organizations Count (Apr., 2008), pp. 269-294…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Humanitarian Intervention
    • 2522 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Humanitarian Intervention

    CONTRADICTION OF TWO NORMS The critical issue in any debate on humanitarian intervention is the need to harmonize intervention with the principle of sovereignty, which in essence requires that a sovereign state be treated as an independent political unit, its territorial integrity be respected, and it be allowed to pursue its domestic affairs without external interference. These stipulations are essentially those regulating inter-state relations that have evolved since the Treaty of Westphalia and have been codified as core principles of international law. In terms of intra-state affairs, however, sovereignty represents the result of a social contract between the government and the governed/citizens to ensure good governance. Some of the intra-state components of sovereignty already have been embedded in humanitarian norms—such as in the case of the United Nations’ 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the Genocide Convention of 1948, and the four Geneva Conventions signed in 1949—but it is only in the post–cold war world that democracy, human rights, and the rule of law have been recognized by the…

    • 2522 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Examples Of Humanitarian Intervention
    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Examples Of Humanitarian Intervention

    Humanitarian Intervention has gained much attention in International relations, in protecting civilians from the atrocities committed by governments of states has resulted in further problems. Humanitarian intervention has seen the worlds most powerful intervene and engage in military action in conflicts, which states justify and legitimize as a humanitarian cause. One of the main reoccurring problems of Humanitarian intervention is the question of what motivates states to go to war, is to act as neutral component in ending conflict or to take action in fulfilling their own self interests. (SOURCE) In response to the underlying issues of humanitarian intervention, the principle of “responsibility to protect”, was introduced to protect population from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity.…

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Effects of War and Peace on Foreign Aid
    • 1470 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Effects of War and Peace on Foreign Aid

    References: Perrin, P. (1998). The impact of humanitarian aid on conflict development. International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). Retrieved from http://www.icrc.org…

    • 1470 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Terrorism Ethics
    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Terrorism Ethics

    Crime control measures of the conventional kind such as increased penalties for offenses are integrated into the criminal justice system. In the War on Terrorism however, the criminal justice system has been judged inadequate or inappropriate. Thus, while the U.S. considers itself “at war,” it does not regard many of those taken prisoners in threat war as prisoners of war who are to be treated in accordance with the rules laid down in the Geneva Conventions, especially treatment of combats captured during an interactional armed conflict and with civilians who are involved in the armed…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Importance Of Australian Government's Response To Terrorism
    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Importance Of Australian Government's Response To Terrorism

    Additional the United Nations had already put into place a response to terrorism which was the 14 accession/ratifications and 119 signatures on the ‘International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism’. This is an important response to realize the integrated nature of crime financing…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics