States was severely affected with the attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941.
That day, more than 2,800 people were killed, leaving Hawaii in ruins. Another historical event that took place was 9/11. On September 11, 2001 3,000 people were killed, 400 of which were Police or Firefighters. With those two dates in mind, people begin to ask themselves, am I safe? When and where will the next attack take place? All of those questions are valid and important questions, yet people miss out on the big question of
What can be done to reduce the spread of Terrorism in the United States? The answer is simple, Find a way to tighten security, while still maintaining an individual's civil liberties. One of the biggest controversial topics today is the argument of whether airport personnel should be able to search through a person's belongings without probable cause. Many airports around the United States have implemented the new law since the
9/11 attacks. But is what the government doing wrong? The 4th Amendment grants a citizen the right to be free from searches without probable cause. On the other hand,
The Patriot Act circumvents traditional warrant requirements and gives officials and easier way of obtaining a FISA warrant. A FISA warrant grants authorities the right to rummage through belongings as long as they were able to say Foreign Intel could be obtained. With the Patriot Act in effect, many people have become frustrated because they believe that their privacy is being revoked with this law. On the contrary, with these new “Privacy Revoking” laws, over 80,000 illegal immigrants have been arrested and over 75 of them were found guilty being involved in some way with terrorism plans against the United States. So the numbers really do show, The Patriot Act may sound like a bad plan, however in the end, the country is safer than it would be without the
Patriot Act.
Before 9/11 occurred, Terrorism was an all time low in the United States. In fact, the only major Terrorist event that occurred in the span from 2001 to 2011 was 9/11.
Shortly after 9/11, a poll was taken that showed that there were 982 terrorists attacks in
2002 with a death toll of 3,823. Another poll was taken in 2011 that showed there were
4,564 attacks with 7,743 deaths. Although 2011 seemed like a very “active” year for terrorist attacks in the United States, these numbers show a 25% drop in attacks and deaths from 2007. Showing that the actions the United States Government are taking to step up security around the nations has come out as a benefit to the country. The actions the Government are taking may give off the impression that just about every
American hates them, A study showed that 52% of Americans were satisfied and felt safe with the new Immigration Laws and other Security procedure implemented after
9/11.
To conclude, understanding these major events and the solutions that the government took to further protect the United States can lead to additional solutions to reducing the rate of terrorism and with time can eradicate the issue. Each event can be used as an example of what to fix and improve to make the next situation more safe for people. First off, people need to find more effective ways of protecting the public while also looking out for a person’s Civil Liberties more than what they already attempt to accomplish. Security needs to be made easier and less inconvenient. Second, procedures and laws that are set to protect the public from security threats needs to be tweaked to where they work for the public’s needs more. Thus, lots of attention needs to be given to reducing and possibly eliminating the act of terrorism quickly within time if citizens of the United States plan to live in a country where they feel safe.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
each event. On the 9th of September 2001, people were ready to go to work like any other normal…
- 1402 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
Alexander, then director of the National Security Agency (NSA), told Congress more than 50 potential terrorist attacks had been thwarted by two controversial programs tracking more than a billion phone calls and vast swaths of Internet data each day. Additionally, the attacks on would-be targets such as the New York Stock Exchange were prevented by consuming telephone and Internet information from millions of Americans since September 11, 2001. In testimony, General Alexander said, "In recent years, these programs, together with other intelligence, have protected the U.S and our allies from terrorist threats across the globe to include helping prevent the potential terrorist events over 50 times since…
- 861 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
four Airliners and carried out suicide attacks against targets in the United States. Two of the…
- 1492 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
The negative consequences of the change may come in the form of Fourth Amendment challenges, and the idea that law enforcement is invading a person’s privacy, which is also protected by the Constitution, but do to the Patriot Act, this has allowed the government and criminal justice agencies to pry into a person’s business and life without consequence. Another negative aspect is the possibility that information can be abused, and according to the IACP “abuse can happen if such operations are not properly organized, focused, and directed” (2003).…
- 607 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
As an immediate result, many Muslims were detained even though many were U.S. citizens. Protests arose from the decision to attain these citizens in…
- 2096 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays -
2. USA Patriot Act gives the government powers to detain, search, watch, anyone based on suspicion. The government has also decided to try non-citizens in military tribunals instead of civilian courts.…
- 594 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The statement, “The Fourth Amendment protects people, not places,” is one of the most controversial statements in Criminal Procedure. The amendment’s purpose is to secure individuals’ rights to privacy within their houses, papers, and defends them against unreasonable searches and seizures. However, to what extent does the law preserve a person’s privacy? The Law of Search and Seizure and the Search Warrant, give the government strict to stipulations as to how they are able to rightfully obtain information that is presumed to be private. Although Searches, Seizures and Warrants seem to have simple guidelines, they are each intricate categories.…
- 581 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
There are many advantages for expanding governmental surveillance and investigative powers. For instance, there’s the possibility of gaining invaluable information for future attacks, and also the potential for targeting terrorists who may be responsible for such attacks. According to the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), “The FBI does not have to demonstrate probable cause, only declare it has “reasonable grounds” to suspect that library records may be relevant to an investigation.”…
- 392 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
right to search someone without a particular reason. With this law a lot of people have…
- 530 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The death toll of the attacks was 2,995, including the 19 hijackers. The overwhelming majority of…
- 549 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Kevin, Borgeson, Robin, Valeri. (2009). Terrorism in America. Published by Jones and Bartlett Publishers. Retrieved by Google Scholar at: http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=nuCGVxJGPs0C&oi=fnd&pg=PR11&dq=Terrorism+in+America&ots=cwrYl-sRmr&sig=TfFelxe-ZxGIdjkC1eMpPHGY9Bc#v=onepage&q=Terrorism%20in%20America&f=false.…
- 1045 Words
- 3 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Let’s start with what a search warrant is and how we can obtain one. A search warrant is a legal order that is signed by a judge or magistrate to give police officers the authorization to search a person or place for evidence. Search warrants allow you to search at a specific location at a specified time for specific items listed on the warrant. The officers must provide probable cause to the judge or magistrate and convince them that criminal activity has occurred and that there is probable cause that evidence of this crime that will be found at the location. There is an affidavit that must be filled out with written statements under oath that shows reports or observations from the police or undercover agents. If probable cause to support the Fourth Amendment is provided the magistrate or judge will issue the warrant needed.…
- 2087 Words
- 9 Pages
Better Essays -
The most significant amendment to the bill was The Patriotic Act of 2001 after the country faced the biggest attack from a foreign terrorist group. The United States Department of Justice announced that it would seek legislation that would give powers to state authorities to protect the homeland from such activities and attacks in the future. The proposed legislation was to give federal authorities the ability to monitor internet use, intercept emails and phone calls as well as wiretapping conversion between citizens and non citizens. The Act would also permit the detention of non citizens who are deemed to be dangerous to the home land (Center for American Progress 2005). This Act is by far one of the most controversial legislation in the history of the Congress. This paper looks to analyze the provisions of the Act as well as the pro and cons that came along.…
- 1756 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Developed “to deter and punish terrorist acts in the United States and around the world, to enhance law enforcement investigatory tools, and for other purposes” the USA Patriot Act, bears the formal name ‘‘Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (USA Patriot Act, 2001, p. 1). Heretofore referred to as the “Patriot Act” the USA Patriot Act was signed into law within 6 weeks from initial draft to final approval supporting the enforcement of laws for the ultimate protection of the United States and her citizens by granting access to persons and information with liberal criminal and civil procedure exceptions. The Patriot Act immediately granted broad-based interrogation, surveillance and isolation abilities to law enforcement when investigating “crimes against terror” (US Government, 2011)…
- 1282 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
Courts generally have held the law to be constitutional on its face as an appropriate exercise of authority to protect national security, though historically it has been subject to abuse if applied broadly to otherwise protected activities, such as the right to free speech, rendering it a particularly dangerous tool by which government authorities may silence speech that they consider to be contrary to government interests. Parts of the Patriot Act explicitly allow determinations to be made based on an individual's beliefs or speech. The Patriot Act threatens exclusion not only to those who provide direct support to such organizations as Antifa, but also to those who provide encouragement. This activity could have a devastating effect on the…
- 555 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays