Critical Studies on Terrorism
Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rter20
What's so ‘religious’ about ‘religious terrorism’?
Jeroen Gunning & Richard Jackson
a a b
School of Government and International Affairs, Durham University, Durham, UK b
Department of International Politics, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, UK Version of record first published: 16 Dec 2011.
To cite this article: Jeroen Gunning & Richard Jackson (2011): What's so ‘religious’ about ‘religious terrorism’?, Critical Studies on Terrorism, 4:3, 369-388 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2011.623405
PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-andconditions This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae, and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.
Critical Studies on Terrorism Vol. 4, No. 3, December 2011, 369–388
ARTICLE What’s so ‘religious’ about ‘religious terrorism’? Jeroen Gunninga,* and Richard Jacksonb
a School of Government and International Affairs, Durham University, Durham, UK; b Department of International Politics, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, UK
(Received 26 July 2011; ﬁnal version received 4 September 2011) This article assesses the validity of the concept of ‘religious terrorism’ and its consequences for research and policy practices. It explores the origins, assumptions and primary arguments of the term and subjects them to an analytical assessment. It argues that the distinctions typically drawn between ‘religious’ and ‘secular’ terrorism are problematic, both conceptually and empirically, and that the term is misleading in its typical assumptions about the motives, causes and behaviour of groups classiﬁed as ‘religious terrorist’. In particular, it shows that the behaviour of those thus labelled is so diverse, and often so indistinguishable from their ‘secular’ counterparts, that the term has little meaning without further qualiﬁcation, while simultaneously obscuring important aspects of both ‘religious’ and ‘secular’ violence. It then goes on to illustrate how the term, rooted in a particular historically situated understanding of religion and a particular set of power structures, serves as a disciplinary device to domesticate ‘political religion’, delegitimising certain actors while legitimising a number of highly contentious counterterrorist practices designed to deal with those described as ‘religious terrorists’. The article ends with some suggestions for alternative ways to study the role of beliefs and institutional structures, religious or otherwise, in producing political violence. Keywords: religion; violence; terrorism; secular; power
Downloaded by [126.96.36.199] at 08:19 09 November 2012
Introduction While scholarship linking religion and violence long predates 11 September 2001, the attacks on the United States elevated debates about ‘religious terrorism’, and in particular ‘Islamic terrorism’, to new heights. The term ‘religious...