Team Fun

Topics: Human resource management, Management, Evaluation Pages: 6 (790 words) Published: January 17, 2013
Title: TEAM FUN!
Time Context:Afternoon performance appraisal discussion Point of View: Bobby’s standards versus established stores standards.

Objectives:
To measure employee performance
To know the kind of standard that would be set in the stores To know what rating methodology will work for TEAM FUN!

Alternative Course of Action

ACA 1 - Absolute standards

An employee’s performance is measured against established standards. Evaluation is independent of any other employee.

Advantages
1. Reduce bias
2. Reduce distortion
3. Specific feedback leads to communicate

Disadvantage
1. Time Consuming
2. Not Quantifiable
3. Inefficient
4. Frustration from not knowing the right answers in forced choice

ACA 2 - Relative standards

Employees are evaluated by comparing their performance to the performance of other employees.

Advantages
1. Prevents rater from inflating their evaluations so that everyone looks good or average. 2. Each employee is evaluated against their co-employees.

Disadvantage
1. If in small population, raters tend to evaluate even an excellent employee as last place. 2. Difficult to accomplish if the employees are too many.

ACA 3

Using Achieved Outcomes to Evaluate Employees:
Formal approach is Management by Objectives (MBO) which is a performance appraisal method that includes mutual objective setting and evaluation based on the attainment of the specific objectives.

Advantages
1. Advantages are that it uses a results-oriented emphasis. It assists the planning and control functions and provides motivation. Employees know exactly what is expected of them and should have a greater commitment to goals that are mutually set.

Disadvantage

1. Disadvantages are that it will not work well where management has little trust in its employees. The MBO process is time-consuming. Finally, it may be difficult to measure whether the MBO activities are being carried out properly.

Decision Matrix for all ACA

| | |ACA 1 |ACA 2 |ACA 3 | |Criterion |Weight |Absolute Standards |Relative Standards |Using Achieve Outcomes | | | | | | | | | | | | | |ACCURACY |20% |15% |10% |15% | | | | | | | | | | | | | |FAIRNESS |20% |10% |10% |15% | | | | | | | | | | | | | |TIME |20% |5% |5% |15% | | | | | | | |...
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Week 4 Group Team and Conflict MGT 311 Essay
  • Resposibilities of a Team Leader Essay
  • Mgt 311 Team Strategy Essay
  • Leading and Developing a Work Team Essay
  • Essay about Fun Home
  • Effectiveness: Communication and Team Members Essay
  • Essay about Self Managed Teams
  • Essay about Handling Team Conflict with the General Procedural Model

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free