People who have the education and the drive to work in a certain industry shouldn’t be kept from pursuing their career because of ink. Tattoos aren’t all rebellious, those that are, are on rebellious people who you wouldn’t want working for you anyway. Body art doesn’t affect someone's ability to work: physically or mentally. Even though some customers may become offended at the bird on your wrist, there are plenty more that won’t care. Businesses will have more problems finding good workers if they continue to discriminate, tattoos are not all bad, and even though they may be for self-expression, tattoos do not define who someone is as an…
In the 1920’s undesirables were the only class to have tattoos. Those fully tattooed individuals where exposed in circuses and carnivals all over the country. Even after the depression, tattoos remained merely part of the sub-cultures; just morally dishonorable individuals, with little education worn tattoos. Bearing a tattoo represented an act of rebellion more than the expression of art. Is during the mid 1960’s, when a rebellious generation who challenged the rules of their parents and the society of those days arose, that tattooing became accepted in the country. As years passed, tattooing in the United States became a depart from the traditional, yet socially…
Throughout society tattoos and body piercings are often seen as dirty, irresponsible, and disgusting. The “fact that tattoos were once reserved only…
In our conclusion, we agree with Bonny Gainly. Everyone has the freedom to express theirselves. Any employer should not discriminate their employees’ base on their dressing style and cultural background. In support with this, according to the Federal Equal Employment Opportunity Law (EEO), that any applicants or employee should not be discriminated according with their marital status, culture, age, religious affiliation, gender and political views. We believe we cannot control tattoos and dressing style but we can put it in proper place. For instance, in a company who is more on customer service, the employees with tattoos can…
I. Thesis: Having a tattoo in the workplace doesn’t hinder you from doing your job; just some employers are looking for a reason not to hire a person.…
David Brooks’ “Nonconformity is Skin Deep” argument that tattooing is becoming a social trend is persuasive; he backs this by stating that tattoos are everywhere, inescapable. He wants us to assume that behind every judge, teacher, lawyer, housewife, etc lurks ink. Brooks makes a mockery of the “tattoo fad” by writing, “these are expressions of commitment…they don’t always work out…but the longing for permanence is admirable” (Brooks).…
There is always a lot of controversy when it comes to tattoos. Most people instantly have an opinion of them; they are either for or against tattoos. What is not realized is the fact that there is a ton of time and effort put into the sketching and placement of a tattoo. People tattoo themselves as a way of self-expression and liberation.…
To begin with, many people think discrimination has been long gone. Discrimination is still very relevant in today’s society. If you are declined a job because of something that’s apart of you, that’s discrimination. We have a little something here in the United States called the First Amendment, also known as Freedom of expression. Take note that it’s the “First” amendment, not the third or twenty-fifth, the first. That obviously means that freedom of expression is very important. So, if people express themselves by putting artwork on their body or piercing their skin, then why when we walk into work do we have to pretend like it is some big sin to have a marking on your body? That’s like telling someone they have to cover their birthmark up before they walk into work. If we are allowed to show our tattoos off in stores or in most public schools, then why should you have to cover them at work, when the first amendment tells us it’s okay to express ourselves? People say that having tattoos or piercings in a professional setting is unprofessional, but you can also say that having your hair long and curly is unprofessional. What’s the difference between having your ears pierced and having you nose or lip pierced? Frowning upon tattoos/ piercings in the workplace is simply unconstitutional.…
According to poll taken in 2003, in the United States thirty-six percent of people ages eighteen to twenty five have at least one tattoo and forty percent of people ages twenty-six to forty also have at least one tattoo. These statistics are far greater than the percentages from years ago. A poll from 1963 stated that only six percent of Americans in total had tattoos. Tattoos popularity is still growing here in the United States but all forms of this body art have been around for centuries.…
Cited: "Burger Chain Settles Religious-Bias Suit over Tattoos." HR.BLR.com. 16 Sept. 2005. Web. 18 Jan. 2011. <http://hr.blr.com/HR-news/Discrimination/Religious-Discrimination/Burger-Chain-Settles-Religious-Bias-Suit-over-Tatt/>.…
This paper focuses on the subject of whether or not tattoos and piercings should be allowed in the workplace. There are a lot of resources arguing that they should not be allowed, but this research maintains the point that they should be more accepted in the workplace these days. This paper concludes by discussing how tattoos and piercings are much more of an artistic expression rather than a form of rebellion as it was once considered.…
Tattoos have been around for a long time, and in today’s society they are considered unacceptable. We judge people with tattoos as thugs, people involved in gangs, or unprofessional. “The gang culture of the 1980s--its symbols, slang, tattoos, clothing style, hand signals and music--has trickled down to the next generation and into many suburbs” (Teen Gangs and Crime). Tattoos should not be something that people judge. Businesses discriminate people with tattoos most often. The workplace should allow tattoos unless they are disrespectful, as in knifes, skulls, and weapons. Tattoos are a way to express art, express someone’s heritage, and can be a way to remember special occasions.…
Companies that regulate a worker 's appearance, from banning tattoos to mandating makeup, are facing a growing risk of lawsuits, most employment lawyers assert. Appearance based discrimination lawsuits are being filed more frequently, involving everything from eyebrow rings to sexy clothing, employment attorneys say. The corporate loose white shirt is in the past, more and more, people look different and are entering the work force, and the tensions between culture and policy are going to escalate (Johnston & Shafer, 2006). Another cultural shift that is taking place is where managers are struggling to control a younger generation of workers who are more culturally and racially diverse than before. Therefore, the younger generation is more resistant to rules regulating their personal appearance (Osterman, 2005). Attorneys note that in recent years there 's been a rash of image-based lawsuits, including: The state of Nevada has a female bartender who is challenging a recent court ruling that upheld a casino 's right to fire her for refusing to wear makeup (Osterman, 2005). In Massachusetts, a former employee is challenging a retail giant’s prohibition on facial jewelry (King, Winchester, & Sherwyn, 2006). Most recently, a jury ruled against a university librarian, who allegedly was denied promotions because she was too attractive and did not fit the image of a librarian. The university claimed she was told that she was considered to be just a pretty girl who wore sexy outfits, and that 's why she wasn 't getting promoted. The attorney for the librarian argued that this was a case where his client didn 't fit the stereotype of the librarian (King, Winchester, & Sherwyn, 2006). Another lawyer is representing a women in an ongoing sex discrimination case against an entertainment conglomerate over a "personal best" policy that required women to wear makeup, she was fired for refusing to comply. The…
Long considered a hallmark of American deviance, the tattoo has undergone drastic redefinition in recent decades. No longer the purview of bikers, punks and thugs, tattooing is increasingly practiced and appropriated by mainstream, middle class individuals (DeMello 41; Irwin 50). For many young Americans, the tattoo has taken on a decidedly different meaning than for previous generations. Estimates on the number of Americans with tattoos generally range from one in ten to one in five (Kosut 1036; Stirn, Hinz, and Bráhler 533).…
Tattoos have been looked upon years ago as being for those of “low lives”, bikers or gang bangers, so to speak. But now tattoos have made a comeback to many as a form of art. People would now get tattoos for several different reasons; people get tattoos to express their lost for a loved one. It was said that ancient Hawaiians would tattoo their tongues as a sign of mourning when a loved on died. During the modern Western culture people would only get a tattoo as a sign of remembrance, nothing more. A similar reason is to remember a special event or to state their preference for one activity or another. Some say that it’s a way to declare oneself without saying a…