Preview

Symbolic Interactionism: Studies of Social Construction

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4495 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Symbolic Interactionism: Studies of Social Construction
Symbolic Interactionism: Studies of Social Construction
Hundreds of years before written word, theories have been made about words, the symbolism behind them, and root meanings assigned by social construction. William Shakespeare can be shown as example of this with posed questions by characters in his writings. In Romeo and Juliet, the character Juliet poses questions that reflect the symbolism of the name of her and her star-crossed lover Romeo.

“O Romeo, Romeo! Wherefore art thou Romeo. Deny thy father and refuse thy name; or, if thou wilt not, be but sworn my love, and I 'll no longer be a Capulet… 'Tis but thy name that is my enemy;--Thou art thyself, though not a Montague. What 's Montague? It is nor hand, nor foot, nor arm, nor face, nor any other part Belonging to a man. O, be some other name! What 's in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet; So Romeo would, were he not Romeo called, retain that dear perfection which he owes. Without that title:--Romeo, doff thy name; and for that name, which is no part of thee, take all myself.”
The intentions of Shakespeare were not to provide understanding of symbolic interactionism and to theorize, that was not of importance. However, it is viewed important by many in the realm of social psychology, thus, this paper to summarize and describe the concept and history of symbolic interactionism, give my analysis and evaluation to the current state of symbolic interactionism, and provide future directions for symbolic interactionism.
Understanding Symbolic Interactionism Social psychologist Herbert Blumer (1937) first coined the phrase “symbolic interactionism”. He claimed it to be a “somewhat barbaric” new term that in an offhand way had caught on in social science communities. Blumer’s first explanation behind the concept actually took place thirty-two years later in his book Symbolic Interactionism: Perspectives and Method.
Blumer’s concept of symbolic interactionism was



References: Anderson, L and Snow, D. (2001). Symbolic Interaction. Inequality and the Self: Exploring Connections from an Interactionist Perspective, Vol. 24, Issue 4, 395-406 Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Hall. Blumer, H. (2004). George Herbert Mead and Human Conduct. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press Griffin, E. (2006). A First Look at Communication Theory.(6th Ed.) New York: McGraw Hill. DeGloma, T. (2007). Symbolic Interaction. The Social Logic of “False Memories”: Symbolic Awakenings and Smbolic Worlds in Survivor Retractor Narratives, Vol. 30, Issue 4, 543-565 Shakespeare, W. (1999). Romeo and Juliet. Retrieved March 8, 2008, from http://www.theplays.org/romeo/ Turner, J. (2007). Symbolic Interaction. Self, Emotions, and Extreme Violence: Extending Symbolic Interactionist Theorizing, Vol. 30, Issue 4, 501-530 Ulmer, J. and Wilson, M. (2003). Symbolic Interaction. The Potential Contributions of Quantitative Research to Symbolic Interactionism, Vol. 26, Issue 4, 531-552 Williams, C. (2006). Symbolic Interaction. Shopping as Symbolic Interaction: Race, Class, and Gender in the Toy Store, Vol. 28, Issue 4, 459-472

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Sociology and Coffee

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Symbolic interactionism is a social theoretical approach established by George Mead, which emphasizes the importance of symbols and language in understanding the social world. This theoretical theory first allows us to derive the symbolic meanings coffee has on society. Coffee is often viewed as a beverage for energy. It’s often drunk in the morning for means of getting drive after one has woken from sleep, or during the day when one is having a tiresome day, or sometimes after the consumption of alcohol to sober up. All these symbols can be used to identify the nature of coffee consumption within society. These symbols can lead to the social interaction, which George Mead said, involved the exchange of symbols. People can understand a person’s state of mind and mood when they see them drinking coffee, because coffee is capable of symbolizing certain moods. When people see one another drinking coffee before conversing, in Mead’s theory, it’s the exchange of symbols, in this case how one is feeling at that moment. After understanding one another, the people then can start talking in the manner in which they want to.…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The symbolic interactionist perspective which is known as symbolic interactionism directs sociologist to consider the symbols and details of everyday life, what these symbols mean, and how people interact with each other(1). George H. Mead Introduced this perspective to American sociology in the 1920s. According to this theory people attach meaning to symbols. An example of symbols are wedding bands, vows of life-long commitment, a white bridal dress, a wedding cake, a church ceremony, and flowers and music. These are all examples of symbols explain in the theory. Symbolic interactionist may miss the larger issue of society by focusing too closely on the “trees.” An example would be focusing too strongly on the size of the diamond in the wedding ring rather than the “forest,” which would be the quality of marriage.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tuesdays with Morrie

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The symbolic interactionism is an excellent sociological perspective that allows us to focus on micro activities and to analyze our society which is the product of everyday’s life. Tuesdays with Morrie is more than a simple book, more than a romance one; it is a great book that teaches us many of life’s greatest lessons. An analysis of this book using the SI perspective and concepts such as meaning making, status, impression management, looking-glass self, role taking, role making, and self-presentation helps us understand the real meaning of Morrie’s words and lessons.…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Introduction of Sociology

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages

    * Symbolic Interactionism: According to the symbolic interaction’s perspective, people attach meanings to symbols, and then they act according to their subjective interpretation of these symbols. Conversation is an interaction of symbols between individuals who constantly interpret the world around them. Of course, anything can serve as a symbol as long as it refers to something beyond itself. However, with the example about applying Symbolic Interactionism to U.S. marriages and divorces over time, this perspective just shows the slighting the influence of social forces and institutions on individual interactions.…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    suck it up

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This article uses the symbolic interaction theory. The symbolic meaning that people develop behavior and rely upon the process of social interaction. In the article Joseph refers to…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Symbolic Interactionism is the analysis of an individual’s interaction while in another person’s presence (face-to-face) and the usage of symbols created in social life. With different groups of people fighting for equality in the most recent years same-sex couples have been fighting for the rights of being legally married to their partners.…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    3. Symbolic Paradigm-Symbolic Interactionism describes society as small groups of individuals interacting based on the various ways that people interpret their various cultural symbols such as spoken, written, and non-verbal language. Our behavior with and among other people (our interaction) is the result of our shared understanding of cultural symbols. This is a micro-level paradigm that describes small-scale processes and small-scale social systems; it is interested in individual behavior. The core question:…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Symbolic Interaction focuses on the relationships between symbols and interactions (West, 2004). The Symbolic Interaction Theory gives a reference to how people act and behave with symbolic meanings they find within given situations. The interactions with these symbols, in turn forms relationships around individuals. The overall goal of any interactions with one another is to create shared meanings toward objects, feelings, and each other. Some of the key points in the Symbolic Interaction Theory are as follows: individuals act toward each other based on the meaning and relationship those others have for them; meaning is created through the interactions individuals have in sharing personal interpretations of symbols; meanings are modified through a process of creating meaning and discussing it with others; self-concepts are developed through interactions with others; cultural and social processes influence individuals.…

    • 2176 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Symbolic interactionism was developed in the 1960’s and was exemplified mainly by George Mead’s student Herbert Blumer (Conley, 2011). Symbolic interactionism focuses mainly on smaller, more face-to-face interactions or microsociology unlike many other theories such as functionalism (Conley, 2011). The main idea of symbolic interactionism is that people act in response to the meanings that are assigned to them. For example a yellow stoplight means to slow down and prepare to stop (Conley, 2011). Erving Goffman’s dramaturgical theory was one of the base theories behind symbolic interactionism. This theory uses theatrical terms to explain how we act and then change how we act based on the responses we receive in our encounters in society (Conley, 2011). The idea of this theory involves a front stage and a backstage. Front stage is the performance or real life interaction with others while the backstage is where you practice for the front stage in order to save yourself from embarrassment. Another major theory of symbolic interactionism is the labeling theory. The labeling theory involves the forming of an individual’s self-identity…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The origin of the symbolic-interactionist theory traces back to Max Weber and his assertion that people act in accordance to their interpretation of the meaning of their world. The first perspective is Symbolic Interactionism perspectives, tells sociologist to think about the details of everyday life and what it means to each other. It address the subject meanings of human’s acts and the processes through which people come to develop and communicate shared meanings.(essentials of sociology book) There are three major assumptions behind symbolic Interaction theory, the first assumptions, “meaning are important”, meaning any movement can mean so many things, like when they say a picture can say a thousand words. Different people can have different means when looking at the same thing, without even saying anything. Another example is giving someone a hug; it depends on who is receiving the hug and for what the reason for giving one. The second assumption behind symbolic Interaction theory, “meaning grow out of relationships” that when relationships change so do their meanings. Meaning, that when someone get married their relationship is a happy and joyful and think that love will keep their marriage forever, then when they get a divorce its seems that love is nothing but pain, and probably feel like they will never fell that same way…

    • 1506 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    words, it means symbols have an attached meaning that effect the way we view the…

    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main concept of symbolic interactionism is that “symbols-things to which we attach meaning-are the key to understanding how we view the world and communicate with one another”. Symbolic interactionism focuses on face-to-face interaction within society. Symbols dedicate meaning to relationships and even society itself. Symbolic interactionists like, George Herbert Mead and Charles Horton Cooley, analyze how societies use symbols to determine meaning, view the…

    • 1890 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I chose symbolic interaction also referred to as the interactionist perspective. Symbolic interaction is defined as a sociological approach that generalizes about everyday forms of social interaction to explain society as a whole. George Herbert Mead introduced this perspective in the 1920s. Symbolic interaction has three parts including meaning, language, and symbols. The theory applies to society today because people act based on symbolic meanings they find within a given situation. Communication between people is immensely important for a functioning society. Being informed and having understanding of others could avoid conflicts.…

    • 244 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Coupled with, each society and/or family can decide what is right or wrong for them. Symbolic interactionism examines how ideas, beliefs, and attitudes form the daily lives of people including those of their family. It Is often difficult for women to go beyond or be successful rather in business when they are considering to go for a raise or to have kids as it was indicated in the media. By the same token, they would have to take…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Blumer and symbolic interactionism: He propos es 3 fundamental premises. (1) “Human beings act as toward things on the basis of the meanings which theses things have for them”. Meanings are not intrinsically in things in the world; they have to be defined before they have any human reality. This applies to other human beings, social organizations, to ideals, as well as physical objects themselves. Everything that people act upon or that has an impact upon them must go through the process of subjective meaning. (2)”The meaning of a thing for a person grows out of the ways in which other persons act toward the person with regard to the thing” Meaning is not merely individual and subjective, but social. (3) “The use of meanings by the actor occurs through a process of interpretation”. Meanings are handled flexibly as actions are worked out. The…

    • 1822 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays