Preview

Sun Tsu V.S Jomini

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1107 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Sun Tsu V.S Jomini
As Gen. George Washington learned of British occupation of Yorktown, Va., under the leadership of Gen. Cornwallis, he laid out careful plans to take the Chesapeake Bay and bring it back into control of the Continental Congress. The strategy lay out by Washington and his allies from the French Army, lead to the successful capture of Chesapeake Bay and surrendering of Cornwallis and his forces, thus bring to the American Revolutionary War. As defined in the US Army 's Field Manual 3-0, strategy "is the art and science of developing and employing armed forces and other instruments of national power in a synchronized fashion to secure national or multinational objectives." (FM 3-0, 2-4) This definition, broad in its description of how a leader-commander, general, or any other title of a person in charge- plans to win a battle or war, sets in full the implementation of historical figures, such as Sun Tsu and Baron Antoine Henri de Jomini, outlook and defining of strategically warfare.
Sun Tsu, known as Master Sun, is more of a strategic thinker; unlike Jomini on the other hand was more of a tactical thinker. From Sun Tsu years of battles passing down his wisdom, wrote a book called The Art of War. His strategy was mostly focused in China. His book has given guidance to many military theorists throughout time. Sun Tsu appeal has gone beyond military realm into the world of business. His principles are suited to completive business situations. He is the best known of the military specialist and best described as a pragmatic realist. “War is a virtual matter of state; the road that leads to either survival or ruin” (Sun-Tsu, [1993]: 103). Sun Tsu first aim for the strategist the avoidance of defeat, in other words “achieve victory without war,” (Holmes) but one cannot make a virtue of culture ignorance. Sun Tsu’s theory of war is marked by balance between complementary principles and forces; war is a balance between art and science making much of the utility of



Cited: Loo, Benard. The Future of Strategic Studies. Holmes, Colleen. What Chinese Learned from Sun-Tsu. 2000. Ettrich, Brian. The Principles of War: Are They Still Applicable. Monterey CA. 2005. Gray, Colin. Out of the Wilderness: Prime Time for Strategic Culture. 2006 http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/jel/service_pubs/fm3_0a.pdf. pg. 30 2-2

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The promise of immediate reinforcements also caused Cornwallis to compromise his intent for the established fortifications. Under the principles of Mission Command, a Commander must convey the purpose of the overall mission and an understanding of the subordinate’s role. This also allows lower level leaders to coordinate efforts toward the desired outcome. When Cornwallis originally chose Yorktown as a naval station, he knew it was not an ideal location and failed to plan for a possible…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Written by Chinese tactician Sun Tzu, the Art of War presents the basic principles of warfare and gives military leaders advice and instructions on when and how to fight. The Art of War is written in a very simple and direct manner. Sun Tzu’s work can easily be grasped and his principles understood. There is however a strong sense of morality required to achieving success with these principles. Approached in a holistic and integrated way, each principle is interlocked with the others to form a sum greater than its parts in a direct and concise…

    • 96 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The British believed the only way they could win was if they moved quickly, so to win and move quickly at the same time British used the following strategies that they thought would have helped them succeed in the war. General Howe had two strategies he used, his first strategy was sending a huge number of troops into New York city trying to show the americans that if they could separate New England from the South that the Americans had no chance of winning. His second strategy was that he invited delegates from the continental congress to a peace conference, he said if the Americans surrendered and swore loyalty to the king those who did so would be pardoned. After many time of negotiating with General Howe the Americans decided to talk any…

    • 164 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The strategic key was to keep the Continental Army unscathed as an effective fighting force.15 Washington stated that as long as he held the Continental Army together, the British could not have won the war.16 As a result, the Battle of Bunker Hill became a basis of comparison for future battles, one being the Battle of Long Island. For this battle, Washington had its defenses constructed into a honeycomb of connected forts, redoubts, and trenches, which was expressed as a Bunker Hill on steroids.17 However, the British eventually learned from their humiliating mistake at Bunker Hill and developed counter strategies to the American’s strategy of defensive positions. Reluctantly, Washington often called for retreats as they were the best option rather than getting crushed to a pulp by the British forces. This battle was one where Washington had to perform one of the most brilliant and tactical withdrawals in the annals of military history.18…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Who intuitively created a plan to attack and ultimately made General Cornwallis surrender and ignite the independence of the American Colonies. “Washington’s secretary writes in his journal during the first three days of battle [September] 28. A most wonderful and very observable coincidence of favorable circumstances having concentered our various and extended preparations, the army commences its march from Williamsburg and approaches within two miles of York Town. The enemy on our approach makes some show of opposition from their cavalry, but upon our bringing up some field pieces and making a few shot, they retire, and we take a quiet position for the night. [September] 29.…

    • 1439 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bunker Hill Winner

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The British partially accomplished their strategy, they ultimately won Bunker Hill. Like the Americans, the British had the goal to control Bunker Hill, but they also wanted to expand their control past Boston to Charlestown. Their plan started with the thought of controlling high ground. Other British men had the thought of trying…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    General Charles Cornwallis led several successful early campaigns during the American Revolution, securing British victories at New York, Brandywine and Camden. Logan reports that In 1781, as second in command to Gen, Henry Clinton, he moved his forces to Virginia, where he was defeated at the Battle of Yorktown. Continental General Horatio Gates. “Despite his successes on the battlefield, it has been said that General Horatio Gates was suspected of having very little personal courage when it came to fighting. He is perhaps most noted for being in regular competition with General George Washington and hatching a plan to have him removed as commander-in-chief of the Continental Army” says Pamela…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the American Revolution many strategies and tactics were used by the colonist. Specifically, the colonist used guerilla warfare, they had geographic advantages, and the colonist were a popular support. In general, those reasons are why the patriots won the war, but the main strategy for winning the American Revolution is the tactic of foreign relations.…

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    What led to the Battle of Yorktown? The beginning is not as clear as many would like to think. General Cornwallis was campaigning for the majority of the American Revolution in the southern states. He ravaged many of the southern states with his army in order to move toward achieving his main goal of the campaign; disrupting the supply lines that Washington was using and isolating the Franco-American forces. However, in Virginia, Marquis de Lafayette a young Frenchmen who led the American and French troops did not decisively engage the British. Lafayette had roughly 3,000 soldiers to defend Virginia while the British had around 7,000. During this time, Cornwallis received orders from the British Commander-in-Chief, Sir Henry Clinton, to take up a position in the Virginia peninsula where Yorktown was located. The goal was to set up a naval post to receive supplies and reinforcements from the Royal Navy. It was unknown at this time that Cornwallis was setting himself up for failure in Yorktown.…

    • 2195 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Clausewitz's Theory Of War

    • 1853 Words
    • 8 Pages

    While many scholars attempted to theorize war in human history, only few were credited for constructing consistent theories on which people could base and further their understanding of war and warfare. Those include Greek Thucydides, Chinese Sun Tzu, and Indian Kautilya all three from 3-4th century BC; Prussian Carl von Clausewitz and Swiss Antoine-Henry Jomini both from 19th century. All of those prominent theorist had a lot to offer and therefore had great influence on our thinking in war, warfare, and strategy. However, Clausewitz’s theory offers more insight if one carefully and purposely studied the “paradoxical trinity” identified in his…

    • 1853 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Who Won the War of 1812

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages

    America had one strategy and one strategy only. Attack and stop at nothing that the British fired at you. The British wanted to be offensive but as soon as they saw the Americans always initiating every battle, the Generals of the British decided to let them attack but put up strong defense and then when they get tired of waging war, then Britain will know their strategy and their weak points and be able to attack with full force. Britain was extremely wise in making this decision because although at first, when the news gets around Britain keeps retreating, to regular people, Britain is a coward but when they whip out their best weapons and refreshed fighters then, only then will you realize their strategy all along.…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Continental Armies strategy was very effective. George Washington developed a strategy of ‘avoiding large-scale confrontations with the royal army (which) made it impossible for the British to deliver a knock-out blow.’…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Military theory spans centuries of conflict all across the world. As such, military theorists have written in a variety of military climates, varying from the absence of gun powder to the presence of nuclear weapons. However, some military theories are transcendent. Some elements of Sun Tzu and Clausewitz are eternally wise. While their similarities may become universal truths, their differences are equally worthy of study because, it is in the differences where choices are made. Sun Tzu and Clausewitz agreed that war is chaos, military action is a tool for diplomatic goals and, as such, the results of warfare are not final. Their differences lie in how they advocate for waging war. The style and preparations for war contrast. This is where…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Washington shows his tactics and wit during the December 1776 Christmas day battle in Trenton. After many loses, George Washington needed a victory to impel his soldiers to reenlist in his army. Because of his cleverness Washington concluded that the paid and un-motivated soldiers, the Hessians in Trenton would be celebrating Christmas and this was the perfect time to attack and boost his army’s self esteem ( Hobart Article on the Battle of Trenton). On Christmas night, Washington figured out a plan to cross the Delaware River and surprise attack the Hessian Soldiers. Washington and his troops attacked at three points early in the morning of December 26th when the Hessians were sleeping and drunk from the night of celebrating ( Hobart Article on the Battle of Trenton) . This was a smart and quick call that boosted the American spirit and captured more than 900 Hessian men ( Hobart Article on the Battle of Trenton) .Another example of George Washington's great tactics was during the Siege of Yorktown. Originally George Washington was planning to attack New York, but with the aid of Francois De Grasse, George Washington changed his course to attack Yorktown,where General Cornwallis was conveniently waiting for supplies from New York (Hobart Article on the Battle of Yorktown). George Washington knew this would be a great time to attack and win a battle. On October…

    • 1737 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    in wu shu, or martial art. Sun Wu also has a courtesy name, Chang Qing.…

    • 13283 Words
    • 54 Pages
    Powerful Essays