Preview

Summary of Flat Cargo Bhd

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
759 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary of Flat Cargo Bhd
FLAT CARGO BERHAD: AN AUDITOR’S CONUNDRUM
The case portrayed Flat Cargo Berhad (FCB), a public listed company which known as one of the largest air freight companies in Malaysia. FCB was registered as an investment holding company with several subsidiaries where the subsidiaries primarily provides air freight services and aircraft ground handling services. As the only Intra-Asian overnight express cargo operator based in Malaysia, FCB provides air freight transportation involving aircraft charter and leasing. Due to landing rights in Asia Pacific region, FCB has the opportunity to provide express air services to international integrators, freight forwarders and major airlines within the Asian region. Thus, secure its major landing rights throughout countries in Asia.
Moreover, FCB also has well-established customers and offers air freight forwarding services to its major shareholder, Cargo Malaysia Berhad and Bangor Berhad. Meanwhile, FCB was engaged with expansion plan to handle large shipments by expending freighter fleet size in order to cater customers demand. In 2005, FCB’s turnover is expected to be higher than year 2004 due to its expansion plan. However, FCB has higher gearing ratio and weak debt servicing ability. Besides, FCB has governance structure which adhered to the Malaysian Code of Corporate Governance in configuring its Board of Directors.
Based on the case, Mr. Chuah Mun Soong is identified as a protagonist where he is one of FCB’s audit team from Kencana & Associates. The main problem here is the dilemma of Mr. Chuah Mun Soong where he thinks that there is a possibility of fraud in FCB. This is because they have identified the suspicious findings during the routine financial audit. As an auditor, he needs to be skepticism and he tried to access the fraud by doing some research on the company. He decided to consult legal department for the advice. He is unwilling to risk his firm reputation by having client that has scandal. However he hopes

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Study 5.1

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Description: Smith is the Chairman of Cardillo Travel Agency, he just involved into a case that whether to sign the affidavit with United Airlines. Because he inspected that there is something wrong with the affidavit concerning Cardillo’s stockholders’ equity, so that he refused to sign affidavit. Just for this reason, he was kicked out from his position. Moreover, the other two of his executives Rognlien and Lawrence, just approved the $203,000 adjusting entry recorded link to Airlines-Cardillo transaction. Afterward, Helen Shepherd, an auditor of Touch Ross, found the mistake that the money cannot be recorded for the payment to Cardillo was refundable under certain conditions and thus not immediately as revenue, so she questioned Rognlien and Lawrence, but they still insisted the entry of the money has been properly recorded. And one year later, R and L just dismissed the Touch Ross accounting firm and hire KMG as their public accounting firm. After the turnover of KMG, they just founded this matter too, and resigned as the independent audit firm.…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Wedtech Scandal

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Auditing failure is also a key factor contributing to the Wedtech scandal. It is presented as a result of independence of auditing reporting and confirmation.On the one hand, even if auditors complied with auditing process on the surface (Berg and barbanel, 1987), they are not independent since they were bribed to forge auditing reports.In 1982, Wedtech employed the Main Hurdman to financially audit its financial statementswhen it went to Initial Public Offerings. One of the auditing partners, Richard Bluestinefound a serious fact in auditing that two directors had transiting company’s money to their private accounts. However, he accepted a bribe from the two directors, which includes 9% of company’s shares and $900,000 low interest loans. Furthermore, Anthony Guariglia , the other auditing partner,was also bribed with 1.5% shares and a job position in Wedtech with high payment. In return, both of them covered up their financial crimes in the report and reported to SBA that the invoice falsification was only a minor infringe to the law and had been corrected by the managers.On the other hand, the legal confirmation of the auditing statement lacked independence,as the law firm named Ellenoff, Plesent& Lehrer, who issued this confirmation letter, was bribed by Wedtech (Deleon, 1993). Hence it is highly probable that the letter of confirmation was not reliable.…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a COO, Fletcher Anderson had interaction with F&C`s independent auditors. He and controller supposed to provide all the documents and answer all the questions of the independent auditors but they didnot tell them about the fraud of the company.…

    • 1456 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Jamaica Water Properties

    • 1703 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The case is about an accounting fraud that involves the Jamaica Water Properties, Inc. This fraud was discovered by David Sokol, who was at that time served as COO (Chief Operating Officer) of the Jamaica Water Properties, Inc. The main culprit was Ernest Grendi, JWP’s CFO, helped by several of the company’s senior accountants. Moreover, the company’s external auditor, Ernst & Young, seems to be involved as well. This case will show regarding the auditor independence, its duty as professional accountant, fraud, and the perspective from the employees toward their higher-ups management.…

    • 1703 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Description: Smith is the Chairman of Cardillo Travel Agency, he just involved into a case that whether to sign the affidavit with United Airlines. Because he inspected that there is something wrong with the affidavit concerning Cardillo’s stockholders’ equity, so that he refused to sign affidavit. Just for this reason, he was kicked out from his position. Moreover, the other two of his executives Rognlien and Lawrence, just approved the $203,000 adjusting entry recorded link to Airlines-Cardillo transaction. Afterward, Helen Shepherd, an auditor of Touch Ross, found the mistake that the money cannot be recorded for the payment to Cardillo was refundable under certain conditions and thus not immediately as revenue, so she questioned Rognlien and Lawrence, but they still insisted the entry of the money has been properly recorded. And one year later, R and L just dismissed the Touch Ross accounting firm and hire KMG as their public accounting firm. After the turnover of KMG, they just founded this matter too, and resigned as the independent audit firm.…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Phar Mor Case

    • 8484 Words
    • 34 Pages

    In December 1995, the flamboyant entrepreneur Michael "Mickey" Monus, formerly president and chief operating officer (COO) of the deep-discount retail chain PharMor, Inc., was sentenced to 19 years and seven months in prison. Monus was convicted for the accounting fraud that inflated Phar-Mor's shareholder equity by $500 million, resulted in over $1 billion in losses, and caused the bankruptcy of the twenty-eighth largest private company in the United States. The massive accounting fraud went largely undetected for nearly six years. Several members of top management confessed to, and were convicted of, financial-statement fraud. Former members of Phar-Mor management were collectively fined over $1 million, and two former Phar-Mor management employees received prison sentences. Phar-Mor's management, as well as Phar-Mor creditors and investors subsequently brought suit against Phar-Mor's independent auditors, Coopers & Lybrand LLP (Coopers), alleging Coopers was reckless in performing its audits. At the time the suits were…

    • 8484 Words
    • 34 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    F&C International

    • 1697 Words
    • 7 Pages

    As a COO, Fletcher had interaction with F&C`s independent auditors. Fletcher and controller was supposed to provide all the documents and answer all the questions requested of the independent auditors but they didn’t tell them about the fraud of the company.…

    • 1697 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The fraud risk factors could be identified as incentives/pressures, opportunities, and attitudes/rationalization in fraud triangle. According to the case, Peregrine’ control environment had an essential issue on separation of duties. In PFG, only Russell Wasendorf could open the real bank balance, which gave the opportunity to Wasendorf. Peregrine was suffer from a huge loss in operations, which gave incentive to Wasendorf. He needed to decide whether fraud or bankrupt. Peregrine’s philosophy and operating style was “either predator or prey”, which shown the attitude of Wasendorf was aggressive and he could not afford of bankrupt. As a result, Peregrine had incentive, opportunity and attitude to commit fraud.…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    chicken run

    • 2049 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Decision Maker: Credit Controller Ms Choy is the decision maker as she has the responsibility to make the right decision regarding unethical conduct of Encik Selamat, she can convince Board of Directors about En. Selamat. If she failed to convince BOD to take action, she can then reveal the issue to the auditor, besides mentioning to the auditor the lack of segregation of duty in the business operation. She can execute and monitor implementation and performance of employees under her responsibility and convince her friend, Puan Azura to do the same.…

    • 2049 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Case Study

    • 1318 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Established in 2002 in Taiping, Perak, Palm Haul Sdn Bhd (PHSB) was a small and medium sized enterprise in the Crude Palm Oil (CPO) transportation business. PHSB was managed by En. Rossly, the Chief Executive Officer which is also the son-in-law of PHSB’s founder, Datuk S. Najeed. Like the other transport companies involved in the business, PHSB also faced problems with its drivers embroiling in oil piracy. Transport companies are naturally will held the responsibility for such thefts as they usually take place under their watch and these companies are bound to compensate the refineries for such losses. The culprits involved frequently tanker drivers, depot operators and transporters. One of the major customer of PHSB, Oilene Refineries (Oilene) complaint about the quality of the CPO delivered by PHSB and its later impact on Oilene’s failure to fulfil their customer orders. This is because of the practice of siphoning CPO and adulterating the consignment with water, used oil or sludge was so uncontrolled that a number of PHSB’s customers have threatened to change their custom to other more reliable transport companies. Besides that, profits for the first quarter of 2009 had drastically decrease compared to the same period on the previous year due to the high compensation expenses and maintenance cost. These matters worried Datuk Najeed whom then insisted En. Rossly inspect the matters and report to him within one week with possible solutions. En. Rossly then asked his university friend, Mukhriz Mohd, a management consultant to assist him with Datuk Najeed’s task.…

    • 1318 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Flat Cargo Berhad

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages

    FCB obtained listing in Bursa Malaysia on the 15 September 2001. The main core business was to provide air freight transportation within the Asian region. As a fast growing company, FCB secured agreements from well-establish company within the transportation industry such as Worldwide Express, United Parcel Services (UPS), Nationwide Express, City link and others.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Summary Flat Cargo Bhd

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The protagonist or decision-maker in this case is Mr Chuah Mun Soong, auditor from Kencana & Associates which responsible to make a financial audit for Flat Cargo Berhad (FCB). In 2006, while prepare audit work for Flat Cargo Berhad, the auditors discover several suspicious result which lead to delay a decision in finalizing the auditor’s report. Mr Chuah had been informed by his subordinates that there had been inconsistencies in the accounts of Flat Cargo Berhad. Mr Chuah needs to gain more information from the company in order to inform his boss, Mr Keong Chee Wah about the situation occur in the client’s company. Mr Chuah was in dilemma because he wants to keep good the…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Transmile

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Top executives of Transmile Group Bhd may have been aware of the overstatement of the group's sales figures when the unaudited annual accounts for financial year ended Dec 31, 2006 (FY06) were released to Bursa Malaysia on Feb 15, sources say. Transmile's external auditor Messrs Deloitte & Touche is said to have alerted the management, namely chief executive officer Gan Boon Aun, chief financial officer Lo Chok Ping and the audit committee on the inaccuracy of the substantially high revenue of RM989.2mil for FY06. However, it is believed the matter was not taken to the board level. Chairman of the audit committee Chin Keem Feung is also an independent director.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Accounting Fraud

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages

    RM530 million Transmile accounting fraud – how Liong Sik is to assume responsibility as Chairman?…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 2013, China Metal Recycling Ltd. was accused by The Security and Future Commission in Hong Kong as it was involved in accounting fraud. It exaggerated accounts for loan, land and its warehouse receipts in its public offering financial statements for 2009. Also, its main subsidiary’s revenue was deliberately inflated according to powerful evidence. As a result, the CEO, Jacky Chun, was arrested because of irresponsibility of proper records on purpose, and some auditors related violated Professional Accounting Ordinance due to publicizing the annual reports with false information.…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays