Strategic Plan Critique Paper
The following document contains the consolidated feedback that members of Team C provided to each other as the final individual assignments for the strategic plans were completed. This was a useful tool in providing a peer review prior to the final submission of the individual assignment. This task allowed each team member the opportunity to provide recommendations for others to enhance their own papers as well as provide some insight on areas where our own papers could be best finalized.
K.’s Feedback for the Team
Patricia:
The background and executive summary of the paper lay a good foundation for the strategic analysis. I noticed that there were a number of grammatical errors throughout the paper which is to be expected with a rough draft. It might be good to go over the paper 2-3 times to check for errors. Your paper is a tad bit verbose and the conclusion has not been added yet. Your paper is informative and well researched and does an excellent job of developing ideas and concepts. Reducing the word limit might eliminate some of your ideas so chose carefully which sections of the paper are eliminated. Sabrina:
You are off to a great start in terms of the information that you have gathered about the company. From the paper I assumed that you have some affiliation with the company, but I not sure if we are supposed to write in the first person for this assignment. This is something that perhaps should be discussed with the professor to make sure that you don 't lose points. You 're SWOT analysis is strong and should serve as a great aid as you finalize the remainder of your paper. I also would like to suggest that you refer to the APA format for citing sources, but I know this is a rough draft you may have already realized that. I also did not see a vision statement for H&R Block. Your paper shows great promise and should yield a good mark. Suzanne:
You paper is well researched and has a concise flow which makes it easy to read and
K.’s Feedback for the Team
Patricia:
The background and executive summary of the paper lay a good foundation for the strategic analysis. I noticed that there were a number of grammatical errors throughout the paper which is to be expected with a rough draft. It might be good to go over the paper 2-3 times to check for errors. Your paper is a tad bit verbose and the conclusion has not been added yet. Your paper is informative and well researched and does an excellent job of developing ideas and concepts. Reducing the word limit might eliminate some of your ideas so chose carefully which sections of the paper are eliminated. Sabrina:
You are off to a great start in terms of the information that you have gathered about the company. From the paper I assumed that you have some affiliation with the company, but I not sure if we are supposed to write in the first person for this assignment. This is something that perhaps should be discussed with the professor to make sure that you don 't lose points. You 're SWOT analysis is strong and should serve as a great aid as you finalize the remainder of your paper. I also would like to suggest that you refer to the APA format for citing sources, but I know this is a rough draft you may have already realized that. I also did not see a vision statement for H&R Block. Your paper shows great promise and should yield a good mark. Suzanne:
You paper is well researched and has a concise flow which makes it easy to read and