Stem Cell Research: Should we continue to allow scientists to create new embryonic stem cell lines?
Good morning everyone. The topic of Stem Cell Research has been argued over by politicians, scientists and people all over the world for over a decade. Scientists should not be allowed to continue to create new embryonic stem cell lines.
One of the ways to obtain stem cells for scientific research is to destroy a blastocyst (laboratory-fertilized human egg). Destroying the blastocyst is the equivalent of murder or ending a human life. Life begins at conception, and the destruction of this pre-born life is morally unacceptable and not justifiable. Even if the outcome of extracting these stem cells can be beneficial by saving or reducing suffering for generations in the future, destroying an embryo that is a few days old is simply an immoral thing to do. Maybe that blastocyst that was destroyed would have developed into an adult who would find an alternative way to try and cure diseases like Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s, Diabetes, Heart disease and strokes. Taking that risk is not worth it. Diseases like these should be curedTampering with human life is erroneous and avoidable. Destroying the blastocyst may be considered as "Humans trying to play God". An anonymous individual spoke about the destruction of the blastocyst for scientific purposes and said "A life is a life and that should never be compromised. A fertilized egg should be valued as a human life even if it is in its very first weeks. Destroying human life in the hopes of saving human life is not ethical."
Another reason scientists should not be allowed to continue to create new embryonic stem cell lines is because there are alternative ways to retrieve stem cells. There are four main sources for obtaining stem cells - adult cells, cord cells, embryonic cells and baby teeth cells. Instead of using blastocyst’s to retrieve stem cells, scientists can extract adult cells from bone marrow or the peripheral...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document