Standing with the International Community Against Genocide

Only available on StudyMode
  • Download(s) : 118
  • Published : May 6, 2013
Open Document
Text Preview
A reigning topic of discussing in the United States is our involvement in the International Community and the prevention of genocide. Many options have been considered, but there is currently no official solution for the debate of joining or not. Some of the deciding factors regard whether or not it will assist the economy, military, and legal standpoints of the United States. If the United States joins together with the International Community, the economy will benefit from the support efforts, the military will benefit with the production of war supplies and technology, and from a legal standpoint, and it will ensure the human rights of all people. By joining the International Community, the United States’ economy would not be directly affected if genocide would occur that needs to be stopped. “In the beginning of the war, 1941, the national income was around $95 billion, but by 1944, it rose to $150 billion” (World War). During World War II, the income rates drastically went up, due to the financial support of war allies. These income rates include house and financial incomes for the average family. “The Employment Act of 1946 stated as government policy "to promote maximum employment, production, and purchasing power"(World). In 1946, the Employment Act was drafted to improve the employment of the average man, as well as employment for women. As most of the men went off to war, the women stayed behind and worked, which created a great workforce for the country. “Wars have influenced technological developments. Above all, recurring war has improved markets and economic growth” (Remember). Although engaging in war is not always the answer, being involved in war with other countries can lead to technology advances. If the United States joins together with a country that may have a new type of technology, the military can learn from that and gain new sources of weaponry, as well as benefit the trade and economy of the United States. A valid argument against the...
tracking img