Springbok tour essay.
The 1981 springbok tour protests had a huge social and political impact on New Zealand society. The decision to allow the springbok tour to proceed was one of the most controversial decisions ever taken by New Zealand government. New Zealand rugby relationships with South Africa began in 1921. In the 1921 tour when a Maori player was included in the New Zealand team, South Africa opposed to this. Continuing tours between South Africa and New Zealand excluded any Maori players from playing. In the 1960 tour when no Maori no tour were allowed to play against south Africa the Maori MP emuera triakakena order the tour should be cancelled. A petition with 156, 000 signatures on it were presented to parliament demanding the tour to be stopped if Maoris were excluded from playing. Most of these signatures were from white new Zealanders. In the 1920 tour South Africa permitted Maori and islanders to participate in the tour with the term honorary whites on their passport. Because of this action thirty countries boycott the 1926 Montreal Olympic Games and refused to compete with New Zealand. In 1978 the New Zealand government agreed to sign the glen eagle’s agreement, which stated that New Zealand had to discourage contact and competition between sporting organisations from South Africa. The apartheid system in South Africa at the time of the springbok tour had laws that separated all blacks and whites in South Africa. Blacks and whites had to go to different places as whites for example they had separate toilets, separate benches, separate stairways, they lived in different areas and blacks and whites could not marry. It was politically important for the national government to allow the tour to go ahead. The national party would benefit from letting the 1981 tour go ahead because most of their supporters were rural rugby fans. Robert Muldoon believed that cancelling the tour would be an infringement on new Zealanders rights. Muldoon thought that...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document