Preview

Logic

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1557 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Logic
Spinoza’s Argument for Substance Monism and Common Objections Spinoza’s Ethics is widely thought of as Spinoza’s greatest work. One noteworthy claim that he makes in his Ethics is his argument for substance monism, or the existence of only one substance. In Proposition 14, Part I of his Ethics, Spinoza states that “There can be, or be conceived, no other substance but God.” This statement amounts to saying that everything else in this world, whether it is extended or not, is a mere image of God. Spinoza’s proof for this comes in three steps. One, assume that no two substances can share an attribute. Two, assume that there exists a substance that contains infinite attributes. Three, by these two assumptions, another substance cannot exist because it would have to share an attribute with God. Although there are objections claiming these assumptions and, consequently, the proposition are wrong, these objections are based on misinterpretations of Spinoza’s definitions, and I believe Spinoza is correct in arguing for substance monism. In order to prove my point, I will first define some terms and give some axioms that Spinoza uses. Then I will prove the two assumptions he uses in his proof, and argue for substance monism. Afterwards, I will proceed to give the most common objection to Spinoza’s proof, followed by a refutation of this objection. In the beginning of his Ethics, Spinoza gives the definitions and axioms that all of his propositions are based on. Spinoza defines a substance to be that which is in itself and is conceived through itself. A mode is defined as the affections of substance (we will use the term affections in place of modes.) An attribute is that which the intellect perceives of substance as constituting its essence. For example, if we assume a tree to be a substance, an attribute is what we perceive to be the essences of the tree, and pine, maple and willow would be some of the many modes of trees. In reality we would not consider a tree to be


References: Ariew, Roger, and Eric Watkins. "Baruch Spinoza, The Ethics (1677)." Readings in Modern Philosophy: Volume I. N.p.: Hackett, n.d. 158-165. Brown, Curtis. Classical Modern Philosophy. Course home page. Dept. of Philosophy, Trinity University, San Antonio. 23 Apr. 2008 <http://www.trinity.edu/cbrown/modern/spinozaPartI.html>. Nadler, Steven, "Baruch Spinoza", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2006 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2006/entries/spinoza/>.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The aim of this paper is to reduce Swinburne’s Christian centered theodicy into a pantheistic theodicy via modification of Spinoza’s necessitarianism. To begin, I will accept the imperative conditions of Swinburne’s theodicy up to a certain degree. Consequently, the primary condition Swinburne’s theodicy and my proposal each share is the consequentialist disposition of the Divine. However, the noted degree at which these theodicies will deviate is the condition demanding objective moral judgments. In particular, the deviation occurs where Swinburne asserts “the problem of evil does not arise if one denies either the omnipotence or the perfect goodness of God”. And so that is where the central divide between the two views comes into play. The…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "Desiderius Erasmus (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)." Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Web. 16 Aug. 2010. .…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    3. Kant, Immanuel. 1780. "Preface". In The Metaphysical Elements of Ethics.Translated by Thomas Kingsmill Abbot…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Andy Goldsworthy - Paper

    • 1767 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Andy Goldsworthy - Philosophy. (n.d.). University of Cincinnati, UC Blue Ash. Retrieved May 1, 2012, from http://www.ucblueash.edu/artcomm/web/w2005_2006/maria_Goldsworthy/philosophy.html…

    • 1767 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sexist vs Misanthrope

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages

    References: Kant, Immanuel; translated by James W. Ellington [1785] (1993). Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals 3rd ed. Hackett.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Nietzsche, F. The Genealogy of Morals, 1887. (In: 'Basic Writings of Nietzsche ', translated by Walter Kaufmann, New York, 2000)…

    • 2437 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hicks, Stephen R.C. "Rand, Ayn Alissa [Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy]." Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 28 Jan. 2002. Rockford College. 2 Dec. 2011 .…

    • 1365 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Kant vs Aristotle

    • 1314 Words
    • 6 Pages

    During the 17th and 18th century two philosophers, Plato and Aristotle, arose carving for themselves a trench in the philosophical world. We can see the biggest distinction between the two in their theories of how we know things exist. The traditions of Plato and Aristotle have been dubbed rationalism and empiricism respectively. Under these traditions many well known philosophers have formed their own theories of God, existence and the material world. Through these individual theories I will show how each fits into the category of either Rationalist or Imperialist. The Plutonian philosophers to be discussed will include Descartes, Spinoza, and Leibniz. And the Aristotelian philosophers will include Locke, Berkeley and Hume.…

    • 1314 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In this essay it will be argued that the soul is mortal and does not survive the death of the body. As support, the following arguments from Lucretius will be examined: the “proof from the atomic structure of the soul,” the “proof from parallelism of mind and body,” the “proof from the sympatheia of mind and body,” and the “proof from the structural connection between mind and body.” The following arguments from Plato will be used as counterarguments against Lucretius: the “cyclical argument,” the “affinity argument,” the “argument from the form of life,” and the “recollection argument.” It will be shown that Plato’s premises lack validity and that Lucretius’ position is the more reasonable of the two.…

    • 1663 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hw 1-Logic

    • 1479 Words
    • 6 Pages

    ix. Because the conclusion is supported by a chain of reasoning involving a premise that restates or presupposes the conclusion, __________________.) (If the conclusion is merely presupposed and not restated, write which explicit premise presupposes it: __________________.)…

    • 1479 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Kant, Immanuel, and H. J. Paton. Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals. New York: Harper & Row, 1964. Print.…

    • 1830 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Substance dualism is often called ‘Cartesian dualism" ‎and is the assumption that mind and body are really distinct substances. Rene Descartes (1596 – 1650) was the first early modern philosopher to hold that a thinking-thing is entirely different form an extended thing and mind can exist without the body. Cartesian dualism, which started the famous mind-body problem of causal interaction, has been criticised by many, one of whom was a primary adherent, Baruch Spinoza (632-1677). This essay aims to explain and assess Spinoza’s criticism of Descartes substance dualism and see what Spinoza offers instead. I will begin by summarizing the views of Descartes on substance and distinctiveness of mind and body and how they interact. Then I will discuss Spinoza’s objections to Descartes views in general but give more details about the ones I believe are more important. I will finish by concluding what Spinoza actually wants out of it and what he really achieves.…

    • 2179 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Allegory of the Cave

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the parable, Plato describes a group of prisoners chained in a dark cave. One of the prisoners is released and was forced to climb upward out of the cave into the distant light. Plato then concludes that the prison is the world we see in our eyes; the fire is the sun; and the climb upward is the journey of the mind towards knowledge (Philosophy: Q&T, p.9).…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Socrates as Eros

    • 1805 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Truly, love takes on many different forms. Love, for many centuries, has been given many different names. It also serves different functions. To distinguish a specific type of love, one of them is called eros. How love as eros can be defined is based upon the utilization of a specific writer’s perspective. Numerous published written works may account for the definition of eros. In this Essay, Plato’s perception of love as eros will be described. Furthermore, how and why Socrates, of “The Apology” by Plato, embodies Plato’s definition of eros will be shown. This embodiment will be based off Plato’s eros as poor being, eros as an intermediary between God and men, and eros as resemblance of the “god of Plenty”, eros’ father (Needleman 15 – 17).…

    • 1805 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Plato's Timaeus

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages

    * Popkin, Richard H. Columbia History of Western Philosophy, The. NY: Columbia UP, 2005. (ISBN 0231101295) (B72.C593 1999), pp.32-52…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays