Preview

Soft Power Without Hard Power Is No Power.

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1117 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Soft Power Without Hard Power Is No Power.
Soft power without hard power is no power.

In the early 1990s, Joseph Nye’s book Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature Of American Power ignited a huge discussion among society of the need to transition from America’s traditional use of hard power to something more benign which he termed soft power. Before looking at the two branches of power, we first define power as the ability to do something or act in a certain way. As Nye had pointed out, nations can wield power in two forms, soft and hard power. Soft power, as coined by Nye (1990) is defined as “the ability to get what you want through attraction rather than through coercion.” In contrast, hard power is seen as the use of military might or economic sanctions to coerce others into doing your will.

Even as soft power gains traction among world leaders today, many still find the concept vague and hard to wield. While soft power may be beneficial in certain context, it does not work independently of hard power and requires the underlying use of hard power to back it up. This paper looks at the nature of soft power and its relationship with hard power.

As Nye stated (2004a), soft power is based on the concept of attraction. In other words, it’s the power of attraction. However, this concept is based on the premise that attraction equates the ability to influence (Fan 2007). Often, this is not the case. While a country may be positively perceived in the eyes others, this rarely translates into the ability to influence. According to Monocle magazine’s annual Soft Power survey in 2012, the UK overtook US as the nation with the ‘softest’ power. Looking at UK now, we see a declining superpower whose shine as long faded off. Its presence on the world stage has often been limited. Given its top ranking, this has not translated into a proportionate global influence. This can be contrasted with US whose reputation have taken a beating but yet hold much sway in the world. A country like Norway may be respected for



References: Bially Mattern, Janice. 2005. "Why 'Soft Power ' Isn 't So Soft: Representational Force and the Sociolinguistic Construction of Attraction in World Politics." Millennium, vol. 33, no. 3 (June), pp. 583-612 Fan, Y. (2007) ‘Soft power: Power of attraction or confusion?’, Place Branding and Public Diplomacy Vol. 4, 2, 147–158, Palgrave Macmillan Ltd Nye, J. S. (1990) ‘Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power’, Basic Books, New York, NY. Nye, J. S. (2004a) ‘Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics’, Public Affairs, New York, NY, pp. 7–8. Nye, J. S. (2004b) ‘The benefit of soft power’, HBS Working Knowledge, available at http://hbswk.hbs.edu/archive/4290. html.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The book begins in the United States – the present-day world hyper-power. The United States’ ascent to world dominance began after its victory in World War II, which was catalyzed in large part through what the country offered – freedom, as well as a chance to start anew. Offerings such as freedom sparked an influx of immigrants, and immigrants attracted into the United States in turn built up human population and made the job market more competitive. However, as America’s power grew stronger, the country became increasingly an “empire.” Exercising its powers, America began over-using military force, threatening foreign governments, and taking global actions without international approval. These intrusive behaviors of America, however, go against history. Lessons learned from the past suggest that world super-powers could only dominate through compliance with foreign nations, such as how Achaemenid Empire ruled their people.…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Realism is a school of International Relations thought that postulates that states are engaged in a struggle for supremacy against other states in a system that has no external oversight. Accordingly, states seek to acquire power to secure themselves from aggressors and to enable them to pursue their own interests in a competitive world where all states seek only self aggrandizement. This paper aims to delve into these core pillars of the Realist paradigm and ask why do states seek power and can they ever have enough? To do so will require a study of power itself – what is it and how is it acquired? The relationship between states, power and politics is as contested and controversial as any debate in international relations discourse; this short treatise aims to offer an overview and an insight drawn from the study of the author. It hopes to provide a succinct insight into power as a core determinant of the evolution of global political realities.…

    • 2629 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hook, Steven W. 2008. U.S. Foreign Policy: The Paradox of World Power. 2nd ed. Washington DC: CQ Press.…

    • 2996 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Policymaking and the Media

    • 8143 Words
    • 33 Pages

    Bachrach, P. & M. S. Baratz (1962). Two faces of power. American Political Science Review, 56, 947-952.…

    • 8143 Words
    • 33 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arrogance of Power Review

    • 734 Words
    • 2 Pages

    William J. Fulbright, a democratic Senator from Arkansas, was Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in 1966 when The Arrogance of Power was published. In an excerpt from Fulbright’s book, he analyzes the misguided thinking behind America's global interventionism and its delusion of righteous all-powerfulness. These symptoms are a confusion of power and virtue. Fulbright defines the arrogance of power as, “a psychological need that nations seem to have in order to prove that they are bigger, better, or stronger than other nations” (2). William J. Fulbright uses persuasive appeals in his well structured book, The Arrogance of Power to help convey his views on U.S. war strategies.…

    • 734 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A key tenet of realist thinking is the concept of power, or more specifically, ‘hard power’ and its uses within the realm of international relations. It is the ability to make other actors comply with a state’s will through the use of force and threat (Copeland 2010). With this key tenet, comes the realist notion of an ongoing balancing of power between states. Some have gone so far as to call it “the central theoretical concept of international relations” (Snyder 1984). This realist sentiment can easily…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The day the power of love overrules the love of power, the world will know peace.”- Mahatma Gandhi. This quote reveals that the world is run by the love of power and that is what is keeping our world from reaching its full potential. Power has the potential to affect others in a positive way. As it produces guidance organization for those who don’t really know what they are doing.…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The article, “Hard Power, Soft Power, Smart Power” is an exposé by author Ernest T. Wilson III regarding the current state of American foreign policy. He argues that neither soft nor hard power are sufficient enough in this day in age. Soft powers tends to be politically naïve and institutionally fragile while hard power frames arguments insufficiently and overlooks elements of national power. Instead, he lobbies for a form of public policy that combines fundamentals of hard and soft power that mutually emphasizes the actor’s principle in smart power.…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Power has the ability to control a persons behavior and actions with the use of coercion, payment, and attraction. Theorist such as Joseph Nye and John Mearsheimer retain individual views of power. Where as Nye has a liberalist view by what is know as Soft Power, where manipulation is used with the absence of violence. Compared to Mearsheimer's realist view where Hard Power is the presence of violence and force. With the combination of both powers, balance is shown between the perspectives of Nye and Mearsheimer. This is called Smart Power. Hard power is more effective that soft power, hit the use of smart power dominates them both.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To begin with, hard power such as military and economic powers has lost their strength after the end of the Cold War. A new and different concept, called the soft power is now rising. Soft power can be defined as attractiveness, the ability to attract and…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Abuse Of Power In America

    • 1480 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In todays world the concept of "power is essentially contested, because there are different definitions of what power 'is' and therefore how it appears or is exercised."(Axford and Browning et al., 2002). Power is spoken about and depended on in todays society, but nobody truly understands it. (Nye, 2004). Power is exercised completely different throughout the world, as each country has its own laws, morals, attitudes, beliefs, government and military interference. As a world wide definition 'Power' can be defined as a possession of control, authority or influence over others. We see this definition of power exercised all over the world on the television or in a newspaper, as the domination of one group of people over another can have detrimental affects for a country, which is then penetrated throughout the world by the power of the media. (Anon, 2008). This essay will explore the different types of power throughout the world, and how each state incorporates power in either a positive or negative way in the running of their country. It will examine the type of power in America, which will be contrasted with the type of power…

    • 1480 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The views expressed by these authors are focused politically to power, which make people reflect on what power means; this involves attraction and subjugates provocation. The power is so great that it will always be seen negatively. With power one can organize groups but,…

    • 1570 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some critics (Palmar, 2010; Lagon, 2011) dislike Barak Obama’s policy decisions. They argue that Obama mostly was using hard power politics. Their arguments include: 1) increased amount of US troops in Afghanistan by 35000 soldiers, 2) unmanned drones used against terrorists, 3) failure to close Guantánamo, and 4) killing Osama bin Laden. For this reason, critics point out that even if Obama speaks in the language of soft power, his actions are of hard power (Hallams, 2011). As a counterargument to this statement, it is worth analyzing President’s speech at Oslo in 2009, where Obama mentioned that soft power and diplomacy are crucially important but not everything may be solved or achieved through them. So here are the limits of soft power.…

    • 233 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Joseph Nye Soft Power

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the 18th Century, Thomas Jefferson stated, “the less we use our power, the greater it will be” and this concept was echoed over 200 years later by Joseph Nye in his 2004 book, “Soft power”. This essay will delve into the effectiveness of Nye’s concept of “soft power” in 21st century international relations, highlighting the cases of its use in the process.…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1. What are American foreign policy terms? Give an example of one use of hard power and one use of soft power in promoting each goal?…

    • 2014 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays