Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Sociological Theories Applied to the Film V for Vendetta

Good Essays
932 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Sociological Theories Applied to the Film V for Vendetta
Theorists are individuals who attempt to describe social phenomenon. What is interesting is that these theories have been around for many years and they can be applied to our current social era. I will apply theories introduced by theorist like George Herbert Mead, Karl Marx, and Emile Durkheim to a film that was released in 2006 titled V for Vendetta.
Legal Authority, according to Max Weber rests on the belief that the legality of enacted rules and the right of those in authority to issue such rules and commands (Appelrouth & Edles, 179). The film begins with a loud announcement over speakers that a 9:00 pm curfew is in effect for everyone in London. These orders are enforced, by “Fingermen” of the Chancellor. “Fingermen” are police like individuals who ensure that the curfew imposed is respected. Other rules are also imposed in the film are homosexuality, it is not allowed because it is deemed morally wrong by the Chancellor. The use or practice of other religions is also against the rules.
Altruistic Suicide, according to Emile Durkheim is having a strong relationship to your group and ultimately, “the individual gives his life for the social group” (Appelrouth & Edles, 112). This can be observed in the film when the character “V” makes a deal with Creedy, Creedy is V’s only way to get close to Sutler. V has planned to kill Sutler and plans to do so in exchange for his surrender to Creedy. V knows that this is a dangerous plan since Creedy will certainly kill him, but V is only concerned with advancing the purpose of the 5th of November. V is willing to give up his own being for what he believes in and the good of others. According to Emile Durkheim, The “coercive power” of social facts raised in The Rules of Sociological Method: crime is a nessecity because, “a society exempt from crime is utterly impossible, it is impossible to all be alike (Appelrouth & Edles, 94).” Durkheim argues that crime is inevitable or “normal” in all societies because crime defines the moral boundaries of a society, and in doing so communicates to its inhabitants the range of acceptable behaviors. The character V can be seen committing crime throughout the entire film, although V is not committing crime for the sake of breaking the law. V sees his actions as a step forward to rebuilding a new society, a society where individuals will no longer fear their own government, a society where ideas matter. It is crime and punishment that helps clarify and reaffirm the rules of the game and that is the basis of society itself. Perhaps the most notable crime committed by V is the destruction of Parliament. Organic Solidarity refers to a type of solidarity in which each person is interdependent with others, “forming a complex web of cooperative associations” (Appelrouth & Edles, 104). A feeling of “oneness” emerges when individuals believe in the same thing and come together knowing that each is doing their part for the good of the whole. In V for Vendetta, the clock striking midnight on the fifth of November is significant to the entire city of London because they place their differences and fear aside to come together. This can be observed in the film, when men, women, and children of all different socio economic backgrounds, ethnic backgrounds and social orientation all come together dressed in V’s attire to stand against a Totalitarian London. George Herbert Mead teaches us that the “me” is the response of the individual to the attitudes of others (Appelrouth & Edles, 329). In V for Vendetta, the main character no longer has a self identity. We can see this as he is only referred to by the letter or Roman numeral “V.” V also wears a mask throughout the entire film, he does not introduce himself as a man, but as a man in a mask. This is how people perceive him and he accepts that this is who he is. With Meads “I” can be viewed as V goes around London trying to pursue his goal of reliving the fifth of November. Karl Marx sums up communist as the abolition of private property (Appelrouth & Edles, 79). Capitol is not personal, but it is a social power. The entire film is dedicated to the abolition of parliament by way of the use of capitalism. When V takes over the news feed and addresses all of London, he is calling them to action! He wants to reinvent how society is operated and allow everyone to be a part of the decision making process. Anti social behavior is having an understanding of rules and values and going against them. In V for Vendetta, Gordon Deitrich has a secret room in his home where he keeps all things banned by the Chancellor. We are able to see that he has a Koran and he confesses to Evey that he is also a homosexual. V’s behavior throughout the entire movie can be attributed to anti social behavior, he clearly understands the Chancellor is ruler of all London, yet his entire plan is to remove his power. The film V for Vendetta carries many social aspects that have been described by theorist many centuries ago. It is interesting to see how the past really reinvents and helps shape our future. It is through social interaction and social phenomenon that sociology thrives.

Reference Page
Appelrouth, Scott and Desfor Edles, Laura. 2008, Classical and Contemporary Sociological Theory. Northridge, CA: Pine Forge Press.
McTeigue, James. 2006. V for Vendetta. Warner Brothers.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Durkheim looks at how crime and deviance is inevitable and needed in society as it performs two important positive functions: boundary maintenance and adaptation and change, he says that boundary maintenance is when society reacts to crime and there is social cohesion, and this leads to society condemning the criminal and the punishment given by the social agencies is a way of reaffirming societies shared rules and reinforce social solidarity. The media portrays the court case and the punishment; this acts a way of informing members of society and discourages others from rule breaking. Adaptation and change for Durkheim is when an individual has an idea or belief which is seen to be deviant by rest of the members of society, they fight and challenge the existing norms and values, in time there values may give way to a new culture and morality and not seen as deviant anymore such as cohabiting couples would be seen as deviant due to the couples not been married but in current times it is not deviant as it is more popular in society. These changes in values and in society allow society to progress and evolve. Furthermore Durkheim acknowledges that crime and deviance are inevitable because not everyone is socialized in the same way with the same norms and values. Functionalism is useful as it…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Conley in his chapter over Social Control and Deviance make a sociologic approach to criminology and society. He also demonstrates approaches to the subject from various points of views of different sociologists such as Emilee Durkheim, Foucault, and Robert Merton. To Conley, the transgressions of the society norms such as crimes can vary from a culture to another culture, context, or with the divisions of labor as people get more professionally specialized. This labor division introduces a concept made by Emilee Durkheim, in which the society was divide in two system called Organic Solidary and Mechanical Solidarity.…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Durkheim argued that a certain amount of crime was ‘healthy’ for society and that it is deviant behaviour that provided a catalyst for social change. He said that crime and deviance are functional because the ritual of punishment is an expressive experience that serves to bind together members of a social group and establishment a sense of community; also known as re-affirming boundaries as the resulting media coverage publicly reaffirms the existing values. They are useful in introducing necessary changes and preparing people for change – as Durkheim argues all social change begins with some form of deviance; certain crimes when prosecuted illicit public sympathy and affect change in legislation policies – Kiranjit Ahluwalia, Rosa Parks. Durkheim also put forward social cohesion, this is when certain horrific crimes are committed the entire community are drawn together in shared outrage, such as September 11th Twin Towers, often resulting in public accepting legislative changes which severely impact upon out civil liberties. However Durkheim also seen negatives aspects of Crime and Deviance named ‘Anomie’ the point when crimes becomes dysfunctional. This is a condition characterized by the breakdown of norms governing social interaction. Durkheim argues that people can only be happy when their wants are commensurate to their means. He thought that humans are basically selfish in nature and if left to their own devices would in order to satisfy their own needs, commit crime if they could get away with it. A state of anomie would therefore occur where there are insufficient social controls to ensure conformity from individuals. He argued that this would normally occur in periods of great social change or stress, where the collective conscience may be weakened.…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Individuals lead to crime for slightly different reasons which relate to their unique genetic character, their corresponding mental ability, their socialization and life circumstances; it is the interplay of these and other variables, any one of which may be more determinative in a particular case that causes a particular individual to resort to crime. Consequently, crime, like poverty, doesn't lend itself very well to comprehensive solutions, unless these solutions simultaneously address all the dominant factors underlying its causation in the majority of cases. The “Urban Society-Gesellshaft Thesis” goes on to say that important normative constraint which served to deter criminal behavior in the past tend to be absent in modern urban societies. The dramatic increase in crime in the 19th and 20th centuries has been attributed to the absence of a sense of community in urban societies.…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Durkheim believes that crime is normal, and argues there are at least two reasons why crime and deviance are found in all societies: not everyone is equally effectively socialised into the shared norms and values, so some individuals will be prone to deviate, and particularly in modern societies, there is a diversity of lifestyles and values Different groups develop their own subcultures with distinctive norms and values, and what the members of the subculture regard as normal, mainstream culture may seem as deviant.…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The sociological theory on the other hand sees the social environment as the case of criminal…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sociological theory identifies different social factors that connects individuals to crime. According to Kaska and Neuman (2008), there are 4 parts of social theory starting with assumptions, concepts, relationships, and ending with units of analysis (p. 102). There are numerous reasons why crime exists in society. Not every individual who commits a crime has the same reasoning behind why he or she does so. Theorists research different aspects on each crime and the reasoning behind them. Social theory covers different social reasons behind crime, such as economic factors, social statuses, available education in different neighborhoods, and even availability of extracurricular activities. Williams III and McShane (2010) state, “without a social theory of community, crime theories risk reducing their focus to individuals without recognizing larger forces at work” (p. 58).…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    This essay will offer different definitions of crime, suggesting that it is a social construction as it varies across culture, time and belief. It will examine the role of social construction, through interpretation and meaning, in the identification, reporting and legal consequences of criminal acts. After illustrating how fear, escalated by the media, can directly affect crime, it will conclude that crime and its consequences are socially constructed.…

    • 765 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In today’s society crime does more than expose the weakness in social relationships it undermines the social order itself by destroying assumptions on which it is based (Schnalleger, Chapter 1 what is criminal justice, 2011). Society has many different definitions of crime. The text states that crime is conduct in violation of the criminal laws of a state, the federal government or, local jurisdiction, for which there is no legally acceptable justification or excuse (Schnalleger, Chapter what is criminal justice, 2011). There are many models of how society determines which act are criminal, but the two most common are consensus…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Essay

    • 5411 Words
    • 22 Pages

    Williams, F. P., III, & McShane, M. D. (1988). Criminological Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Wilson, J. Q., & Hernstein, R. (1985). Crime and Human Nature:…

    • 5411 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Criminal Justice

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Theory Classical Main Points Theorists/Researchers Beccaria Crime occurs when the benefits outweigh the costs—when people pursue self-interest in the absence of effective punishments. Crime is a freewilled choice. See also deterrence, rational choice. Cric if reinforced. When criminal subcultures exist, then many individuals can learn to commit crime in one location and crime rates—including violence— may become very high. The gap between the American Dream’s goal of economic success and the opportunity to obtain this goal creates structural strain. Norms weaken and ‘anomie’ ensues, thus creating high crime rates. When otheant. When such an institutional imbalance exists—as in the United States—then crime rates are very high. Glueck & Glueck Mednick Caspi Moffitt Shaw & McKay Sampson Bursik & Grasmick…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Criminological Theory

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A theory is a useful tool that helps people understands the world around them. For example, in criminology, a theory helps the public understand the functioning of the criminal justice system, the occurrence of crimes and the methods or approaches people implement when committing crimes. In many instances, theory suggests the way things are, not the way they should be. For example, a theory is not naturally good or bad; however, people often use theories for good or bad purposes (William & McShane, 2010).…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Theory is an attempt to explain the unexplained, to give title to the untitled and to give reason to the unreasonable. It is a combination of existing knowledge and newly acquired knowledge that allows us to make assumptions in order to realise reasonably foreseeable outcomes.…

    • 1151 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    History has a tendency to repeat itself. One of humanity’s most popular ways of getting its point across is through violence. When words are no longer enough to argue a point, human casualties not only directly solve the problem, but symbolically send a message to all those affected as well. Just as the American colonies fought against the British for Freedom when their voice was no longer heard, and just as the Islamic extremists used terrorism to send an evil message to America, both V and Chancellor Sutler used violence to gain a voice in a world of chaos.…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    van Duyne, Petrus, The phantom and threat of organized crime, Crime, Law and Social Change, 24(4), 1996, 341-377.…

    • 4747 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics