Preview

Sir Douglas Haig: The Battle Of The Somme

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
259 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Sir Douglas Haig: The Battle Of The Somme
The Battle of the Somme was one of the largest battles of the first world war, which was fought between July 1st and November 1st in 1918. It was named so as the battle was fought near the Somme river in France. On the first day alone, our side suffered more than 57 thousand casualties and by the last day of the battle we had lost more than 1.5 million men. Sir Douglas Haig was British commander on the Western Front during the majority of the first world war. The high casualties of the battle were caused mostly due to his military strategies. This made him a controversial figure in the eyes of many.

Haig has been considered to be the Butcher of the Somme, as he used tactics which sent thousands of men into a battle that would result in their
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Why Did Haig Deserve To Be Called The Butcher Of The Somme
    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why Did Haig Deserve To Be Called The Butcher Of The Somme

    At Verdun the German army had launched an all out attack against the French army, for the Germans there plan was for a battle of attrition and so they wanted to pull in the French army to Verdun and then kill as many of them as possible but not to take Verdun. ‘The necessity of relieving pressure on the French army’ is said to be the main objective of the battle of the Somme said in Ben Walsh’s book. The German plan was going well and pressure needed to be taken off the French and so some think Haig had to send thousands to their death to cause a distraction and relieve pressure off the French army and so what he did was save more lives than he…

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Interpretation that Haig was/wasn't a Butcher (Source analysis)
    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Interpretation that Haig was/wasn't a Butcher (Source analysis)

    Source B4 was written by David Lloyd George, who was at the time Prime Minister of Britain during WW1. He describes Haig as a “second rate commander” because of the high death count at the Somme, he later describes Haig as being incapable of “planning vast campaigns on the scale demanded on so immense a battlefield”. The source is reliable because of the fact that it was written by the…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Some People Have the View That British Generals Like Haig Were Incompetent Leaders. How Far Does the Sources Support or Contradict This Interpretation?
    • 2361 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Some People Have the View That British Generals Like Haig Were Incompetent Leaders. How Far Does the Sources Support or Contradict This Interpretation?

    A direct witness Fred Pearson, who was a private on the Western Front , holds a letter to a local newspaper during 1966 (Source B3). He says in the letter “The biggest murderer of the lot was Haig” this quote supports the view of British generals being incompetent. Debates still rage about Haigs tactics at the Battle of the Somme, when 20,000 men were killed on the first day alone. He also talks about his wrong decisions where he…

    • 2361 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Is It Fair to Criticise General Haig as a Donkey Who Led Lions
    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Is It Fair to Criticise General Haig as a Donkey Who Led Lions

    There is sufficient evidence to indicate that that Douglas Haig was a poor General, or a donkey. The evidence is that General Haig, along with many other Generals, were used to handling small-scale forces in colonial warfare. They had a lot to learn about this type of warfare, for which they were very unprepared. Furthermore, communications were poor, and armies were too big and dispersed to be commanded by a General himself. Haig should have, however, made sure that all his soldiers knew what the plan was before they set off, and Haig should have planned how he was going to communicate with them. Moreover, if the infantry and artillery did manage to hit the enemy Haig lacked a fast moving force to use the situation effectively. Additionally, General Haig’s 1914 tactics had yet to catch up with the range and effectiveness of modern artillery and the latest machine guns. Likewise, Haig learnt the wrong lesson from previous attacks, instead of persisting with short times of extreme amounts of fire. Haig used heavier guns and longer bombardments that just churned up the ground and eliminated the element of surprise. Haig was not able to accept information passed on to him, a great example of this was when it was suggested that much of the barbed wire on the Somme was not cut, he admitted that himself, but he still…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Keegan: Face of Battle Review
    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Keegan: Face of Battle Review

    As we have discussed and examined over the past two weeks of our seminar, John Keegan’s The Face of Battle explores warfare from the viewpoint of the common soldier by analyzing and comparing the three well-known battles of Agincourt, Waterloo and Somme. Keegan's three examinations of Agincourt, Waterloo and the Somme begin by analyzing the traditional outlines of events. Keegan then moves through the main phase of each battle, attempting to make sense of the major events, providing the frame and context necessary in order to begin considering the combatants: how the soldiers felt before the battle, what actually happened when the troops engaged, focusing-in on what these nuanced psycho-sociological details provide. Towards this monumental effort, while limiting much of his coverage largely to the first day of the offensive, Keegan was particularly focused revealing the brutality of the first day of Somme: “In all, the British had lost about 60,000, of whom 21,000 had been killed, most in the first hour of the attack, perhaps the first minutes" (Keegan, 1983). The conditions of the battle were so abhorrent, Keegan describes, with “long docile lines of young men, shoddily uniformed, heavily burdened, numbered about their necks, plodding forward across a featureless landscape to their own extermination" (1983).…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Battle of the Somme and Source
    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Battle of the Somme and Source

    Source 1 is an extract from Sir Douglas Haig’s final dispatch, published in March 1919. This source begins to describe the Battle of the Somme as a tremendous victory. Haig claims that “The three main objectives… had been achieved.” Haig also then begins to describe the three objectives, “Verdun had been relieved…”, “German forces had been held down…” and “the enemy’s strength had been considerably worn down”. Haig also claims that as the objectives had been “achieved” this was enough to “…justify the Somme Battle.” This source was published shortly after the war in 1919, but was a few years after the Battle of the Somme allowing some time for the truth about the events of the battle to emerge. The source has some limitations as it was an extract from Haig’s own writing, who was Commander-in-Chief of the British Forces therefore the source may be bias towards Britain and their success in the battle. The purpose of the source was to inform people of Haig’s perception of the battle and due to this being one person’s view, the accuracy of the source cannot be verified.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Does Field Marshal Haig Desreve the Title of "The Butcher of the Somme"?
    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Does Field Marshal Haig Desreve the Title of "The Butcher of the Somme"?

    Field Marshal Douglas Haig was a British senior officer in World War One and commanded in the Battle of the Somme, which was arguably one of the bloodiest battles in British military history. Haig gained the title of the butcher of the Somme after the end of World War One, due to the indescribable amount of casualties and deaths that took place. One could say that Haig deserves the title because of the huge loss of life, his bad planning and repetition of bad tactics and the fact that he was completely out of touch with his soldiers. Some say he doesn’t because he was arguably the best the British had, no one knew how to fight in trench warfare and he pushed what was arguably the world's most powerful army off of French soil.…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Haig was the Butcher of the Somee
    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Haig was the Butcher of the Somee

    He is remembered mainly for the death of thousands of men during the Battle of the Somme. On the first day alone 60,000 British soldiers lost their lives. The reason that so many soldiers died was because Haig ordered his men to walk across no man’s land. They were very easy targets for the German machine guns. However these men died for a reason, they were protecting their families and everyone else on the Home Front. They also died to prevent Britain becoming a German nation.…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Haig Butcher of the Somme
    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Haig Butcher of the Somme

    General Sir Douglas Haig, British Commander-in-Chief on the western front, was not really ready to attack in mid-1916. He wanted to wait until later in the year and attack in Flanders (not the Somme). However, his hand was forced. In February 1916, the Germans attacked the French fortress of Verdun. The attack intensified for the next four months until there was a danger that Verdun would fall and the Germans would break through the French lines. The British and French governments decided that Haig would have to attack at the Somme in July. This would be the first major battle of the war for the British Army.…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Was General Haig the Butcher of the Somme?
    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Was General Haig the Butcher of the Somme?

    General Haig's title of 'butcher of the Somme' originated after the First World War, when, due to a large number of casualties Britain suffered from the war and mostly the Somme. The people of Britain wanted someone to blame. This was a coping mechanism in which people could deal with the loss of the 'lost generation'. Feild Marshall Haig has often been called the butcher of the Somme because 20000 soldiers died on the first day of the battle, and a further 40000 were injured. The battle of the Somme was one of the 6 blodiest battles of world war one, and resulted in more British dead than any battle before it. One canadian Battalion lost 700 out of 850 men in the battle of the Somme. Stories started to reach home of the heavy casulty losses and the awful conditions n the trenches.However, some historians disagree and argue that Haig was not responsible for the human losses, because his military methods were in line with the ideas of the time (source 2, a book called Feild Marshall Haig written by Philip Warner an Historian). Death is a fact of war. Haig wrote 'The nation must be thought to bear losses. No amount of skill on the part of the commanders, no training however good, no superiority of arms and ammunition will enable victories to be won without the sacrifice of men's lives. The nation must be prepared to see heavy casualty lists.…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    To What Extent Do You Agree with the View That Douglas Haig Deserves His Reputation as the ‘Butcher of the Somme’?
    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages

    To What Extent Do You Agree with the View That Douglas Haig Deserves His Reputation as the ‘Butcher of the Somme’?

    The Battle of Somme started in July 1st 1916. It was planned as a joint French and British operation. The idea originally came from the French Commander-in-Chief called Joseph Joffre and Haig accepted it. The battle was launched on the 1st July 1916. The French achieved there objective but whilst doing this there were 7000 casualties however the British weren’t successful and on the first day they had 60 000 casualties, including 20 000 dead however in the final result the British did win. The main plan of action was to kill all the German soldiers and destroy the German trenches.…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Lions Led by Donkeys Essay Example
    • 1645 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Lions Led by Donkeys Essay Example

    Douglas Haig was Britain’s commander-in-chief during the battle of the Somme and took much criticism for the utter loss of life in this battle. Haig put his belief in one final mighty push against the Germans to be executed in the Somme region of France. Haig did not rate very highly the war's new weaponry. "The machine gun is a much over rated weapon," he said in 1915; he made similar remarks over the use of the tank. The tank was a British invention which had made its debut on the Somme…

    • 1645 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Haig Is Bad Leader
    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Why Haig Is Bad Leader

    The battle of the Somme occurred on the 1th of July 1916, with the English and French army fighting against the German. English’s army’s leader, Haig, was considered to be a donkey, meaning to be a bad general. The historian John Laffin claims that Haig was an awful leader; he says that “Haig really thought he was doing what the people wanted him to do” which makes us think that he was being a good general. These facts may not be true as it was take nearly a 100 years after the war so the facts can be muddled up and he wasn’t there to witness it, he’s just saying from his point of view, but because Haig was deluded that he was doing the right thing and that it would work made him think he would win the war, but it didn’t happen. For this reason, Haig was a donkey.…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Is The Battle Of The Somme Important
    • 5022 Words
    • 21 Pages

    Why Is The Battle Of The Somme Important

    Also known as the Somme Offensive, took place during the First World War between 1 July and 14 November 1916 in the Somme department of France, on both banks of the river of the same name. The battle consisted of an offensive by the British and French armies against the German Army, which, since invading France in August 1914, had occupied large areas of that country. The Battle of the Somme was one of the largest battles of the First World War; by the time fighting had petered out in late autumn 1916 the forces involved had suffered more than 1 million casualties, making it one of the bloodiest military operations…

    • 5022 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Douglas Haig, good and bad points
    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Douglas Haig, good and bad points

    Douglas Haig has been blamed for the slaughter of thousands of men who were under his control in World War One. The Battle of the Somme was one of his worst fights were 60,000 British soldiers died in the first day alone. After the Battle of the Somme, Haig got the nickname "Butcher of the Somme“. He was given this nickname because some people felt that Haig had not cared how much ground was gained for the heavy loss of British life.…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics