# Simple Harmonic Motion

Topics: Oscillation, Harmonic oscillator, Force Pages: 6 (1228 words) Published: December 6, 2010
Physics Laboratory Report
Simple Harmonic Motion: Determining the force constant

Aim of experiment:
The objective of this experiment is:
1. To study the simple harmonic motion of a mass-spring system 2. To estimate the force constant of a spring

Principles involved:
A horizontal or vertical mass-spring system can perform simple harmonic motion as shown below. If we know the period (T) of the motion and the mass (m), the force constant (k) of the spring can be determined. [pic]

Consider pulling the mass of a horizontal mass-spring system to an extension x on a table, the mass subjected to a restoring force (F=-kx) stated by Hooke’s Law. If the mass is now released, it will move with acceleration (a) towards the equilibrium position. By Newton’s second law, the force (ma) acting on the mass is equal to the restoring force, i.e.

ma = -kx
a = -(k/m)x -------------------------(1) As the movement continues, it performs a simple harmonic motion with angular velocity (ω) and has acceleration (a = -ω2x). By comparing it with equation (1), we have: ω = √(k/m)

Thus, the period can be represented as follows:

T = 2π/ω
T = 2π x √(m/k)
T2 = (4π2/k) m ---------------------------(2)

From the equation, it can be seen that the period of the simple harmonic motion is independent of the amplitude. As the result also applies to vertical mass-spring system, a vertical mass-spring system, which has a smaller frictional effects, is used in this experiment.

Apparatus:
Slotted mass (20g)x 9
Hanger (20g)x 1
Springx 1
Retort stand and clampx 1
Stop watchx 1
G-clampx 1
Procedure:
1. The apparatuses were set up as shown on the right.
2. No slotted mass was originally put into the hanger and it was set to oscillate in moderate amplitude. 3. The period (t1) for 20 complete oscillations was measured and recorded. 4. Step 3 was repeated to obtain another record (t2).

5. Steps 2 to 4 were repeated by adding one slotted mass to the hanger each time until all of the nine given masses have been used. 6. A graph of the square of the period (T2) against mass (m) was plotted. 7. A best-fitted line was drawn on the graph and its slope was measured.

Precaution:
1. The oscillations of the spring were of moderate amplitudes to reduce errors. 2. The oscillations of the spring were carefully initiated so that the spring did not swing to ensure accurate results. 3. The spring used was carefully chosen that it could perform 20 oscillations with little decay in amplitude when the hanger was put on it, and it was not over-stretched when all the 9 slotted masses were put on it. This could ensure accurate and reliable results. 4. The experiment was carried out in a place with little air movement (wind), in order to reduce swinging of the spring during oscillations and errors of the experiment. 5. The spring was clamped tightly so that the spring did not slide during oscillation. It reduced energy loss from the spring and ensured accurate results. 6. A G-clamp was used to attach the stand firmly on the bench. This reduced energy loss from the spring and ensured accurate results.

Results
|Hanger and slotted mass |20 periods / s |One period (T) |T2 / s2 | |(m) / kg | |/ s | | | |t1 |t2 |Mean | | | | |(±0.1s) |(±0.1s) |= (t1 + t2) / 2 | | | |0.02 |5.0 |5.4 |5.2 |0.26 |0.0676 | |0.04 |6.0 |6.0 |6.0 |0.3 |0.09 | |0.06 |7.0...