When defining elections, Lynch (2004: 33) states that it is ‘at the heart of the democratic process.’ The main political activity for most people is to vote in an election. Through electoral process, governments are being chosen and elected before holding certain position in the office. To conduct such activity, an electoral system is needed.…
M2 – Compare the electoral processes used at different levels of government in the UK.…
A Political System has two segments, Democracy and Totalitarianism. Democracy is usually practiced in Western and Northern European countries. It gives the citizens the freedom and the rights to vote for multiple political officials, in which they feel that would be an advocate and help serve the needs of the people, the states, and the country. Some of these officials are voting in twice by the citizens, but there are time frames and limitations that a Politian can hold his or her sit in office. This gives other potential politics an opportunity to run for office in government, According to Doh and Luthans (2012) “Essentially, every citizen should be involved in decision-making processes. The representative government ensures individual freedom since anyone who is eligible may have a voice in the choices made (Doh & Luthans, p. 40).” Countries that practice such political system are allowing the voices of their citizens to be heard and made. However, Totalitarianism is indifferent from Democracy. The political system is ran…
It can be argued that Britain is both democratic and undemocratic; this can be shown via a range of issues relating to British politics and the society in which we live. The generally accepted definition of a democracy is a form of government in which the major decisions of government and the direction of policy behind these decisions - rests directly or indirectly on the freely given consent of the freely given consent of the freely majority of the adults government. There are two forms of democracy but the UK is run through an indirect or representative democracy as opposed to a direct democracy, which relies on referendums and would be difficult in a large, modern society. Furthermore, the UK is a parliamentary democracy, the government and representatives are intermingled meaning that the UK does not have separation of powers, meaning that the executive, legislative and judicial courts all work together unlike the American Presidential system which could create a lack in communication. In this essay, I propose to argue both for and against and eventually come to a conclusion whether the UK is democratic or not and give a comparison between the UK and the US in terms of democracy.…
Since 1997 with the labour government in charge, the UK have adopted various electoral systems. However, there are a number of problems with each systems and some systems are more proportional than others, for example the List System has a higher degree of proportional representation than the First Past The Post system which is used in UK general elections. In spite of this, there are good systems in Northern Ireland, like AMS which is very proportional and provides a simple outcome.…
With different political party systems there can be very different outcomes when it come to the satisfaction of voters with their political parties. The difference between Canada’s multiparty system and America’s two-party system is an unmistakable illustration of this. In this essay I will demonstrate how Canada’s representative democracy is better than America’s with respect to the number of political parties in each system because in America; fewer voters’ opinions are covered and politicians are attempting to win a greater percentage of votes at an expense.…
John Macionis and Ken Plummer discuss the multiple ways in which political activity exceeds or tries to do away with established practices. Whilst they claim that a political system tries to resolve controversy within a system of rules, their chapter “Power Beyond the Rules” describes politics as an entity which is a disagreement about goals and the means to achieve them.…
The Parliamentary system in Great Britain and the Presidential system in the United States both have histories marked by an absence of abject failure, yet neither system can be considered truly perfect. Consequently, the analyst cannot conclude that either system is better; rather, he must recognize that there are merits and faults in both systems. The Parliamentary system tends to legislate efficiently, whereas a presidential system tends toward gridlock. However, the presidential system grants both elected representatives and citizens greater influence in government. The Parliamentary system tends to favor Prime Ministers who have much experience, whereas the Presidential system…
Jamaica is a constitutional parliamentary democracy. The fusion of United States and England's governments is apparent simply from this name, with democracy relating to the U.S. and the parliament…
Today, the two most prominent forms of government are the Parliamentary form of government, often known as the Westminster system seen in the commonwealth nations; and the Presidential form of government seen in the United States. Throughout the years, many debates have been discussed over the question of which form is better; no definitive answer has ever come forward, for the exception that they are both quite different in theory and in practice. Principally, the difference among them is the separation power seen in the Presidential system, and the coexistence of power seen in the Parliamentary system; represented chiefly by party discipline. However, more than this difference alone separates the two. Both forms of government are characterized by how their power is distributed, how laws are created and chosen, party discipline and also the responsibility of each Head of State. Each system has its own dynamic and ever-changing functionality, creating advantages and disadvantages for each system.1…
“Despite its flaws the ‘First past the post’ electoral systems for general elections suits Great Britain”…
The UK political system has often been criticized on it level of democracy. However, there are methods or institutes that could be adopted to make the political system more democratic in nature.…
“The UK electoral system produces unrepresentative results and should switch to a form of proportional representation. Discuss.”…
Bogdanor, Vernon. and Butler, David. (eds.) (1983) Democracy and elections: electoral systems and their political consequences. Australia: Cambridge University Press.…
The two most common types of democratic governmental systems are Parliamentary systems and Presidential systems. For many years, people have studied the effectiveness of both and have given reasons why a certain country should obtain a certain form of government. Examples of two countries that use these systems are Canada and the United States. Canada uses a traditional parliamentary system, and the United States uses a presidential system. In this paper, I will focus on the strengths of a parliamentary system, and the weaknesses of a presidential system, to prove my argument. Canada is better off with a parliamentary system then a presidential system for many reasons. In order for my argument to be persuasive, I will explain the differences in the two. In comparison to a presidential system, a parliamentary system has more closure in making decisions, the parties that exist within the system tend to be stronger, and there is a responsible government, which allows for the government leader to be more actively involved with its citizens.…