Preview

Similarities and Differences Between Britains and Jamaica's Political System

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
819 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Similarities and Differences Between Britains and Jamaica's Political System
Rummel describes political systems as “the formal and informal structures which manifest the state’s sovereignty over a territory and people”. Now, sovereignty in politics is said to be concerned with the ‘right’ of a given country to have national control over a country’s territory. Norman Grindley and Anthony Woodburn, in an article published in the gleaner on February 14, 2002 describes a political system as “one which seeks to identify and satisfy the demands of its citizens as best as possible.” They also mentioned that the mandate of a political system is to maximize the utilization of all resources in order to arrive at society’s desired goals. Combining both definitions, we can say that a political system is the formal and informal structures which gives a state the right to have general control over a country’s territorial space and its citizens, by aiming to satisfy the demands of those citizens by making the best use of all available resources. The Westminster system originates from the Palace of Westminster, the home of the British House of Parliament. It is an adversarial two party system that utilizes a single member plurality system. The plurality system is where voters simply place a mark next to their preferred candidate. The candidate receiving the highest number of votes wins. This allocation rule is referred to as "first past the post." Grindley and Woodburn noted that each nation has adapted, adopted or created a system of government that is considered consistent and compatible with its citizen’s socio-political-economic, cultural and environmental needs. They also hypothesized that each political system varies according to its philosophy and culture. I share their perspective. Thus, we can infer that Britain and Jamaica has political cultures which defers. In their article, Grindley and Woodburn identifies Jamaica’s political system as “the export model of the British Westminster-Whitehall model.” They pointed out that Jamaica adopted this

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Additional Member System

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When defining elections, Lynch (2004: 33) states that it is ‘at the heart of the democratic process.’ The main political activity for most people is to vote in an election. Through electoral process, governments are being chosen and elected before holding certain position in the office. To conduct such activity, an electoral system is needed.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Assignment 2 2014 2015

    • 480 Words
    • 3 Pages

    M2 – Compare the electoral processes used at different levels of government in the UK.…

    • 480 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Political System has two segments, Democracy and Totalitarianism. Democracy is usually practiced in Western and Northern European countries. It gives the citizens the freedom and the rights to vote for multiple political officials, in which they feel that would be an advocate and help serve the needs of the people, the states, and the country. Some of these officials are voting in twice by the citizens, but there are time frames and limitations that a Politian can hold his or her sit in office. This gives other potential politics an opportunity to run for office in government, According to Doh and Luthans (2012) “Essentially, every citizen should be involved in decision-making processes. The representative government ensures individual freedom since anyone who is eligible may have a voice in the choices made (Doh & Luthans, p. 40).” Countries that practice such political system are allowing the voices of their citizens to be heard and made. However, Totalitarianism is indifferent from Democracy. The political system is ran…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How democratic is the UK

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It can be argued that Britain is both democratic and undemocratic; this can be shown via a range of issues relating to British politics and the society in which we live. The generally accepted definition of a democracy is a form of government in which the major decisions of government and the direction of policy behind these decisions - rests directly or indirectly on the freely given consent of the freely given consent of the freely majority of the adults government. There are two forms of democracy but the UK is run through an indirect or representative democracy as opposed to a direct democracy, which relies on referendums and would be difficult in a large, modern society. Furthermore, the UK is a parliamentary democracy, the government and representatives are intermingled meaning that the UK does not have separation of powers, meaning that the executive, legislative and judicial courts all work together unlike the American Presidential system which could create a lack in communication. In this essay, I propose to argue both for and against and eventually come to a conclusion whether the UK is democratic or not and give a comparison between the UK and the US in terms of democracy.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since 1997 with the labour government in charge, the UK have adopted various electoral systems. However, there are a number of problems with each systems and some systems are more proportional than others, for example the List System has a higher degree of proportional representation than the First Past The Post system which is used in UK general elections. In spite of this, there are good systems in Northern Ireland, like AMS which is very proportional and provides a simple outcome.…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    With different political party systems there can be very different outcomes when it come to the satisfaction of voters with their political parties. The difference between Canada’s multiparty system and America’s two-party system is an unmistakable illustration of this. In this essay I will demonstrate how Canada’s representative democracy is better than America’s with respect to the number of political parties in each system because in America; fewer voters’ opinions are covered and politicians are attempting to win a greater percentage of votes at an expense.…

    • 2292 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Macionis and Ken Plummer discuss the multiple ways in which political activity exceeds or tries to do away with established practices. Whilst they claim that a political system tries to resolve controversy within a system of rules, their chapter “Power Beyond the Rules” describes politics as an entity which is a disagreement about goals and the means to achieve them.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Parliamentary system in Great Britain and the Presidential system in the United States both have histories marked by an absence of abject failure, yet neither system can be considered truly perfect. Consequently, the analyst cannot conclude that either system is better; rather, he must recognize that there are merits and faults in both systems. The Parliamentary system tends to legislate efficiently, whereas a presidential system tends toward gridlock. However, the presidential system grants both elected representatives and citizens greater influence in government. The Parliamentary system tends to favor Prime Ministers who have much experience, whereas the Presidential system…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Jamaica is a constitutional parliamentary democracy. The fusion of United States and England's governments is apparent simply from this name, with democracy relating to the U.S. and the parliament…

    • 1437 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today, the two most prominent forms of government are the Parliamentary form of government, often known as the Westminster system seen in the commonwealth nations; and the Presidential form of government seen in the United States. Throughout the years, many debates have been discussed over the question of which form is better; no definitive answer has ever come forward, for the exception that they are both quite different in theory and in practice. Principally, the difference among them is the separation power seen in the Presidential system, and the coexistence of power seen in the Parliamentary system; represented chiefly by party discipline. However, more than this difference alone separates the two. Both forms of government are characterized by how their power is distributed, how laws are created and chosen, party discipline and also the responsibility of each Head of State. Each system has its own dynamic and ever-changing functionality, creating advantages and disadvantages for each system.1…

    • 1624 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Despite its flaws the ‘First past the post’ electoral systems for general elections suits Great Britain”…

    • 1268 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The UK political system has often been criticized on it level of democracy. However, there are methods or institutes that could be adopted to make the political system more democratic in nature.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The UK electoral system produces unrepresentative results and should switch to a form of proportional representation. Discuss.”…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Bogdanor, Vernon. and Butler, David. (eds.) (1983) Democracy and elections: electoral systems and their political consequences. Australia: Cambridge University Press.…

    • 1625 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Political Science Paper

    • 2048 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The two most common types of democratic governmental systems are Parliamentary systems and Presidential systems. For many years, people have studied the effectiveness of both and have given reasons why a certain country should obtain a certain form of government. Examples of two countries that use these systems are Canada and the United States. Canada uses a traditional parliamentary system, and the United States uses a presidential system. In this paper, I will focus on the strengths of a parliamentary system, and the weaknesses of a presidential system, to prove my argument. Canada is better off with a parliamentary system then a presidential system for many reasons. In order for my argument to be persuasive, I will explain the differences in the two. In comparison to a presidential system, a parliamentary system has more closure in making decisions, the parties that exist within the system tend to be stronger, and there is a responsible government, which allows for the government leader to be more actively involved with its citizens.…

    • 2048 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays