Preview

Should We Trust Reason Rather than Perception?

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
306 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Should We Trust Reason Rather than Perception?
Reason and perception are two main methods which we use in our live very different from each other. Reason is the way we obtain knowledge by means of our justifications and perception is the way we obtain knowledge by our experiences. This two methods are not perfect are in part right ma not always. In my opinion, however I think that reason is a more reliable method for gaining knowledge. This is only because when making a decision based on reason you have to deal with at least two different facts with coming up with the final conclusion. While with perception everything you see may seem like this, but in life we learn that isn't always like this and you can come out with only a little part of the information that you could have with the use of reason. You can't trust things or people you have not identified.
However although this two methods are different they have also some similiarities. Reason and perception are two vastly different ways of knowing however they both have similarities in their strengths and limitations. Reason is viewed as the ultimate source of knowing by rationalists as it involves logic as in saying that two plus three will always equal five and nothing else. Reason can be misleading as various forms of knowledge including perception conflict with the ideal behind rationalism as a way of knowing. Perception has a major strength as a way of knowing because we can physically experience the emotion and the occurrence. This way of knowing is known as Empiricism. Empiricists argue that the ultimate source of knowledge is experience. However this to has its own limits because the question “how do you know that that actually happened?” can be asked.

In Conclusion, reason and perception are dependent one on the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In Critique of Pure Reason Kant discusses the dispute between rationalism and empiricism. The empiricists argued that all ideas are derived from sensation, and that objects of sensation are the only proper objects of knowledge. The rationalists argued that some ideas are not derived from sensation but are instead innate to reason, and that these ideas provide one with knowledge of supersensible realities such as God. Kant argues how knowledge is devoted to the power of demonstrating the truth or falsity of an idea, and that this power is restricted to the domain of sensibility. He stated that…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Our reasoning can be false and lead us to false conclusions about what we should do. However, can our experiences not lead us to false conclusions as well? The unfortunate thing is that we can be wrong in a variety of ways. It's interestingly difficult to identify a single belief that you have come your way by means of some sense experience via sight, hearing, touch, smell, or taste. It's natural, then, to come to believe that the senses are the sole source and ultimate grounding of…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the 18th century, Locke came up with the term empiricism. Empiricism is the view that most knowledge is derived from experience, which means from both senses and inner thoughts. Empiricism is based on high probability, since it is based in the past. Empiricists refuse the idea that reason produces any knowledge about the world itself. Moreover, they strongly deny the existence of any innate knowledge - knowledge that exists in the mind prior to experience or rational activity. For example, ideas that one is born with.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In rationalism, reasoning and understanding is more important than the senses to the establishment of knowledge. Sense experience is an incoming visual, aural, touch,…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why we believe what we see? Actually, the real reason why our eyes deceive us is that our eyes function in our brains. The eye is quite a complex part of the body. There are more than a billion parts work together in the same time. The vision is an important sense which is supported by the brain that receives the information from the eye. Firstly, as light enters the eye, “it passes through a thin transparent protective shield on the front of the eye”, which is called the cornea. The clear cornea helps the eye to focus the incoming light by bending them. Then the rays enter the pupil. “Pupil is the black hole in the center of the eye”, which regulates the amount of light incoming. Moreover, as light conditions change, the iris, as the colored part of the eye, may also control more or less light into the eye by expanding to make the pupil bigger or shrinking to make the pupil smaller. Thirdly, after light travels through the pupil, it will pass through the lens, which is controlled by a band of muscle named the ciliary muscle. Actually, just like the lens of a camera, the human lens is responsible to focus light. It can change its shape to make the nearby or far distant objects reflect on the retina clearly. Fourthly, light is going to enter the retina after passing through the centre of the eye vitreous. “The retina is a thin, light sensitive membrane that lines the inner of the eye”. Much like film in a camera, it is responsible for converting the vision to the optic nerve. What’s more, the centre of the retina is called the macula. Because it contains a high concentration of photoreceptor, it can tell the brain what we are seeing. As the last step, “optic nerve sends all visual information from the eye to the brain”, which is what we see at last. Because of these, sometimes we are treated by ourselves.…

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rationalist philosophers believe that our knowledge derives from reason and the opposing philosophers; empiricists believe that all our knowledge comes from sense experience. Saying that our sense impressions would be unintelligible without the conceptual scheme is problematic for empiricists because if this were true, all their ideas would be incorrect. Philosopher Immanuel Kant who is in between the two theories has a different take on as to where our knowledge comes from. Kant believed we were born with categories in our mind such as unity, substance and causality, these make up the conceptual scheme. Kant says the conceptual scheme is used to turn sense data into experience, he argues that without the conceptual scheme the world would be a ‘blooming, buzzing confusion.’…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The difference between truth and knowledge itself moreover is a much simpler matter. Since the only semantic distinction between the two is that, truth is anything that is in accord with fact or reality whereas knowledge are any facts, information, and skills acquired through experience or education. However from an epistemological perspective disagreement still remain about whether our senses can be trusted to discover the ultimate nature of reality and subsequently establish if the perceived world as we know it is not just an illusion or a dream.…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, to what degree is reason a reliable way of making decisions? As we all know, reason is very much based on logic as well as personal experiences.…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Truth vs. Perception

    • 2314 Words
    • 10 Pages

    What is the key difference between ‘truth’ and ‘perception’, and which is more important? The truth is the reality of the fact while perception is the truth relative to oneself. The mind, the nature of the metaphysical of a human being is different to everyone else’s. Everyone has lived different lives; experiencing different passions, interests, suffering and possessing different capacities in knowledge. People are also brought up in different ways, belonging to different cultures and religions. This diverse array of factors is what makes us who we are, affecting and contributing to our views and perspectives. When contemplating the ‘truth’, it is filtered through a wide spectrum of experiences, knowledge and emotions, resulting in ones perception. For example, an orange is orange, which is the truth. If you look at it through green glasses, it will appear green but the truth is that the orange remains orange. Perception is like the green glasses, filtering the truth relative to the person that is perceiving it.…

    • 2314 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Descartes vs Locke

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The study of knowledge, or epistemology, contains theoretical methods in which information is learned. Of these methods, there are two that are most widely accepted. Rationalism and empiricism are also the most widely debated methods of knowledge. Rationalism claims that a priori processes and intuition gain knowledge. Rationalism claims that knowledge is innate; but that it varies among humans. At the other end of the spectrum, empiricism claims that knowledge is gained largely by experience, observation, and sensory perception.…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Epistemology Phil/201 Quiz

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages

    | __________________ combined rationalism and empiricism, showing how both played a role in our understanding…

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Saadia’s theory of knowledge, Israel Efros believes sense perception is one of the most reliable forms of truth. He uses examples, such as feeling an object and believing it is hot. This belief is completely reliable and true and was not assumed because of an accident. I completely agree with Saadia and Efro’s anaylsis of sense perception. I believe the most important aspect in seeking the greatest and…

    • 1750 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Locke Vs Berkley

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Empiricism is the belief that knowledge is gained through experience. Empiricism was a way for philosophers to answer the question of skepticism. Both John Locke and George Berkeley believed the theory of empiricism to a certain extent. Locke believed our knowledge is not inherited but came from our senses and our senses could be split into two group: primary and secondary qualities. The main disagreement Berkeley had with Locke was his view concerning primary and secondary qualities. Berkeley was a firm believer that knowledge came from experience and without secondary qualities, a person could not perceive an object (Berkeley 21); however, Locke believed secondary qualities were not necessary to perceive an object. While both philosophers…

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dell, R. M., and D. A. J. Rand. Understanding Batteries. Cambridge, UK: The Royal Society…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    However, does reason really help us in our quest for knowledge or is it a poor way of finding out about the world? Despite much scientific investigation and historical knowledge there are many questions in the world that are left unanswered and unexplained. These questions are sometimes fundamental to life itself. For example, how are we…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics