English Persuasive Speech
Should the Death sentence be prohibited?
“An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind.”
M. K. Gandhi.
Should it be allowed? To have the authority to kill a human being that could possibly be innocent? Most agree that it is not right to have the death penalty in all countries. One very good reason for this is that it costs far more to execute a person than to keep him or her in prison for life. A 2011 study found that California has spent more than £4 billion on capital punishment since it was reinstated in 1978 and that death penalty trials are 20 times more expensive than trials seeking a sentence of life in prison without possibility of parole. California currently spends £184 million on the death penalty each year and is on track to spend £1 billion in the next five years. One billion pounds! Imagine what you could buy with that! Rather than keeping them in prison and let them find evidence to see if they were innocent or not. In a civilised country, like America, even the government doesn’t have the right to literally do what the criminals did to their victims. Like the punishment for arson, shouldn’t be to burn down the arsonist’s house as a penalty. Therefore, we should not punish murder with death. The death penalty is simply a barbaric remnant of an uncivilised society. One of the biggest problems about the death penalty is that the amount of people that were executed and were innocent. These ghastly mistakes cannot be rectified, 140 men and women have been released from Death Row and some only minutes away from execution. In the past four years, four people that were killed were wrongly executed for crimes that they didn’t commit. This error rate is simply appalling, and completely unacceptable, when we are talking about matters of life and death. Some may argue that the death penalty is a fundamental piece of a jigsaw for preserving law and order, that it deters crime, and it costs less than imprisonment for...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document