Should we as Americans be the ones to judge someone to death? That is what happens every time that a criminal is sentenced to death. The death penalty is a major debate that Americans have faced for many years. Who are we though to commit a crime against one who committed the wrongful crime? Doesn’t this make us just as guilty as the criminal? Through this paper we will explore the pros, cons, and whether the death penalty serves to morally normalize society. The death penalty is a major debate in the United States that many feel is wrong, and has been for many years. There are thirty-five states in the United States that still uphold the death penalty. Out of the other fifteen states that have abolished the death penalty three of them have abolished it within the past five years. “New Jersey was the first state to abolish the death penalty in the last forty years” (http://www.democracynow.org/2007/12/14/new_jersey_votes_to_abolish_death). New Jersey and New York both abolished the death penalty because the state commission stated, “The death penalty was too expensive, showed no proof of deterrent effect, and risked killing an innocent person” (http://www.democracynow.org/2007/12/14/new_jersey_votes_to_abolish_death). New Jersey abolished the death penalty act at the same time in which the U.S. Supreme Court was questioning whether the death penalty violated the eighth constitutional right., The eighth constitutional right states, “ Prohibits the federal government from imposing excessive bail, excessive fines, and cruel and unusual punishment” (http://law.jrank.org/pages/6368/Eighth-Amendment.html). All these reasons that New Jersey abolished the death penalty for is the main reasons to abolish the death penalty all together. The death penalty shows some very disturbing cons that would make anyone think twice about sentencing anyone to death. There are five major cons that will make goose bumps come upon your body after they are explained. These five cons include: 1.
Possibility of killing an innocent person
It violates the eighth constitutional right of cruel and unusual punishment 3.
Spending life behind bars is a better and more effective punishment than the death penalty 4.
The death penalty cost more in the long run than life in prison without parole 5.
Sends the wrong message to society and other countries
These cons once discussed will prove to show that the death penalty should be abolished in all states. The first con was that society could possibly execute someone who may be innocent. 138 convicted death row inmates have been pardoned or proved innocent from their crime since 1973. That is a shocking four inmates a year that would have been executed is it were not for the help of the Death Penalty Organization. How do we as Americans justify the real fact of innocence? This is facts that make my body cringe at the thought in the past thirty-eight years we as Americans may have killed four innocent inmates per year. This is very disturbing facts that I don’t think many Americans would want to live with on their conscience. What if you knew that you friend or family member were innocent, but were sentenced to death? What would you do if you done everything to try and prove their innocence but they were executed? This is happening in America today it may not be your friend or family member, but it is someone’s friend or family member. This shows that the death penalty should be reconsidered in the states that still have it, and should be abolished. There are many other reasons that people are wrongfully accused. Even in the light of new technology we are still convicting innocent people to death. Some of the other reasons that people get wrongfully accused include: 1.
Not having sufficient legal expertise
Mistaken eye witnesses
Misrepresentation of evidence
Pressure from state officials to solve a case
These are all reasons that can relate to an...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document