Preview

should nuclear weapons be destroyed?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
580 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
should nuclear weapons be destroyed?
Should all nuclear weapons be destroyed?

Today countries all over the world put a significant amount of their budget towards defense and the security along the lines of their borders. Governments all around the world have put great stress on the fact of continuously developing nuclear weapons; this is to help establish their strength over other weaker countries with none or little nuclear power.
The first thing that comes to my mind when nuclear weapons are brought into conversation is the Hiroshima-Nagasaki incident that took far too many lives and the effects of the disaster still linger and find their roots to these nuclear weapons. The tremendous amount of deaths that it resulted in forced authorities and the world community to look at nuclear weapons more as weapons of mass destruction more than anything else. Looking at these things in a clearer light today, there is still a lot of uncertainty that is brought to the world community about nuclear weapons. Some delegates look to make strategic allies around the world, however the developments and the stress that all the governments lay on nuclear weapons raises too much suspicion to other major countries. On one end, the world community is trying of make the use of nuclear weapons seem positive towards humankind, the other end shows a pretty negative meaning to it, which mostly speaking of the terror aspect and the establishment of power it brings. Better put as the race to be on the top with most of the power.
With more and more countries being able to access nuclear weapons, a debate has been brought to question. This debate talks about if these nuclear weapons are a means of security or threat, but has also been a major breakthrough in making countries realize each other's value. The other side believes that this has just widened the gap between the powerful and the less powerful countries.
The most common test with nuclear weapons are brought out by a country to remind their enemies of the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Iran's Nuclear Program

    • 1439 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “Now I am become death, the destroyer of worlds,” (Oppenheimer, 1965, 0:47). So said Julius Robert Oppenheimer, one of the men credited with creating the atomic bomb, when describing the first test detonation of a nuclear weapon on July 16, 1945, at the Alamogordo Bomb Range in New Mexico ( Sublette, 1999), as he quotes the Hindu holy text, the Bhagavad Vita. Nuclear weapons have only been used in warfare twice, both times by the United States during World War I, when the United States dropped the ‘Fat Man’ and ‘Little Boy’ bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August, 1945 (Sublette, 1999). In the 60 intervening years, a number of other nations have since developed nuclear weapons of their own. Because of nuclear proliferation, and the unparalleled destructive power of atomic weapons, nuclear non-proliferation has become an international concern, with the United States leading the charge. The past decade, however, has seen new nations try to enter the ‘nuclear club’ the most recent country being Iran. A nuclear armed Iran poses many concerns to the United States. In this paper, I will discuss the history of Iran’s nuclear program, what steps have been taken to curb the Iranians efforts, and where the two major political parties of the United States stand on the issue.…

    • 1439 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every time I hear a word "War" as a child, I still have to hear a word "Nuclear Weapons". From that time, I didn't know what they are. But when I grow up, I learned that Nuclear Weapons are the device that can destroy many people or one small country. So I believe that They are the killing device. From these reasons…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The nuclear resources of the United States and the Soviet Union are larger, better equipped, and deadlier than at any other time in history. This incisive book contends that the superpowers, while exhibiting…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The existence of nuclear weapons for better or worse have indubitably impacted our lives in one way or the other. There are the some who find these weapons to be singularly beneficial. For example Defence Analyst Edward Luttwak said “we have lived since 1945 without another world war precisely because rational minds…extracted a durable peace from the very terror of nuclear weapons.” (Luttwak, 1983). Moreover, Robert Art and Kenneth Waltz both extrapolate that “the probability of war between American and Russia or between NATO and the Warsaw Pact is practically nil precisely because the military planning and deployments of each, together with the fear of escalation to general nuclear war, keep it that way.” (Art, Waltz, 1983) Yet there are many who also share the view of Jonathan Schell who dramatically infers that if we, society, do not “rise up and cleanse the earth of nuclear weapons, we will “sink into the final coma and end it all.” (Schell, 1982) The central purpose of this essay is to challenge the conventional wisdom about nuclear proliferation; that nuclear weapons do indeed induce a greater stability amongst international politics however this does not justify countries to continue nuclear arms proliferation with seemingly no endless bounds. However despite this it is naïve to declare that a world without nuclear weapons would be without peace either. Nuclear weapons are more than just symbols of destruction and chaos but however hold far more important roles in international politics. They are at the forefront of national security and hold considerable importance in domestic debates and internal bureaucratic struggles and serve as international normative symbols of modernity and identity and as such have to be treated with utmost care and with a sense of supreme responsibility by countries that hold them.…

    • 2181 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A fundamental component of the proliferation debate revolves around the perceived or alleged efficiency of nuclear deterrence. Proliferation optimists argue that, “more may be better” because nuclear weapons increase the cost of nuclear conflict, ultimately deterring states from engaging in nuclear warfare with a nuclear-armed state (Suzuki 2015). Optimists argue that nuclear deterrence works reliably, thus there seemingly less to be feared from nuclear proliferation and beneficial to a state to…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nuclear weapons have only ever been used once in human history, and that was during World War II when The United States deployed missiles on Japanese territory, in Nagasaki and Hiroshima. At the time of bombing in 1945 only the USA had developed nuclear weapons, whilst today the pool of states consisting of nuclear weapons is still extremely small, with only nine states laying claim to nuclear technology and weaponry. This nuclear proliferation is explained by Darryl Howlett who explains this as the worldwide spread of nuclear weapons. For Howlett states are nuclear driven because of the ‘strategic, political and prestige benefits’ attached to nuclear weapons[1]. In the modern world the mass media are often critical about nuclear weapons and the threats they pose for society, but this begs the question; why have nuclear weapons not been used in conflict since 1945? To answer this question the issues of taboo and deterrence and the arrival of virtual nuclear arsenals must be called into question, as well as theoretical ideas such as rationality from proliferation optimists and proliferation pessimists. I will also look at whether we currently live in a non-proliferation regime, and look at the alternatives for peace and nuclear non-usage.…

    • 2145 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    The fear of nuclear devastation has so far created peace and prevented a third world war. Rather than weapons of war, strategic weapons are becoming weapons of intimidation used to influence political and strategic outcomes. The actual likelihood of a nuclear warhead being used becomes slimmer by the day, with non-proliferation treaties, campaigns such as ‘Ground Zero’ and regulations on transporting nuclear weapons becoming stricter and stricter. The publication of a volume edited by…

    • 2202 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A nuclear weapon is a weapon that gets it’s destructive power by turning matter into energy. All nuclear weapons are explosives(usually missiles).They can be transported by missiles, bombs,tank shells,mines, or torpedoes. The most destructive nuclear weapons are far more poweful than any conventional(non nuclear) weapon. A nuclear weapon used in a large city could kill millions of people. A large nuclear war could devastate the Earth’s climate and ability to support life(a.k.a nuclear winter).…

    • 74 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mark gave some details about the importance of the US presence in Asian area and how the US military tries to stop North Korea’s nuclear ambition. If North Korea can make nuclear weapon, it will bring negative effects on the peace and security in the area. Through the article, I know more about the importance of nuclear weapon in military and how it will be if the North Korea develops nuclear weapon.…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main reason nuclear weapons should be banned is the simple fact that they kill or severely injure. The most remembered use of a nuclear weapon was during World War 2, when we, the U.S., used the bomb on Nagasaki and Hiroshima killing millions and destroying everything in those cities. Not everyone died at once, some people died instantly while others died a slow, agonizing, painful death. The painful death was caused by fallout, which is a radioactive chemical used in making the bomb. The chemical is usually radium or plutonium, and is very deadly when inhaled. The stuff is spread everywhere when the bomb explodes, and then falls to the earth as light dust. If a person intakes a small amount they have a chance at living, but with severe health problems for the rest of their life. Large amounts will eat away the insides of a human, and eventually kill him. The related health problems could be anywhere from heart, lung, or kidney problems, etc. These health problems will lead to an earlier death than normal, but will also lead to medical bills beyond belief.…

    • 779 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In conclusion, the fact that these two countries possess such destructible power not only puts in danger the lives of those who inhabit the places where these arsenals are deployed, but the entire planet earth. Meanwhile, people around the world can only wait in the…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout history very few events have bore the weight of the decision to deploy the first atomic weapons. Historians have placed the decision along racial, political, and tactical lines, while the reasons for the use of atomic weapons are still debated, the lasting effects of this event are just as important. Currently there are nine countries that possess the capability to deploy nuclear weapons; countries like North Korea and Iran are currently conducting limited research to development nuclear weapons. While the bomb was herald as the tool that ended World War II, the legacy of the first Atomic bomb brought American into the Atomic age, and into a weapons race with Russia.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    November 9, 1989. As the Berlin Wall fell and the Iron Curtain was lifted from Europe, the ever looming threat of nuclear annihilation was too lifted from the world. It appeared to be the dawning of a new era of global cooperation and prosperity. However this thin veil of peace was short lasting. A new century brought new threats: Chinese aggression in the South China Sea, Iran’s pursuit of nuclear weapons, the Russian annexation of Crimea. However the new century also brought new technology. America’s nuclear arsenal is aging, and something must be done about it. Due to increasing world tension and the advancement of modern technology, the United States should modernize its nuclear arsenal by replacing and upgrading its current weapons and weapon platforms.…

    • 1657 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even if only 100 bombs go off, scientists say that is enough to plunge the world into a nuclear winter. The soot and debris that would be sent into the atmosphere would cool the planet, potentially thrusting the earth into a doomsday event. In 1983 New Zealand became the first Western Nation to become nuclear free and we still are to this day. However, this does not make us immune to the global impact that a nuclear war can bring. The cooling of the planet is one consequence, but there are many more consequences of a nuclear war. It can cause natural disasters such as a tsunami, the melting of the ice caps and glaciers which increase the sea level and drown many islands such as New Zealand. Not only that we would be harming many wildlife in the process of a nuclear war. Another consequence of having nuclear weapons is that money is wasted. The United Nation says to abolish world hunger it would take a staggering thirty billion per year. Yet one hundred and seven billion dollars is spent on nuclear weapons. One hundred and seven billion is spent per year to potentially wipe out earth while there are undernourished children and adults in third world…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On contrary, the use of nuclear weapons is a horrendous issue. The world has only ever seen a nuclear bomb in action twice; at the end of WW2 when America fired it at Japan, in which 250,000 people were killed and entire cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays