Countries with Nuclear Weapons Capability:
Acknowledged: U.K., China, France, India, Pakistan, Russia, United States, Israel, North Korea1
Seeking: Syria, Iran
Abandoned: South Africa constructed but then voluntarily dismantled six uranium bombs. Belarus, Kazakhstan, Ukraine; when Soviet Union broke up, these former states possessed nuclear warheads that they have since given up and declared themselves non-nuclear weapon states.
Source: U.S. State Department, TIME magazine and the Nuclear Threat Initiative.
After get to know all this little but important information I can say that those Nuclear Nations shouldn’t disarm their nuclear weapons. Maybe it can sound so rude but after all the things that happened in 9/11 and the war in Syria it can be terrified to those nations to be unprotected in case anything happen. For example if they disarm their nuclear weapons they going to be like a rich house without a padlock.
It can be easy to say “Disarm your nuclear weapon” but imagine United States without this, it’s like to sign their own death warrant and worst because this country has a historical responsibility to those nations that are under communist and also the one that are able to get to like South Korea all this by the policy of containment. In the main moment that US get to disarm their nuclear weapons we can considered this our last day in this world because their enemies will attack immediately.
Actually this is not just about US countries as Pakistan and China are really close to be burn if they take this stupid decision and just like them any president that put this as a choice to stop war because it can end a war of course but with more than one country disappearing. My point is that as long as they can get a country save by having this weapons they don’t have to worry about nothing really.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Since the 1980’s, the two superpowers have reduced their nuclear weapons by almost 70%. Today, we still have more nuclear weapons than any military purpose could justify. Unfortunately, the command and control system in Russia has deteriorated further.…
- 866 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
“A world free of nuclear weapons is a global public good of the highest order” (Ki-Moon). Ban Ki-Moon is the United Nations Secretary-General. Ki-Moon was born in South Korea, in the past, wars tore through South Korea and had received threats of nuclear destruction. Because of these tragic events, Ki-Moon feels very strongly that nuclear weapons are the world’s greatest threat (Ki-Moon). Ki-Moon was not the only to think this way. After World War l, the American people also started to see how destructive the weapons were. Senator William Borah proposed disarmament in 1920. The proposition became popular very quickly throughout the United States (Brookhiser). Although the idea of disarmament had caught on, the United States’s nuclear stockpile…
- 808 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
A nuclear weapon is a weapon that gets it’s destructive power by turning matter into energy. All nuclear weapons are explosives(usually missiles).They can be transported by missiles, bombs,tank shells,mines, or torpedoes. The most destructive nuclear weapons are far more poweful than any conventional(non nuclear) weapon. A nuclear weapon used in a large city could kill millions of people. A large nuclear war could devastate the Earth’s climate and ability to support life(a.k.a nuclear winter).…
- 74 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
I agree with the nuclear optimists that nuclear proliferation will make international politics more stable and less war prone. Since nuclear weapons are classified as weapons of mass destruction (WMDs), more specifically as true WMD (Baylis pg 386), I believe states that possess nuclear weapons will be reluctant to use them against states who also possess nuclear weapons, out of the fear those state will retaliate with their own nuclear weapons. The use of nuclear weapons poses risk to a state that chooses to use a nuclear weapon against another nuclear proliferated state. Therefore, by this logic it benefits to a state to be nuclear proliferated as a defensive precaution or a deterrence mechanism.…
- 581 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
If some other country was to obtain these weapons and we had none, we would be at their mercy. There are a lot of maniacs out there who have the ability to rise to power and gain support, just like Hitler, Stalin, or Mussolini did. Once these kinds of leaders gain power, they can obtain nuclear weapons. Even though none of them did, they had the power to, and the only reason they didn’t is because they didn’t live in the nuclear age. However, we were still watching these leaders to make sure they weren’t making weapons of mass destruction. This proved to be a waste of time because they never did, but even while we were watching them, Hitler was still able to create more innovative and useful weapons that he…
- 1791 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Many people wonder about the future of the world as more powerful nuclear weapons are developed. The U.S. should learn from the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and discontinue the development and production of nuclear weapons because the bombs will create unforeseen damage, prompt other countries to produce…
- 1057 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The nuclear bomb is dangerous and scary weapon that really should have never been thought of or invented. Nuclear bombs have been the focal point of every country's scientists ever since World War II when the U.S. dropped them on Japan. Just seeing the death and destruction a nuclear bomb can cause to people and the environment just proves my point. Not one person should have the power to just be able to push a button and have the ability to tear another country to shreds.…
- 399 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
In the event that these nations debilitate to utilize these bombs, which we know will be totally destroying to our country, I feel the best way to react is with a similar message, and we should be prepared for them. The United States needs to figure out how to incapacitate alternate nations totally with the goal that we may devastate the atomic weapons, yet we realize that is a substantial errand that would be hard to…
- 77 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
“Everyone in the world is threatened by the existence of nuclear weapons. Has anyone the right to wield such destructive power?” (Morality of Nuclear Deterrent) Many people in the United States disagree on whether the United States should keep nuclear weapons. Mainly because of the moral factor. Yes, it is dangerous for countries to own such a powerful figure that threatens millions of people around the world, but the world is trapped by this idea of possible idea of nuclear war that just about every country has on these weapons of mass destruction and will continue to make more to show dominance over the other countries who don’t have as much. The moral factor that is sure to be constantly brought up by many people about keeping our nuclear weapons will always be discussed since the greater damage these weapons cause. For example, when the United Stated bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Yes it was tactically right decision and prevented imperialism from expanding, and preventing the cause of japan gaining complete dominance over the world had to be overlooked when coming into the moral play off of the all the people who were affected by this disaster to their country. These cities where quite larger, but not to big so there…
- 1607 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Instead we should look for tools of peace, methods of tranquility. The United States is devoted to “fight for the common defense” not vaporize and lay to waste its opponent. There is always a better way and we need to go out and find it, because we can no longer live in nuclear…
- 741 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The US propelled atomic weapons in the mornings of August sixth and August ninth of 1945 to Japan, producing a huge number of honest deads, without tallying the back ones caused by the radiation that was in the place. Atomic weapons are probably the most huge executing gadgets weapons that have ever existed. This weapon can burn people that are in the epicenter of the bomb and the spots encompassing it in not more than seconds. This weapon ought to be dispensed with from earth since it is a peril to the planet and people, a reality that is much more terrible than creating a few many years of "worldwide peace". Likewise, it is an unfeeling approach to murder a person, that is against to any sort of good esteem.…
- 427 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
To better prepare for threats from weapon of mass destruction the United States should never under estimate the power and capability of foreign allies such as China, Russia, North Korea, Iran and Iraq to strike the United States. In addition, the National Resource Defense Counsel Report should keep track of the nuclear warheads that each country has. As…
- 411 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Evidence does exist that terrorist cells, such as Al-Qaeda, is constantly pursuing a nuclear capability. Whether that capability is acquisition or production is not necessarily certain, but the sources, as shown by the mishandling of HEU in some countries, are out there. Potential sources of nuclear weapons, like Russia and Pakistan, also present a concern due to their ample supply of tactical nuclear weapons which, by comparison of high yield bombs, have low security measures (Oppenheimer 2005,…
- 647 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The United States was the first country in the world to develop nuclear weapons, and is the only country to have used them in warfare, with the separate bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in World War II. Before and during the Cold War it conducted over a thousand nuclear tests and developed many long-range weapon delivery systems.[3] It maintains an arsenal of 5,113 warheads[1][2] and facilities for their construction and design, though many of the Cold War facilities have since been deactivated and are sites for environmental remediation.…
- 4054 Words
- 17 Pages
Good Essays -
Mr. Richard Turco, an atmospheric scientist, claims that: “detonating between 50 and 100 [nuclear] bombs - just 0.03% of the world 's arsenal - would throw enough soot into the atmosphere to create climactic anomalies unprecedented in human history” (Jhan. par. 3). At this moment it is believed that Pakistan and North Korea have close to 130 warheads of mass destruction under their possession. The detonation of their weapons alone would be enough, to make Mr. Turco’s discoveries a reality. Therefore disarming these two countries is definitely a priority, mostly because both governments are very unstable, and in the case of North Korea it is not a secret that they have attempted plans against the safety of the entire humanity with such arsenals, but even though the United Nations, and the IAEA are doing everything in their power to stop Pakistan and North Korea from manufacturing and initiating a nuclear war by condemning both countries to pay gigantic sanctions, both countries have continued to create such weapons.…
- 1172 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays