Athletes Shouldn’t Get Paid
58% of college coaches think that there athletes should get paid for playing sports at the college level. Even though they are marketing athletes on merchandise, athletes should not get paid because they are student’s first and athletes second. Colleges don’t have a huge budget for paying athletes and the students are required to go to school. The students are at the age where they won’t budget the money and they will waste all of it. They are already be taken care of by the program by using the equipment, facilities for whatever sport they play , get the spotlight on them, people look up to them, and they still want money. Even though schools have money, they would need a better budget to pay every athlete that plays a sport. What would happen to the other schools that didn’t have a budget like the top ones? “Colleges have to pay every student athlete that attends the college and they would lose money. This means they would have to set salary caps for everyone” (Caplan). Setting salary caps would limit how much you could give each player and limit the amount that the college gets to pay the athlete. It would be a good way to pay athletes, but hard to pay every athlete on the roster. Also, you wouldn’t be able to keep track of paying every athlete different amounts of money based on how they played. “Not all NCAA teams are as profitable as others” (Lewis, 2010). An example would be big schools like Arizona State University, Florida, and Texas they have enough money in there budget to have a higher salary cap. Smaller teams like Western Michigan and Highlands won’t have a good enough salary cap to pay their athletes quality money. That would mean they would be getting paid less than the big schools just because they don’t have the money to pay their athletes or take care of them the way they want to. “You cannot give every player a full ride scholarship. There is just not enough money” ("Why paying college," 2011). This is the...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document