Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Should Animal Testing Be Banned?

Good Essays
1005 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Should Animal Testing Be Banned?
Should Animal Testing be Banned?

Throughout history, animal experimentation has played an important role in leading to new discoveries and human benefits. However, what many people tend to forget are the great numbers of animal subjects that have suffered serious harm during the process of experimentation. Many people are believed to be ignorant or misunderstand the nature of the lives that animals actually live, and are unable to understand the actual laboratory procedures and techniques. Other than the philosophical questions that arise, moral questions are the main reason why many animal right activists want it banned in every country. I feel that to this day, there should be no good reason why any living things should be subjected to this cruel punishment and unwanted torture just for serving another being’s needs. Animal testing should be banned under some circumstances; we can improve the situation by using alternative ways such as replacement, reduction, and refinement according to International Society from Applied Ethology.
Such movements like gaining rights for the oppressed, expressions of antiwar opinions in the U.S.A, and the women’s liberation movement, accompanied the movement for the ending animal experimentation. The animal rights movement has grown more and more complicated through its use of strategy and has successfully brought the issue of laboratory research to the eyes of the public. All forms of media, magazines, radio, television, newspapers, have increased their exposure of animal right protests over the last several years while giving room for groups to produce their own publications. In these publications, activists constantly make the analogy between the work of abolitionists before the emancipation and the efforts of animal right activists. This analogy of racism and “speciesism” was brought about by a philosopher named Richard Ryder in 1985 and brings up the issue of research with animal subjects to be emotionally unpredictable for many people.

Here are some facts that we should all be told. One of the biggest problems and the main reason why animal experimentation should be banned is the large percentage of birth defects that occur. The difference is that humans may also have a longer period of fetal development and be more sensitive to birth defects agents than other species. One example of another problem with animal experimentation are that animals can be given nicotine directly as opposed to being exposed to it as a human would for years. Another would be that stress caused by animal handling, whether it be because of lack food or water, may have adverse effects on pregnancy or its ability to mate with the opposite sex. Also these tests are too insensitive and tend to disregard learning or behavioural problems. Our plain existence can influence the behaviour of animals and disturb activities such as feeding, care- giving, and mating conduct. Besides, nine out of ten experimental drugs fail in clinical studies.

In 1986, a German law was passed and was known as the Animal Protection Act. This act forbade experimentation of tobacco products, washing powders, cosmetics, and the testing of weapons on animals. Soon after this law was passed in Germany, many countries started to adopt the law along with new laws such as the ban on LD50 test and the Draize eye irritancy test. LD50 is a lethal dose that painfully kills nearly 50 percent of the animals that it is injected into, and the Draize test which can cause blindness in rabbits. Rabbits are used for this test because they have large eyes and few tears ducts to wash away poison from their eyes. Places such as the England define each limit as to having a limit that should not be succeeded, and if done so would be a criminal offense. Every decade, animal experimentation could be looked at in a different light and activists will always be there to defend animal rights.
From the 1960’s to the early 1980’s, teens from eleven to seventeen tried to impress judges of science- fair competitions with cruel live animal experiments. This is just one example of how animal experimentation exists everywhere when supervision is missing. It is also about how laws are not enforced to stop such heinous acts of abuse. The usual projects that the students did were, starving animals to death, blinding the animals, mammalian surgery, and the injection of lethal substances. Although, improvements have been made to convince schools to restrict animal testing, these improvements are not enough.

Federal laws do not exist. Thus there are no provisions in this area that ban dissection or mistreatment, and the National Association of Biology Teachers are not responsible. However, the amendment made in 1985 to the Animal Welfare Act required a group committee to review how the uses of animals were to be used in the some of the college courses at some but not all. We can improve the situation by replacement, reduction and refinement. Replacement means either that more sentient species should be replaced by less sentient ones, or that animals should not be used at all if the same research or related training can be achieved in other ways; reduction means keeping the number of animals to the minimum necessary to achieve the aims of the research, however, the investigator should not reduce the number to so few that the results become statistically invalid; the object of refinement is to reduce to an absolute minimum, the pain, distress or suffering imposed on every individual animal used.
Despite the fact that rats, mice and birds are excluded from the Animal Welfare Act; activist reform groups have just started their mission and are nowhere near the end. We should make every effort to study separate animals and to learn more about their abilities to feel their torture, psychologically and physically to understand their true feelings. Hopefully in the future, we will no longer have to depend on animals to give us results on safe products. We could also be the ones chained up and experimented on by a higher being in the near future.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    I am a seventh grade student at the amazing Warren Jr. High. One of the first reasons why we shouldn’t have animal testing is because animals are getting hurt or abused. Another reason why we shouldn’t have animal testing is drugs that pass animal tests are not necessarily safe on humans. The main idea of the essay is animal testing should be banned.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Animal testing, also known as animal experimentation, or in vivo testing, often uses non-human animals in experiments to test the safety of products and has been a topic of heated debate for decades. Although some research uses animals only for natural behaviors observation, F. Barbara Orlans claimed in her book, In the Name of Science: Issues in Responsible Animal Experimentation, that more than sixty percent of all animals used in animal testing suffer from experiment procedure or even get killed in biomedical research and product-safety testing. On the one hand, successful animal testing can lead to medical cures and treatments for human beings, on the other hand, opponents are doubting the reliability of animal…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Though animal testing should be banned from ever being practiced or used again, people still view it as a necessity despite all of the evidence against it. Animal testing requires inhumane, unsanitary, unsafe, or cruel conditions that if done to humans would be outlawed since they either reduce the quality of life or cause disease or death. Seeing that animals are living, breathing creatures that want to survive just as much as people do, assuming that test conditions are not good for human kind, then they are not good for any living creatures. Furthermore, they are inherently wrong by nature. Tolerating animal cruelty promotes the same insensitivity that allows cruelty to people, such as serial killers and the early incidents of animal torture.…

    • 139 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal experimentation is a highly controversial subject throughout the world and in the 20th century the public has become increasingly aware of the two sides to animal testing. The earliest dated animal testing can be traced back to 384-322 BCE and it is still a common practice to this day. There are a few disagreements that are highly debated about animal experimentation such as the importance of the testing for scientific and medical goals, the suffering of the animals, and the ethical principles that apply to animals. Both sides of animal experimentation have their reasons and facts for why animal testing is ethical or unethical, but it comes down to the amount of pain the animals suffers and if it is morally correct.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Exploratory Paper

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Animal Experimentation plays an important role in today’s medical and pharmaceutical advances, but many question the morality of such a use of animal life. Whether you argue that testing different products and drugs on animals is necessary or not, this has become an integral part of developing products. From that Tylenol you pop to get rid of your headache, to that perfect shade of pink lip gloss, animal testing is used in order to produce the simplest household items. Today, in the United States, it is federal law that requires all pharmaceuticals, food additives, cosmetics, and garden chemicals to undergo a series of tests, including animal testing, before being available to general public. It is estimated between fifty and a hundred million vertebrate animals worldwide are being used fro animal experiments. While many believe that animal experimentation is a crucial part of research and safety, others argue the morality of this issue. Another point of view some share is a mixture of both opposing views, where one believes that animal experimentation should only be condoned in the field of medical research but not for vanity reasons.…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Persuasive Paper

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages

    III. Credibility: According to Peta ’s fact sheet, they argue that ‘In many cases, animal studies do not just hurt animals and waste money, they kill people too.’” IV. Thesis: In American society many groups and organizations…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Do you want to see animals abused and killed sometimes for nothing? Animal testing is flawed and can produce very unreliable results. Around 26 million animals are used every year for scientific and commercial testing. These animals are used to determine the toxicity and effectiveness of medications before they test it on humans. Therefore animal testing should be banned.…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The practice of experimenting on animals has always been controversial. In pursuit of scientific knowledge, animal testing is essential, but as the word testing implies, such experiments are often harmful or ineffective. Over the decades scientists have had to choose whether to put morals over advancements, ultimately determining the fate of countless animals.…

    • 1432 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Animal Testing Is Wrong 1

    • 2184 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Tannenbaum, Jerrold, and Andrew N. Rowan. "Rethinking the Morality of Animal Research." Hastings Center Report. 1. (1985): 32-43. Print.…

    • 2184 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing Outline

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Today, I will first discuss the cruel injustice of animals during history, then discuss the major ways of how research on animals is wrong, and finally persist on the solutions to animal testing by announcing the different alternatives.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The primary reason why animal testing should cease to exist is because it is inhumane to strip a helpless animal of its rights for the benefit of experimentation and research. "Animals have a basic moral right to respectful treatment . . .. This inherent value is not respected when animals are reduced to being mere tools in a scientific experiment.” (Lonestar) While animals cannot express themselves as humans can, they can feel, think, behave, and experience pain. Their inability to express themselves should not be taken advantage of.…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Animal Testing should be banned due to its cruelness, moral issues and the existence of effective alternative methods.…

    • 2162 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing Is Wrong

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In American society, many groups and organizations are debating whether or not animal testing should be banned. Some people believe that there are reasons why animal testing should be done. Others believe that animal testing is morally wrong. Some experts believe that there are other options available. I believe that animal testing is wrong based on three observations: animal testing is unethical, pointless, and abusive.…

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout history, animal testing has been used for a variety of research and tests, but we never stop to realize the cruelty and inhumanity of their environments. Gandhi once said, “The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated” (qtd. in Hajar). Animal testing is unnecessary and irrational because we have the technology to replace the inhumane testing, which proves to be even more accurate and precise with its results as well. With new technologies such as cell cultures, human tissues, and in vitro tests, we are able to replace some of the tests that cause harm and discomfort to those animals.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is Animal Testing a Crime?

    • 1910 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Should animal testing be banned? Slavery, murder, and rape are considered among the worst crimes imaginable, however thousands of innocent animals die every day in labarotories, why? Throughout the centuries, scientists have searched are 74% Say Yes and 26% Say No for animal testing be banned. To treat and prevent disease in humans. Every new discovery must be tested to prove its reliability, because experimental results vary according to with the circumstances and the physiology of the animals used. Since animals are the closest living organisms to human beings, scientists have traditionally tested their new products on animals. However, over time better methods, which do not involve animal suffering, are available. Nevertheless, the debate continues between supporters of animal research, who believe that animal research is vital to medicine, and opponents, who are convinced that animal research is wasteful. The main argument to justify the inhumane use of animals is that evolution has placed humans on top, so it is natural for us to use other creatures. In response to this simplistic argument, one animal advocate declares: "Killing and using animals is an integral part of the evolution of human beings. Not killing and not using animals is the next step in our evolution". In other words, the fact that humans have used animals does not imply that we should continue to do so. Every day of a year, thousands of fully conscious animals are scalded, beaten or crushed to death, and more are subjected to horrible surgery and then allowed to die slowly and in agony. Is this morally correct? "No", says Ingrid Newkirk of PETA,"When it comes to feeling pain, a rat is a pig is a dog is a boy".In vitro studies with human cells and serum have permitted scientists to identify the AIDS virus and determine its effect, whereas, on the other side, the usage of thousands of animals for AIDS research have led to few useful results. Moreover, in some cases, animal…

    • 1910 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics