Service to Improve Healthcare in Rural Areas
Teleconsultation service to improve healthcare in rural areas: acceptance, organizational impact and appropriateness
-------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------
Abstract
Background
Nowadays, new organisational strategies should be indentified to improve primary care and its link with secondary care in terms of efficacy and timeliness of interventions thus preventing unnecessary hospital accesses and costs saving for the health system. The purpose of this study is to assess the effects of the use of teleconsultation by general practitioners in rural areas.
Methods
General practitioners were provided with a teleconsultation service from 2006 to 2008 to obtain a second opinion for cardiac, dermatological and diabetic problems. Access, acceptance, organisational impact, effectiveness and economics data were collected. Clinical and access data were systematically entered in a database while acceptance and organisational data were evaluated through ad hoc questionnaires.
Results
There were 957 teleconsultation contacts which resulted in access to health care services for 812 symptomatic patients living in 30 rural communities. Through the teleconsultation service, 48 general practitioners improved the appropriateness of primary care and the integration with secondary care. In fact, the level of concordance between intentions and consultations for cardiac problems was equal to 9%, in 86% of the cases the service entailed a saving of resources and in 5% of the cases, it improved the timeliness. 95% of the GPs considered the overall quality positively. For a future routine use of this service, trust in specialists, duration and workload of teleconsultations and reimbursement should be taken into account.
Conclusions
Managerial and policy implications emerged mainly related to the support to GPs in the provision of high quality primary care and
-------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------
Abstract
Background
Nowadays, new organisational strategies should be indentified to improve primary care and its link with secondary care in terms of efficacy and timeliness of interventions thus preventing unnecessary hospital accesses and costs saving for the health system. The purpose of this study is to assess the effects of the use of teleconsultation by general practitioners in rural areas.
Methods
General practitioners were provided with a teleconsultation service from 2006 to 2008 to obtain a second opinion for cardiac, dermatological and diabetic problems. Access, acceptance, organisational impact, effectiveness and economics data were collected. Clinical and access data were systematically entered in a database while acceptance and organisational data were evaluated through ad hoc questionnaires.
Results
There were 957 teleconsultation contacts which resulted in access to health care services for 812 symptomatic patients living in 30 rural communities. Through the teleconsultation service, 48 general practitioners improved the appropriateness of primary care and the integration with secondary care. In fact, the level of concordance between intentions and consultations for cardiac problems was equal to 9%, in 86% of the cases the service entailed a saving of resources and in 5% of the cases, it improved the timeliness. 95% of the GPs considered the overall quality positively. For a future routine use of this service, trust in specialists, duration and workload of teleconsultations and reimbursement should be taken into account.
Conclusions
Managerial and policy implications emerged mainly related to the support to GPs in the provision of high quality primary care and
References: BMJ 2000, 320(7231):354-357. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text |PubMed Central Full Text 3 BMJ 1996, 312(7042):1340-1344. PubMed Abstract | PubMed Central Full Text 7 Lancet 2002, 359(9322):1961-1968. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 18 BMJ 2007, 334(7600):942-950. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text |PubMed Central Full Text 19 BMJ 2002, 324(7351):1434-1437. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text |PubMed Central Full Text 28 BMJ 2003, 327(7406):84. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text 29