Since the middle ages until the 18th centuri, religious ideology was the most accepted way of explaining the unexplained. During the next couple hundred years, many members of academia(a school of philosophy), using science to back them up, came up with new ways of dealing with the unanswerable questions. When the church had the greatest power, men and women of science were viewed as the "wicked guys." In most cases it was safer to believe in the church and their ideas, in order not to be excommunicated or shunned by society, than to place their trust in charlatan scientists. As a result, many conflicts arise between men of religion and men of science.
Even if a scientist set out to prove the church wrong and show some very strong evidence contrary to popular belief, he was usually shunned and his ideas denounced publicly. It is not until many people have similar evidence and findings do they gain any credibility with normal people and the church. Nowadays people believe that if a scientific view is false, then by continuing study and research the truth may be discovered. one may conclude that if no one presented new ideas, then intelligent thought would have no place in a society like that.
Scientists like Darwin accepted the risks involved in presenting new ideas. Voltaire also was a revolutionary thinker. Although, he presented ideas of his own, he decided to satirize... [continues]
Cite This Essay
(1999, 10). Science vs Religion. StudyMode.com. Retrieved 10, 1999, from http://www.studymode.com/essays/Science-Vs-Religion-15132.html
"Science vs Religion" StudyMode.com. 10 1999. 10 1999 <http://www.studymode.com/essays/Science-Vs-Religion-15132.html>.
"Science vs Religion." StudyMode.com. 10, 1999. Accessed 10, 1999. http://www.studymode.com/essays/Science-Vs-Religion-15132.html.