Preview

Science and Religion

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
823 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Science and Religion
Assess the view that science has replaced religion as the main ideological influence in society today? (33 marks)

It will be important to assess the view that science has replaced religion as the main ideological influences in society today.
The enlightenment project could be seen as the start of the debate between religion and science as the main ideological influence in society today. As moments in the 16th century had lead to the first real questions of religion being asked. As the contribution of natural sciences such as Biology, Chemistry and Physics grew it lead to more doubts about religion. As Da Vinci acts can be seen as an example of this, he had stolen bodies from graveyards and drew the inside of them which was as ethically wrong but beneficial in helping scientist asses the human body. Leading to people questioning the amount religion had done for society. Therefore showing science has replaced religion as the main influence in society today.
As one sociologist Popper argues that science is a open belief system where every scientist’s theory can be falsified, as science can be open to criticism and tested by others. For example if scientist argues water boils at 100 degrees Celsius this can be tested (falsified). However with religion this is impossible as you are unable to test religious ideas on what happens after death. This leads to religion not being falsified and science ruled by the theory of falsification. Thus leading to Popper to believe science has been successful in explaining and controlling the world becoming the main ideological influence in society today.
As Kuhn argues Religion consist on too many paradigms, as he believes there should be one dominate paradigm such as Science. As in religion you have many different religious such as Christianity, Islam and Judaism making it difficult to have one dominate paradigm. While science has one dominate paradigm. As Kuhn accepts that paradigms can change for example it was believed

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Moral Arc Summary

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In Dr. Michael Shermer's most recent book, The Moral Arc: How Science and Reason Lead Humanity toward Truth, Justice, and Freedom, he guarantees that we are living in the most good time of our species' history. It is a book about good advance that exhibits through broad information and brave stories that the circular segment of the ethical universe twists toward truth, equity, and opportunity. Of the many variables that have met up throughout the hundreds of years to twist the circular segment in a more good heading, science and reason are principal. The Scientific Revolution drove by Copernicus, Galileo, and Newton was so world-changing that masterminds in different fields intentionally went for upsetting the social, political, and financial…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    An ideology is most commonly regarded as a set of ideas and values shared by a social group. Some people, for example Inclusivists, believe that there is little difference between scientific theories, religious doctrines and political ideologies. This is because an Inclusivist’s definition of religion is very broad. Anything which binds societies together or if groups have shared norms and values, it is considered a religion. This shows there is little difference between the concepts as it can be argued that all 3 bring societies or groups together due to shared norms and values. There are basic differences between the view of science and religion. The view of science is objective. Science believes in experiment and observation and teaches its followers that nothing is to be believed until scientific fact and evidence has been provided. Religion, on the other hand, teaches its followers to have faith in religious doctrines despite them having no evidence and is a very subjective concept. However there are similarities between all three concepts, as they are all socially constructed and they all help to make sense of the world. Another thing they all have in common is that there are certain groups/individuals that will benefit more than others. For example, from a Marxist perspective, the bourgeoisie (the ruling class) will benefit more from the capitalist system as they exploit the proletariat (the working class) by giving them a false consciousness. It could also be argued that people with higher power in politics benefit more from the ideologies as their opinions and ideas are more significant and have much more of an impact in society. Religious doctrines also provide authority figures such as priests and it can be argued that they benefit more from religion than others as, as well as gaining…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The article claims that by nature, it is impossible for science and religion to conflict primarily because their individual concerns are entirely distinct. This, however, brings about the debate of the role of both religion and science in our society. Religion I mainly faith based and is illogical, that does not require evidence. Science, on the other hand, is logical and is purely based on actual evidence. Many have criticized this idea on nonoverlapping magisteria claiming it holds no basis. For instance, given that both science and religion has different stories on how the earth came to exist, are they both teaching different domains? The debate lies on whether or not science and religion can co-exist without overlapping or…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    HPS326 Assignment Questionnaire Questions 1-5 (8% per question) 1. William Whewell coined the term “scientist” in the year 1833. 2. The conflict myth was proposed by John Draper and Andrew Dickson on the relationship between science and religion. They termed the relationship as a mutual antagonism whose history was a conflict between the rationality of science opposed by the ignorance of religion. Two versions of this myth exist; the strong and the weak. The strong version states that the inherent differences of science and religion have eclipsed through history as science is represented with a need to rival against religion, making conflict unavoidable. The weak version claims this conflict is haphazard and is purely based on historical fact. 3. The historiographical distinction between 'modern science' and 'natural philosophy' is that natural philosophy can be seen as a precursor of natural sciences (i.e physics etc.). Natural philosophy is an entity that can explain properties that can not necessarily be verified, classified or quantified. On the other hand, modern science is a development, divisional field of natural philosophy. It relies on the scientific experimentation for the growth of knowledge and advances in society and technology. 4. The 'Merton Thesis', proposed by Robert Merton, states that the rise of science is linked to the values of Puritanism. It verifies the idea's of Francis Bacon as being inspired by the puritan 'work ethic' which is accounted for by the volume of Puritans in the Royal Society. 5. According to Margaret Osler, in the 20th century, the conflict myth's support was attributable to; the positivism of Auguste Compte, and secularization of North American universities. In Compte's positivist philosophy, he founded numerous principles in which he claimed direct observation is the only way assertions can be established. This influenced numerous historians when they looked upon the history of science and religion as they rejected all…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sociologists argue that science and ideology can both be belief systems. In the 18th century was the era of the enlightenment. People started to think and question was there more than just a God and that’s where science was introduced. People started to use rational ways of thinking to explain things that happened. Science has been used to develop different parts in society such as medicine and technology that we use in everyday life. But it has also caused problems such as pollution and global warming. Science has cognitive power, it can allow us to explain, predict and control the world.…

    • 1795 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    God The Blible And Science

    • 2319 Words
    • 6 Pages

    There are many who believe that God and science are incompatible, but this is not so, William Lane Craig gives six examples in his article, “What is the Relationship between Science and Religion?” Such as, “Religion furnishes the conceptual framework in which science can flourish” (Craig) in other words it was because of religion, Christianity that birthed science. Second, “Science can both falsify and verify claims of religion. When religions make claims about the natural world, they intersect the domain of science and are, in effect, making predictions which scientific investigation can either verify or falsify” (Craig) Craig gives examples such as, the Greek and Indian religions that believed that the sky laid on Atlantis and that the earth rested on the back of a giant turtle, science disproved these; while science verifies that the Bible says that God created the earth and that nothing existed before then, John Barrow and Frank Tipler were able to discover that there was a creation out of nothing. Also, “Science encounters metaphysical problems which religion can help to solve” (Craig) like why do things exist, and how does one know they love? Now, “Religion can help to adjudicate between scientific theories” (Craig) and an example Craig gave was of the Special Theory of Relativity, Einstein believed that there was no “now” in time, but that every moment existed at the same time, but H.A. Lorentz believed that there is an absolute “now”, but because of motion effecting the means of measuring one cannot be completely sure which events are happening right now.…

    • 2319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The relationship between religion and science has always been complicated, with many scholars having very separate ideas. There are three ways to look at this relationship; Some scholars and religious groups, such as ultra Darwinist Richard Dawkins and literalist Christians believe in what has come to be known as the conflict model, when one believes that one dominates the other. The convergence model argues that science and religion work together harmoniously, the distinct model argues that science and religion shouldn't be mixed.…

    • 1576 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both science and religion try to answer the same questions that life offers us, yet both go about answering these questions different ways. Part of what makes us human is our curiosity and constant questioning of life, and religious and scientific explanations for life’s biggest questions have been up for debate for millennia. Science and religion differ in numerous ways from one another when trying to solve the mysteries of our world. On one side, science is the ever changing source of knowledge that uses physical evidence, logic, and research to answer questions, but there is no definite answer. Unlike science, religion only offers claims based around faith and belief to answer these questions, research and evidence are replaced with gods and the supernatural, which produce simple answers to complex questions. An example would be the creation of the universe, was it created by the “big bang”, or was there some godly being who has always been here that decided to make our world. One method offers explanations through research and evidence, the other offers single answers that require blind faith.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Throughout history we can find many instances where religion was strongly opposed to scientific research. For example, the Catholic Church’s objection to Galileo’s defense of Copernicus’ heliocentric model where he offered his observations that he felt furthered the theory that the planets revolved around the Sun. At that time, the belief that the Holy Scriptures were perhaps inaccurate was one thing, but attempting to confirm it as Galileo tried to do was a completely different issue and resulted in Galileo being forbidden by the Church to write or teach his findings. Another example is the opposition to Darwin’s theory of evolution by the majority of the Christians in America. 51% of those polled in 2005 by CBS believe God created humans exactly as they are today and reject evolution despite the evidence to the contrary. Even well-known scientists such as astronomer Allan Sandage stated his belief in creationism when he said "I find it quite improbable that such order came out of chaos. There has to be some organizing principle. God to me is a mystery but is the explanation for the miracle of existence, why there is something instead of nothing." (Willford)…

    • 6974 Words
    • 28 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Is Science a Religion?

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Thomas Kuhn thinks that scientific paradigms are essentially pictures of the world that are consistent with observations and logically coherent. But such pictures are necessarily always incomplete, at least until such time as we know everything, and our minds seem to struggle to accept this; it seems like there is an aesthetic compulsion to create harmonious images, even if that means filling in the spaces with metaphysical constructs. Andrew Brown states that the dictionary is wrong; science can be a religion too. He explains that if you strictly use the dictionary definition of science then it cannot be considered a religion, but if you look at science objectively you can see how it could be considered one. He makes a strong argument that religion has too many definitions for science to not be considered one.…

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Science vs. Ethics

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages

    ‘The more science advances, the more religion will decline.’ To what extent do you agree? (2008)…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Goals of Linguistic

    • 2231 Words
    • 9 Pages

    * The extra-scientific members of a social community – be they politicians or citizens – have limited presuppositions of making a rational contribution to the discussion of the goals of a science, lacking both knowledge and experience of the nature and possibilities of scientific work and presuppositions for appreciating the spiritual side of objective knowledge (see below). On the basis of available evidence, it is safe to say that few of them can distinguish between scientific insight and technological “progress”.…

    • 2231 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Natural sciences, as interpreted from the name, are the most important and natural divisions of science, for example biology, chemistry and physics. These three are referred to as ’’the most important’’, due to the infinite discoveries that can be and have been found based on those three areas. What Popper wanted was to get rid of prejudices such as that scientific knowledge needs to be a ’’proven’’ knowledge. This statement was made, because in reality, you cannot disprove nor prove a natural science theory, because they are all very abstract assumptions, and assumptions can often appear to be wrong. A scientific theory, is solely a set of hypotheses, which are recognized as long as its not a forgery. There must always be ways to refute the theory, and to maintain a critical distance in relation to the theory, because thats the only way to progress in science. As long as a theory is disproved, it may be referred to as ’’confirmed’’, but not proven. The objective of science is initially the truth, but it may be, that whilst finding the truth, the scientist does not know himself that he has found the truth. Popper’s own inquiries and curiosities created his own ’’theory’’ in a way, which was that ’’We cannot prove anything in science but we can disprove.’’…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Religion and Science

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “Religion is science and science is religion” this is my rule and belief in this life. However, not all religions agree with science all the time. In my point of view, if a religion does not agree with science at all then it can’t be a true religion, because if GOD created everything and everything have its own science, therefor, the true religion from a true GOD should agree with the science that was created by GOD.…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In many aspects of life, science and religion are shown to disagree with each other; Science focuses on logic and reason while religion relies solely on faith and the belief of a higher power. Both have advantages as well as disadvantages. Some advantages and disadvantages of religion are that you obtain eternal life, spiritual support and guidance, and be a better person through morals and values. With these advantages come discrimination, confusion, and sin luring you away from God. The advantages of science are better technology, more advancements and inventions, but the disadvantages are it leads to sin, physical laziness, addiction, and misuse.…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays