Sati: A Sacred Practice or Immoral Act
Many cultures have different practices that seem unusual to other cultures. There is a raised debate in modern day Hinduism over the practice of sati, the self-immolation of a widow on her deceased husband’s grave. Many modern Hindu people view that there is no place for such a practice in society today and in the Hindu religion. Others however view that sati should remain in the religion because it has been a sacred historical part of Hinduism. Sati should be continue to be allowed as a strictly religious practice because the performance of this act represents the widow has fulfilled her dharma and devotion to her husband. Sati should be continued to be allowed as a religious practice in the modern Hindu religion. In the Hindu religion, the roles of genders are produced by a constructed system. The role of women in Hinduism is to serve her husband to the fullest. Upon the death of a woman, she is to either become a nun or continue to her life and never remarry. Women are not deemed fit for independence in the eyes of Hinduism. Through the practice of Sati by a widow, this is one of the only ways a woman can assert their freedom and self-worth in making a decision that they make independently best said by (Burgha 73-77). There may be a self-loathing to show of Although Sati has been a part of Hinduism since the Philosophical Era around the turn of the century, many view the practice should be outlawed. The world has become a different place than years ago as well as the way society perceives things. In present day, such a practice is deemed politically unacceptable because of the fact is a woman committing suicide regardless of the reason. The religious lenses have been removed as our world becomes a less and less religious oriented stated by (Mani 121-123). Many modern Hindu’s view this practice as immoral and a crime against women seen from the standpoint of society as a whole today. To perform the act of sati...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document