Preview

Sanofi Genzyme Merger

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4983 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Sanofi Genzyme Merger
(1) Brief Chronology 5/23/2010- Sanofi’s CEO Chris Viehbacher approaches Genzyme’s CEO Henri Termeer about an acquisition. Termeer expresses interest but wishes to discuss the possible deal after the company’s shareholder meeting in June. 6/28/2010- Viehbacher calls Termeer to set up a meeting and Termeer promises to respond soon. 7/2/2010- The media becomes alerted about Sanofi wishing to purchase a U.S. biotech company as rumors circulate about Genzyme. 7/29/2010- Sanofi sends a private letter to Genzyme’s board of directors offering $69/share in cash. 8/22/2010- Genzyme rejects Sanofi’s offer. 8/29/2010- Sanofi goes public with its offer of $69/share. 8/30/2010- Genzyme publicly rejects Sanofi’s offer once again. 10/4/2010- Sanofi goes hostile and begins to directly solicit to Genzyme shareholders maintaining the $69/share value. The offer is to expire on December 10, 2010. 12/10/2010- Sanofi’s tender offer is a failure for only 0.9% of Genzyme shareholders tendering their shares at the $69 offer price. Sanofi decides to extend its tender offer of $69 until January 21, 2011. 1/24/2911- Sanofi extends its tender offer again until February 15th 2/15/2011- Sources claim that Sanofi has agreed in principle to buy Genzyme for $19.2 billion in cash plus a CVR. This is a value of $74/share and as much as $5/share more if a drug or development sells well in the future. Shares of Genzyme jumped to 3.5%. 2/16/2011- Sanofi-Aventis agrees to pay $20.1 billion for Genzyme plus the conditional performance fees. 4/7/2011- Tender offer expires at the new price and Sanofi-Aventis has ownership of over 90% of Genzyme’s outstanding shares. 237,312,826 shares of Genzyme common stock were validly tendered. 4/8/2011- Sanofi publicly announces the successful acquisition of Genzyme corporation. 7/29/2011 Sales grow up to 6.9% as a result of the Genzyme acquisition.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Scm421merckcasereport 2

    • 790 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The initial decision Merck must make is whether to purchase the drug rights of the KL-798 product. It will initially cost $30 million up front and an additional $5 million to complete phase one. Disregarding Mr. Merck’s philosophy, the program suggests to not invest in drug rights due to an overall loss of $260,000.…

    • 790 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    (b) Common stock, $.0006 par value; 2,100,000,000 shares authorized; issued and outstanding 932,246,614 and 669.182,785 shares at February 2, 2013 and 922,126,579 shares and 695,743,547 shares at January 28, 2012, respectively.…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    On April 6, 2011, GNC completed an initial public offering (the "IPO") pursuant to which 25.875 million shares of Class A common stock were sold at a price of $16.00 per share. Holdings issued…

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The team viewed the video “Cost of Capital” as part of our weekly team discussion. In the video, Amil Singh discussed the cost of capital for Pfizer Inc. Pfizer Inc. is the world 's largest research-based pharmaceutical company that develops its own products in America. Pfizer revenue is about $65 billion with market gap close to $140 billion (John Wiley and Sons, 2012). The cost of capital is the "rate of return that capital could expect to earn in an alternative investment of equivalent risk" (Investopedia LLC, 2015). When the company researches and develops a new product it can take nearly eight to ten years before it hits the market and see a profit. In this paper, we will look at how Pfizer addresses its cost of capital and issues with research and development.…

    • 865 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Specific aspects of the Healthcare Reform Act also posed serious threat to Genentech 's business model. The passage of the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act allowed for a shortened approval pathway for biogeneric drugs, which would have a significant impact on Genentech, because of the significant costs associated with product development and testing in the industry.…

    • 1095 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Acc 556 Assignment 2

    • 4988 Words
    • 12 Pages

    At the end of 2013, a merger was announced between Biomet and Zimmer Holdings. It was a success and the new company, in a bid, acquired Biomet for a fee of $13.4 billion. But in October 2014, EU antitrust regulators opened an investigation into Zimmer’s bid on the grounds thinking that the deal may lead to substantial decreases in competition in certain markets. The verdict of the investigation into the deal that would make Zimmer the…

    • 4988 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Economics and True False

    • 7499 Words
    • 30 Pages

    As shown in Exhibit 8-3, in order to maximise its profit, what price should GeneTech charge for it’s vaccine?…

    • 7499 Words
    • 30 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Geron the first company to get the green light for trials, quit and is selling that part of the business…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As I have read the case it was presented that in January of 1990, Burroughs Wellcome executives were under continued pressure to reduce the price of Retrovir, a drug which had been found to be effective in the treatment of acquired immune deficiency syndrom (AIDS) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). After careful review of the data and the case I have come up with the recommendation for the company to maintain the current price of Retrovir.…

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    research paper

    • 2528 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Issued 6,000 shares of preferred stock to Thevenot Corporation for the following assets: equipment with…

    • 2528 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After this investment, there will be 10 million shares outstanding, with a price of $0.50 per share, so the post-money valuation is $5 million.…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Merck & Co

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Using the decision tree with the cash flows and the probability of each scenario, we calculated the expected net value of this drug license to be $13.98 million at year 2000 (Appendix 1). In addition, Merck’s patents on its current drugs will soon…

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Question 1 ma

    • 380 Words
    • 1 Page

    In March 1999, LVMH made a 100% takeover bid to the Gucci Group. The offer was $ 81 per share for all shares, including the ones recently issued to PPR, or $ 85 per share for all if the newly issued shares to PPR were rescinded. This proposal can be interpreted as a sign of high interest of the acquirer in Gucci. Most likely, LVMH believed the target company was quite undervalued and the synergies between the two companies would be fairly significant. The reason behind the structure of the deal (higher price if PPR’s shares were rescinded) was the dilution suffered by LVMH from the entrance of PPR group in Gucci. If the acquirer could undo the deal, they would not have seen its position diluted in the target company. Hence, it is advantageous for them to…

    • 380 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Merck Case

    • 587 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Merck had a 14% increase in sales between 1997 and 1998 and 22% increase in sales from 1998 – 1999, and a 13% annual increase in earnings over the same period. Merck’s business strategy consists of two parts: (1) developing and marketing new drugs through internal research, and (2) developing partnerships with smaller biotechnology companies. Since 1995, Merck had launched 15 new products that earned $5.9 billion on sales of $32.7 billion. Furthermore, Merck may agree to license new drugs from other firms and with its larger capital and greater assets, can assume the risk of submitting the drug through various regulatory approval phases. If the drug becomes profitable, Merck can earn significant cash flows while paying a royalty to the licensor. However, most important is the option that Merck has in deciding when to abandon or continue on this project (deferability or optionality). If Merck reaches a point when its expected NPV is negative, it can simply abandon the project. As a licensee, Merck can allow smaller biotechnology firms to focus on research and development. These smaller firms often have smaller budgets and are not financially or personnel equipped to handle the costly and long FDA approval process, and the subsequent marketing, distribution, and sales of new drugs. This task is better suited for a larger company, such as Merck, which has more resources and money.…

    • 587 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Club Med Case Study

    • 1607 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Since the beginning of 2014, a real battle is going on between 2 major competitors in order to acquire Club Med : Andrea Bonomi on one side and Fosun on the other side. The first bid was made by the association of companies owned by Fosun at the beginning of…

    • 1607 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays