Preview

Samsun vs. Apple

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
333 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Samsun vs. Apple
Grace Havran
10/08/2012
Article #3

Samsung v. Apple As many remember, back in the early spring of 2012, Apple and Samsung went to a patent war with release of the Samsung’s Android mobile devices and tablets for their products looking too similar to Apple’s style, user interface, patents, and trademarks such as the rectangular boxes in which the apps appear on the main screen. And this began the many lawsuits that would spring up between the two competing electronic companies. In the end, Apple won their initial lawsuit against for patents infringement and was awarded one billion dollars. While most Samsung would be disgruntled about the loss, they also thought the feud has been solved, but recent developments show that the war has only begun. As soon as the iPhone was released, Samsung went to work tearing it apart and now claims that it “infringes on two of its standard patents and six feature patents”. Papers were filed and submitted on October 1, 2012 to the U.S. District Court of Northern California for review. Samsung is appealing to the court’s decision on the basis of that the jury was too fast in their decision by only taking one day for the verdict. The court date for the hearing is set for some time in 2014 and will come before the same judge as the first case between Apple and Samsung. If Samsung wins this case they may recoup some of their losses in the previous lawsuit, but this leaves many wondering if this is the beginning of a never ending battle between Apple and Samsung, as well as other major electronic companies who just want to sell their products.

Works Cited
Ling, Frank. "Samsung Strikes Back: Files Patent Infringement Lawsuit against Apple 's IPhone 5." Examiner.com. Clarity Digital Group LLC D/b/a, 2 Oct. 2012. Web. 08 Oct. 2012. <http://www.examiner.com/article/samsung-strikes-back-files-patent-infringement-lawsuit-against-apple-s-iphone-5>.



Cited: Ling, Frank. "Samsung Strikes Back: Files Patent Infringement Lawsuit against Apple 's IPhone 5." Examiner.com. Clarity Digital Group LLC D/b/a, 2 Oct. 2012. Web. 08 Oct. 2012. &lt;http://www.examiner.com/article/samsung-strikes-back-files-patent-infringement-lawsuit-against-apple-s-iphone-5&gt;.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    2. War with Competitors – Apple holds many patents on software and hardware that competitors imitate to bring products to market. With the complicated war between companies Samsung and Apple reaching the masses, people start to take sides and demonize Apple. Apple must learn walk the fine line of protecting it’s intellectual property without being seen as the big corporate entity that attacks every other company that tries to enter the market.…

    • 798 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    In week 8 of AMBA 640, we will be analyzing the Apple case located in chapter one of Management Information Systems: Business Driven MIS Inc from an information systems management perspective. Our analysis will look at some of the common tools used to analyze competitive intelligence such as Porter’s Five Forces Model, the three generic strategies for choosing a business focus and the value chain analysis. We will also discuss why and how data, information, business intelligence and knowledge are important to Apple. This analysis will also include how Apple identified areas where it achieved a competitive advantage using management information systems and why competitive advantages are temporary.…

    • 2606 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Earlier, Oracle sued Google for using Java in Android. Microsoft and Apple have both sued Motorola, a licensee of Android. Another licensee, HTC has had to pay huge royalties to Apple for a twin 4 patent infringement.…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Apple vs. Samsung

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages

    To conclude, in the market place, there are no enemies forever, but profit. Samsung and Apple did everything to enhance their position in the market place and to get the most profit. As a witness of their competition in market, I realized that consumers are the real…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Samsung and Apple Inc

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The similarity of Apple Inc. and Samsung products have led to what became known as the mobile device patent wars due to the extensive litigation in fierce competition in the market. Since these two companies are in the top 15 manufactures, (1st Apple 25.66% and 2nd Samsung 17.47%), the impact of competition between the two companies caused Apple to sue Samsung for one if its component suppliers. Then during autumn 2011, an Australian federal court granted Apple’s request for an injunction against Samsung’s Galaxy Tab. However, the junction Apple sought to block the Tab was denied by the Australian Court after Christmas.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Apple had accused Samsung of copying its intellectual property, including its very broad design patents for rectangular "electronic devices. And Apple wants to use those patents to stop its competitor from selling items like the new (rectangular) Galaxy tablet and (rectangular) Android-based Smartphone's.…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Apple vs. Samsung

    • 4633 Words
    • 19 Pages

    References: Guglielmo, C. 20122, The Apple vs. Samsung Patent Dispute: 20 Talking Points, Forbes, New York, Viewed 19 April 2013, Scottek, T.C. 2012, Apple vs. Samsung: complete coverage of tech’s biggest trial, The Verge, Little Indiana, Viewed 19 April 2013, Wall, M. 2012, Apple vs. Samsung: Case Overview for the Patent Trial of the Century, Brighthand, San Francisco, Viewed 19 April 2013, Lev-Ram, M. 2013, Apple v. Samsung: (Patent) trial of the century, Fortune, Viewed 21 April 2013, Daniels, L. 2013, Samsung Lawyer Assesses IP Legal Battle With Apple, Intellectual Property Watch, Geneva, Viewed 21 April 2013, Barret, M.P. 2012, Apple’s War on Android, Bloomberg Businessweek, New York, Viewed 25 April 2013, Wikipedia 2012, Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Viewed 26 April 2013, The Verge n.d., Live: Samsung’s closing arguments in Apple vs. Samsung, Vox Media, Little Indiana, Viewed 26 April 2013, Foresman, C. 2012, Apple awarded design patent for actual rounded tectangle, Ars Technica, Chicago, Viewed 28 April 2013, Clover, T. 2013, New Damages Trial in Apple v. Samsung Set for November, MacRomors, Glen Allen, Viewed 28 April 2013,…

    • 4633 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the past several years, there has seen a plethora of patent lawsuits within the smartphone industry. In the highly competitive environment, manufacturers of handsets have been aggressive in protecting their intellectual properties by suing competitors by claiming infringements on patents. For example, in March 2010, Apple sued HTC for allegedly infringing on 20 Apple patents (Weil, 2010). Apple also sued Nokia in 2010 for similar patent infringements("Patent wars", 2011). However, in April 2011 the International Trade Commission recommended that neither HTC or Nokia should be found liable for any infringements. Further Microsoft reached a licensing agreement in April 2010 with HTC to pay royalties on Android based handsets ("Patent wars", 2011). More recently, Apple launched a lawsuit against Samsung in April 2011 claiming Samsung copied design features of the iPhone in its Galaxy line of Android phones (Quigley, 2011). These are just a few examples of legal challenges faced by smartphone manufacturers. Mentioning all lawsuits in the past several years is beyond the scope of this analysis, but it is important to recognize that manufacturers are using their patent portfolio's to make it more difficult for their competitors to gain larger market shares. Even if the majority of cases are found to be 'dubious', the costs associated with legal battles can hamper or slow down the release of new handsets and hence making it more difficult for the manufacturer to stay competitive.…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    PESTEL analysis

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Over the past several years, there has seen a plethora of patent lawsuits within the smartphone industry. In the highlycompetitive environment, manufacturers of handsets have been aggressive in protecting their intellectual properties by suingcompetitors by claiming infringements on patents. For example, in March 2010, Apple sued HTC for allegedly infringing on20 Apple patents (Weil, 2010). Apple also sued Nokia in 2010 for similar patent infringements("Patent wars", 2011).However, in April 2011 the International Trade Commission recommended that neither HTC or Nokia should be found liablefor any infringements. Further Microsoft reached a licensing agreement in April 2010 with HTC to pay royalties on Androidbased handsets ("Patent wars", 2011). More recently, Apple launched a lawsuit against Samsung in April 2011 claimingSamsung copied design features of the iPhone in its Galaxy line of Android phones (Quigley, 2011). These are just a fewexamples of legal challenges faced by smartphone manufacturers. Mentioning all lawsuits in the past several years isbeyond the scope of this analysis, but it is important to recognize that manufacturers are using their patent portfolio's tomake it more difficult for their competitors to gain larger market shares. Even if the majority of cases are found to be'dubious', the costs associated with legal battles can hamper or slow down the release of new handsets and hence making itmore difficult for the manufacturer to stay competitive.…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Samsung Analysis

    • 6230 Words
    • 25 Pages

    Event: A US jury on Aug 24 handed Apple a sweeping victory over Samsung Electronics (SEC)—in stark contrast to an earlier split ruling by a Korean court. Impact: The verdict implies that the handset industry will now compete more fiercely in design, as well as in technology, eroding the profitability of handset makers and parts suppliers. On the positive side, the battles should help Apple and SEC further consolidate their leadership. The USD1.05b in suggested damages for SEC to pay equate to 5% of our 2012 operating profit projection for the firm. Looking ahead, sales (including those of Galaxy S3) should be burdened by the risk of similar verdicts, but we foresee limited impact on earnings, as such risk will be shared by all smartphone manufacturers. SEC will likely suffer in the short term, but the ruling should push it to revamp its corporate culture, brand, and investment strategy. We therefore remain bullish on SEC, expecting it to weather the storm.…

    • 6230 Words
    • 25 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    aspects in order to seize a business chance for sure and avoid risk factors as…

    • 1848 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    China's Smartphones

    • 3192 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Abstract The production of copycat phones manufactured in China has a massive impact on the sales of major smartphone players. This paper will evaluate whether products have intellectual property (IP) rights to protect their designs in China in comparison to Australia. There are IP rights to protect designs in China – the patent law for outward design. However, even with the existence of IP laws, applicants are not fully protected because of: the weak IP law enforcement; the corruption that exists within the political structure; and the legal history and culture in China. Introduction Smartphones have become an essential part of many lives in this day and age. Therefore, to cater to the demands of the public, companies like Apple and Samsung manufacture and produce different types and designs of smartphones to meet the needs of consumers. As smartphone sales increase, this creates many opportunities for copycat phones to enter the markets. These copycat phones look almost identical on the exterior but run on an operating system of inferior quality leading to secondrate product specifications. These copycat phones are mainly manufactured in China and sold at a cheaper price. The low price offered offsets the drawbacks of the copycat phones. As a result, major players in this industry face threats such as falling sales of genuine smartphones and lower market share. To ensure that the major players are not disadvantaged, China will have to bring the production of copycat phones to an end by imposing the law of intellectual property (IP) rights. This paper will evaluate whether products have intellectual property (IP) rights to protect their designs in China in comparison to Australia. The scope of the paper will be limited to the following: 1. The design IP rights laws in China. 2. The design IP rights laws in Australia. 3. The analysis of World Intellectual Property Organisation for design IP. 4. The analysis of World Trade Organisation for design IP.…

    • 3192 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bcg Matrix Apple

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Samsung's aggression has gotten it into trouble in the past, losing a high profile case to Apple for imitating its design. But the reputation hit and the fine were a small price to pay.…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    case study

    • 297 Words
    • 1 Page

    Samsung was a copycat brand from the time it started to around the 90s. Some of the first items they made were calculators and black and white TVs. In 1993 Samsung unveiled a new strategy that they called “New Management”. They made the decision not to be a cheap copycat brand anymore. Samsung cut ties with low end retailers like Kmart and Wal-Mart. They started distributing at stores like Circuit City and Best Buy. They started making innovated electronics and coming up with new ideas instead of just copying other brands. Today their goal is to keep coming up with new ideas.…

    • 297 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Samsung Strategy

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In Aug 2012, Samsung, the world 's largest technology company by sales, is ordered to pay $1.05 billion in damages for violating Apple’s patents for the iPhone and iPad, "Samsung 's strategy was to build something similar to another company 's product but to make it better, faster and at lower cost", is Samsung going to change its strategy to fit new conditions? Choe Sang-Hun 's article "After verdict, assessing the Samsung strategy in South Korea" is a roadmap to evaluating the effect of strategy on Samsung. This paper will also explore Samsung 's culture, responsiveness to external market environment and innovation…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics