Perspectives on Same-Sex Marriage
The purpose of having marriage as a legal institution is to encourage monogamy as the basis for stable personal lives and as one aspect of the family. Marriage is for people to find ways to live ordered and shared lives. It is intended to be the most stable possible unit of family life and a stable structure of intimacy. The word marriage is defined as, "The state of being united to a person in a consensual and contractual relationship recognized by law. It does not say only a man and woman. If changing the definition of marriage so that homosexuals can legally get married then I agree. Marriage has changed and evolved over the centuries and so should our laws about marriage. The key premises used in Nava and Dawidoff arguments regarding the legislation of same-sex marriage are that marriage is not conditioned on the intention or the capacity of children. Restrictions on the right to marry, therefore, affect both associational rights and a variety of entitlements. Gays and lesbians want to marry for the same reasons other Americans do. They want to gain the moral, legal, social and spiritual benefits granted to the marrying couple and especially for their family unit. Sokolowski argues the consequences of giving same-sex marriages full legal status. He believes that legalizing same-sex marriage will redefine the institution of marriage and open the door to other forms of marriage. The concept of same-sex marriage leads to impossibilities, because it contains a contradiction.
I think the civil rights of the minority in a democracy should be dependent on the support of the majority. Minorities should trust that the government will protect their rights and self-identity. If the minority is restrained it will eventually end up in an uprising and civil riots. Therefore, although the rights of the majority are significant the rights of the minority cannot be ignored. Balance must be reached in which the rights and freedoms of...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document