In the story The Interlopers, Saki writes about
two families that have been feuding for generations. He writes about how "interlopers"
stop them from rivaling, and eventually bring the two of them to be friends
only minutes before they are eaten by wolves. He does this by using dramatic
irony. Through the character's words he tells us what the two will do when
they get back to town now that they are friends. This leads you to believe
that the feud is over and everything is all right. The author then, however,
allows the characters to be eaten by wolves; contrary to the resolution that
could be concluded from the explanation and/or foreshadowing of the resolution.
Saki's purpose for writing this story was probably to get across the point
that you should not hold long grudges, especially without knowing the reason,
or it might be too late to apologize. His unorthodox style of writing however
does achieve his purpose. The characters in his story finally make-up, but
then they are eaten and do not have
the chance to tell their families of
the news. If you could continue the story, you would probably be able to assume
that then the families continued to feud.
The story All the Years of
Her Life by Morley Callaghan, on the other hand, contrasts greatly with The
Interlopers in this area. In the story All the Years of Her Life, Callaghan
writes about a young boy who works at a thrift store and is caught stealing
merchandise one day. By the young boy, Alfred, getting in trouble it affects
his mother; upsets and embarrasses her, and by watching his mother cry Alfred
matures. The story contrasts to The Interlopers because the author gives you
vivid clues to what will be the resolution and there are no tricks or twists.
Alfred is confronted by Mr. Carr, the store clerk, and is caught. Mr. Carr
then calls Alfred's mother, Mrs. Higgins, to stop by because Alfred is in trouble....
Please join StudyMode to read the full document