Safety Protocol or Abuse of Power?
The target audience for this subject is Transportation Security Administration (TSA) employees. This includes agents and the corporate branch. Readers are expected to have a general understanding of how air passengers feel while being searched and why some protocols should change. This report is also intended to educate employees on the seriousness of sexual harassment and give different ideas as to how to search passengers. Fire. Destruction. Horror. These are a few of the understated words that describe the tragedy of 9/11. On September 11th, 2001, terrorists hijacked planes, then crashed into the Twin Towers and the Pentagon, causing thousands of innocent lives to come to an unexpected end. “Haunting questions remain unanswered about the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks on the United States: How did the 19 hijackers elude detection to carry out their deadly plot? (Re-examining 9/11)” After this tragedy, the TSA made their security protocols twice as strict if not more. To some, these protocols are necessary. For others, that is not the case. The searches are very thorough, varying on the suspicion of the traveler. One can only guess some of the people whom the agents presume “suspicious”: people of Arabic descent, or people who look Arabic in general are searched very thoroughly. However, Arabic people are not the only ones offended by these situations: many Americans are also sickened by the TSA’s protocol. What makes a person look suspicious? Why are some people not searched as well as others? Should everyone be searched equally, and if so, how far should the TSA take the physical aspect of searching? A person’s social situation or cultural background does not coincide with insanity; everyone should be searched equally, and only those who are legitimately “suspicious” should be searched thoroughly after the basic searching is completed.
Some claim that the TSA take their protocol too far. Many people, the majority of them of...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document