Preview

Russian Revolution: Was Lenin a Hero Who Deserves to Be Worshipped and Respected Even Today or Was He Nothing More Than a Tyrant Who Should Be Buried and Forgotten?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
652 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Russian Revolution: Was Lenin a Hero Who Deserves to Be Worshipped and Respected Even Today or Was He Nothing More Than a Tyrant Who Should Be Buried and Forgotten?
May 2013 History Source-Based Essay Was Lenin a hero who deserves to be worshipped and respected even today or was he nothing more than a tyrant who should be buried and forgotten? Lenin was a true hero to Russia and deserves to be respected and admired today for his contribution to the country. Although there are many facts pointing the opposite way, saying that Lenin does not deserve the respect, there are so many positive moves that he has made into making Russia a better land. “it seemed as if one dictatorship, that of the Tsars, has simply been replaced by another, that of Lenin” (Source B) many people had this opinion but were drowned out by the millions who believed that he was a hero. He was portrayed as a hero, and marketed like one as well, which was understandable, as peoples’ confidence in him. He was one that looked “in control” and leader-like (Source A) “Do not build memorials to him, name places after him, do not hold magnificent celebrations in his memory. All of this meant so little to him.” (Source C) According to Lenin’s widow, Lenin was a true stalwart in the sense that he was humble and simple in his ways, yet smart and thoughtful in his actions. He looked at what he did for Russia as a service and not a favour. A letter from Lenin was sent to the Bolsheviks in 1918 with instructions to carry out a set of demands in “The interest of the entire revolution” in order “to set an example” (Source D) This list, instructing the public killing of 100 notorious kulaks, rich and bloodsuckers and the confiscation of their grain, execution of hostages and a confirmation back to Lenin after this plan was executed. This may have put him in a bad light, but did not retract from what he did for Russia and Russians.

In a poster Lenin is shown sweeping royalty, aristocrats, the church and the capitalists away while standing on the top of the world, (Source E) and this shows him to be a hard working, person with honest

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Over the period from 1855 to 1964, Russia saw various reforms and policies under the Tsars and the Communist leaders that had great impacts on its economy and society both positive and negative. Lenin definitely implanted polices that changed society and the economy for example with war communism. However whether his policies had the greatest impact is debatable and in this essay I will be assessing the view whether Lenin had the greatest impact on Russia’s economy and society than any other ruler between the period from 1855-1964.…

    • 2039 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Tsar had a lot of opponents within Russia and he did not deal with them to the best of his abilities. This meant he was not firmly in control of Russia at all. The 4 main opposing groups were: The Liberals (Cadets), The Social Revolutionaries (SRs) and The Social Democratic Party (Bolsheviks and the Mensheviks) Although the different groups were all angry at different things, the one thing they had in common was that they were all unhappy about Russia’s Social and Economic Situation. In my opinion the Bolsheviks were the most dangerous group towards Tsar and the…

    • 1597 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Axis Powers

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Lenin (the leader of the Bolsheviks) was very concerned that the brutal thug who had been very useful to the party when they were an underground, illegal organization, would prove to be a thuggish influence if given government office.…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As he went up in ranks in his Democratic party, he soon became the “secretary general of the Central Committee of the Communist Party, a role that embedded him to appoint his allies to government jobs and grow a base of political support”(C). When Lenin, the first leader, died, Stalin was placed into power, where he then became the absolute ruler of Russia. As a leader, he was fierce, a go getter. No matter what the cost, he did whatever he needed to do for the revolution and went to jail more than 18 times. However, he adapted a personality that was rude, sullen, and many other characteristics that cause people to push him away and or shun him, “He became more dedicated because of this isolation”(C).…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Vladimir Lenin was responsible for the Bolsheviks growing hold on power in the years 1917-1924. One reason for this was his ability to be a pragmatic leader. During the Russian Civil War of 1918-1921, Lenin created War Communism. War Communism steered Russia into the direction of military production and aimed to create a social equality. Private property and money were abolished and military service and work became compulsory. In order to fulfill rationing; food was requisitioned from the peasants but were given nothing in return. As of this, it led to the Bolsheviks becoming increasingly unpopular with the people and in 1921 Sailors of the Kronstadt threatened military action against the communists unless war communism was ended and democracy restored. Lenin abruptly responded and ordered the Red Army to go to the Kronstadt naval base and kill the sailors. 10,000 were killed. Despite having just killed off the opposition, Lenin took into account what the sailors had said and realized that war communism could not continue. As a result of this, the New Economic Policy was issued which embraced a limited form of capitalism. The NEP legalised private trade, replaced grain requisitioning with tax-in-kin and reintroduced money. Although Lenin had already compromised by reintroducing money in 1922, the money that was minted did not have the Romanov emblem and so the Russian…

    • 836 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the time, Stalin seemed like he was the greatest person on Earth. He made himself seem as if he was above everybody, both physically and mentally. After all of the revolts that were occurring in Russia, he just took over. He went into power right after Lenin had died and took his place, over Trotsky who also wanted to rule over Russia. Well he didn’t and we can’t change that. All we can do is remember Stalin and remember all of the things he did to make people support him and his cause to industrialize Russia.…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The purpose of this poster was to reinforce the sentiments of communism by representing Lenin as heroic figure who saved Russia.…

    • 159 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lenin was the “founder of the Russian communist party,” and also “founder of the organization known as Comintern” (Resis). Lenin created the Soviet Union, and he also pulled Russia out of World War One. After Lenin died, there was a power struggle in which Stalin came out on top and became the second person to lead the Soviet Union. Under Stalin, Russia became totalitarian. (Krstich, Madison.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Lenin's Brutality

    • 1671 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Yet most everyone can agree that his impact on Russia was very large, whether for better or for worse. Surprisingly, the place that he is considered as the biggest hero would be in Russia, where his body was preserved and on display in Moscow ever since his death. Many Russians often thought of Lenin as a father figure, even while the rest of the world considered him to be a villain. Back in 2011, there was talk that Russia would remove the body from where it lay in Red Square. This agrees with what a large number of the Russian population thinks, but some think that the body needs to remain where it is. One of these people, Walter Rogers, is a man who writes for the news organization Christian Science Monitor. He argues that “Interring Lenin beside his mother in St. Petersburg may paper over, but will not expunge the bloody Bolshevik past. Shakespeare reminds us that ‘the evil men do lives after them.’ Modern Russia would dishonor communism’s victims if Lenin’s corpse is smuggled out of town on a moonless night (Heilbrunn, 3).” This controversy over where Lenin’s body remains shows how many disagree about how Lenin should be remembered. And while Russia may be struggling to come to terms with who Lenin really was, the rest of the world seems to be more decisive. According to Ellie Zolfagharifard from the UK Daily Mail, a survey found “the opinions of almost 7,000…

    • 1671 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since the tsar, Lenin has taken the ‘throne’ and along with the Bolsheviks proceeded to turn Russia into a one-party state. It can be argued that Russia has remained almost unchanged in terms of government policies and its traditions this is shown by Lenin's oppressive policies such as censorship. Lenin was not born into power and this shows he is in fact not an "heir" to Russian tradition. Similarly he had as little time for democracy as the tsars had, and as heir to the Russian tradition had followed the oppressive system and provided the continuation of the absolutist tradition in Russian. The Kronstadt revolt (1921) was a clear proof of the absolutism of the Bolshevik control and it is seen that rather than changing- Lenin ultimately replaced one form of state authoritarianism with another.…

    • 936 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lenin represented the key principles of the Machiavellian idea. When the Communist government finally started to function properly, Lenin managed to be both loved and feared as the head of the new state. Furthermore, he also managed to be greatly admired by his followers, Lenin’s way of command has carried on even after his time: Fidel Castro’s ways of governing are said to be influenced by Lenin, and of course Lenin’s follower in the government of Russia, Joseph Stalin also ruled Russia as if it was still on the hand of Lenin. However, this became possible due to the influence of the commandments set by Machiavelli in The Prince.…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trotsky was important in organising and coordinating the actual take over Petrograd in November, but Lenin was even more important because he was a strong leader who guided the Central Committee of the Party and pushed to make the takeover happen. For example, he produced the April Theses, which gave the Bolsheviks clear goals and made them better focused and organized, which was vital if they were going to take over successfully. He also put together the slogan ‘Bread, Peace, Land, and All power to the Soviets!’ which was designed to appeal to a broad range of people and he gave speeches and led rallies to inspire people to join the party. This meant that the Bolsheviks grew in popularity because they were offering people what they wanted – in particular they were the only party who opposed the war and all the other parties were associated with the much-disliked Provisional Government, which seemed to be doing…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Depression and Fascism

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages

    * Lenin was a Marxist. He preached that private property should be abolished and that everything should be owned by everyone. He also believed that anybody making profit was abusing everybody else and that the Russian government supported a system that kept the huge majority of Russian people in misery and therefore it should be overthrown.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Take a moment and try to recreate what the 1930 Soviet Union, or Russia, would have been like. Focus on the laws and actions put in place by Joseph Stalin, leader of that time. Think about you and your families’ jobs and education and the conditions from before Stalin. Now, taking all of these into consideration, do you think of Stalin as a hero or a villain? No opinion is wrong, for there are multiple reasons for both, but one must know that Stalin had at least improved Russia. Thus, would make him a hero.…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Commanding Heights Essay

    • 7534 Words
    • 31 Pages

    Lenin’s hardcore Communist policies were a disaster in the USSR: Food production and industrial output virtually collapsed and the county started falling apart. He had to abandon the most extreme Communist practices early on because they just didn’t work in real life.…

    • 7534 Words
    • 31 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics