Preview

Russian Revolution

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1116 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Russian Revolution
Modern history essay-half yearly

Explain the reasons for the growth of revolutionary activity in Russia prior to WW1:

Prior to world war one, there was a definite increase of revolutionary activity in Russia. A majority of this activity began when Tsar Nicholas the II came into power as autocratic ruler of Russia in 1894. His position as absolute monarch began to enrage the Russian people as they became unhappy with the inequality of the Feudal system. The weak economy of Russia and the lack of Industrialisation agrarian did not help this factor, as the people were not seeing any improvements in the growth of Russia as an economy. The Tsar poor leadership and unpopularity was too a leading factor to the growth of revolutionary activity, especially after bloody Sunday, the people needed a strong leader and felt that the tsar was not one. The fact that the countries military was weak did not provide comfort to the people as it became hard for Russia to stand as one united nation.

The long-term inequality of the feudal system and the Tsars autocratic system of parliament was one of the contributing factors for growth of revolutionary activity in Russia prior to WW1. The feudal system placed all of the Russian population into distinct classes. Most Russians did not question the Tsars system of government, believing he was appointed to rule by god. However some people refused to accept this, wanting to get rid of the Tsar and make big changes to the Russian society. There was a vast comparison between the royalty and the working class. The royalty lived a fine life, as did the army and the upper class, working shorter hours and working hardly at all. However the peasants or the “urbanised workers” worked extremely long hours and were paid little, most often being ordered around by the upper classes. This resulted in restlessness in the lower classes, those making easy money, such as the capitalists, were doing little to improve the conditions of their

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Another factor that was responsible for the survival of the Tsarist rule was the reluctance of the Peasantry to support opposition. The Peasants were extremely uneducated and they didn’t understand how these policies could change their lives. The Tsar had been the political power since the 13th century so it was all that they knew. They believed that the Tsar was appointed by god so whatever he did, they believed it was for the best. They were fearful that if they joined an opposition group the Tsar would be able to ‘see’ them and…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Russian Revolution Causes

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages

    By 1917, Russia was chaotic, the government had been thoroughly corrupted, strikes were rampant and all happening at once. The World War I had begun and Russia was having many casualties due to being ill - equipped against industrialized Germany, and amidst the countries it was the one to receive most damage. Due to the german attacks the Russian economy had been falling apart, and such a situation was only useful to the radicals, as they used it as an opportunity to join with the moderates among other forces, in order to overthrow the Czar and achieve their revolutionary goals. As time passed Russia’s situation only deteriorated, demonstrators and protestants took over the streets, the king’s armies killed many of them, but they still continued to attack full force. Then when an army took the protestants side, the tables flipped, Nicholas II, the Czar at the time was forced to abdicate his throne and so freed Russia of over four centuries of Czarist…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bolshevik Revolution Dbq

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages

    What were the consequences of the Bolshevik Revolution and why does Hobsbawm call it the central event of the 20th century?…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Bolshevik Takeover

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The fall of the Provisional government and the Bolshevik Revolution sparked many changes for Russia in 1917. It changed Russia for always. The economic system changed from a capitalist system to a socialist economy, peasants were granted the land that they already took in the February/March revolution and it ended the war and made peace in Russia. The lead up to the revolution can be traced back as far as March during the February/March revolution of 1917.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nicholas II came into the throne with a mutual attitude as his grandfather, Alexander II. He listened to ministers who recognised the necessity of economic modernisation, but failed to see the potential degree of political change if implemented. Albeit, Tsar Nicholas II’s idea of Russia’s future was one of modernisation and economic development, however with the combination of the political system that still retained the traditional features of autocracy, it looked potentially slim. The Tsar failed to recognise and adapt to the social and economic changes that had taken place. Expressions such as the emancipation under the great reforms of 1860 that made peasants freer and more prosperous gave birth to various political groups, which could no longer tolerate the Tsar’s unquestionable autocratic obedience as acceptable. These social and economic changes were largely accountable for the great revolutionary outburst in 1905. The defiance wasn’t only coming from the side of peasants and the urban workforce in general, but also from the literate middleclass who could no longer stand the autocratic state, consequenting in the establishment of secret political groups and opposition to the Tsar Nicholas II such as social democrats, comprising of Bolsheviks, Mensheviks as well as Kadets and many other social revolutionaries. The…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Russia modernized extremely late, relative to other European countries, and this mid-modernizing period played a large role in the lead up the revolution. Up until then, Russia was still stuck in the social constructs set up in medieval times, such as the hierarchy triangle, in which the Royals were most important, then the Clergy, then the Army, then the Capitalists and finally the working class and peasants. Because of this system, the peasants were the lowest of the low, and although they made up the largest percentage of the population, they had the least rights and had no way of getting out of their social position. They felt the continual onslaught of political, social and economic grievances from the government, for example, up until the early 1880’s, they were not allowed to own land, and even when Tsar Alexander - Nicholas’ father - emancipated them and allowed them to own their own land, they were constantly crippled by taxes of crops and money. These poor living conditions were only magnified when peasants heard stories of the emancipation in other countries in Europe, which eventually resulted in a cry for peasant rights that was not answered fully until the revolution.…

    • 1626 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Revolutionaries had been active in Russia for many years, even assassinating the Tsar in 1881. Did the War help to make these pressures too much for Tsarism to bear?…

    • 2854 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Russian Revolution

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Russia went to war with Japan with the idea of taking parts of China and Korea under their rule. Specifically, the territories were Manchuria and Korea, and the war was formally known as the Russo-Japanese War. The Russians lost the war because of the distance the army had to travel and Japan and more industrialization. The Russian revolution of 1905 could have been avoided if Russian troops did not attack innocent strikers, if the timing for Bloody Sunday was better placed, and if Czar Nicholas II participated more in the protection of the revolution.…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Discuss the range of groups wanting change in Russia and the ways in which they went about this.…

    • 1352 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The actions of the tsar Nicholas prove to be an important factor for the breakout of revolution in 1917. In 1915 when the Tsar decided to take full control of the army he was creating even further inconveniences for himself. Due to the fact that the Tsars main attention was spent on the army, the day to day running of the government was left to his Tsarina Alexandra Feodorovna. The problem was created through the fact that the Tsarina was greatly influenced by Grigori Rasputin. Rasputin damaged the Tsars reputation as anybody who wanted to gain power would have to befriend Rasputin. Many governors and politicians either resigned or were relieved of their position due to Rasputin. This had a large effect on the Russian people as the Tsars attention was fully towards the war and not on the problems faced by the people. This would have been a growing source of discontent which backs up the argument that the Tsars neglect of the Russian troubles back in Russia would have been one of the main reasons for the outbreak of revolution in 1917.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In February 1917, all were stunned when what started off as a demonstration regarding shortages of food and fuel, escalated into a protest attempting to overthrow Tsar Nicholas II. However, nobody could have predicted what the result would have been, as when Tsar Nicholas II abdicated, there was nobody to assume the position of Tsar, and so 300 years of Romanov rule came to an end. Although it came as a surprise, the failure of the tsarist regime happened for a number of reasons. A largely significant factor was the Wars, and the effect they had both on the troops and the Home Front. The First World War in particular put a severe strain on not only the male agricultural labourers, as they were those expected to enrol and fight the war, but it affected almost every aspect of the Home Front; it caused food, fuel and raw material shortages, unemployment and it was a largely significant factor in the Tsar losing the support of his key props; those who had supported him in 1905 deserted him in 1917. In addition to this, the Tsar was fully devoted to preserving autocratic rule, but as demand for political reform was increasing, he often reverted to repressive tactics to control this. The Tsar contributed to his own downfall; he was observed as indecisive and plainly incapable of performing the role of autocratic Tsar successfully. His methods dealing with issues also contributed as he often used violence as a tool of control, which although may have worked in the short run, it created a base for discontent to continue growing. Although I believe these two factors to be the most significant, they do not eliminate other important issues; such as the fact that although the Tsar was perhaps incapable, it could be argued that he inherited hundreds of years of resentment, that, arguably, any fully capable Tsar wouldn’t have been able to deal with. There were also a number of factors occurring before the war began in 1914; such as the…

    • 1695 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There were massive socio-economic changes taking place . This created a new class of factory workers . The working class , mostly the peasants - who comprised of 84% of the Russian population - were moved to the city to work in factories . Little could have been done about this as products had to be manufactured in the country , as trade routes were cut off due to WWI . On one hand , due to Tsar Nicholas II autocratic policies, there were no trade unions,to look out workers rights. For that reason living and working conditions were very bad . Workers worked for 14 hours a day and slept in overcrowded lodging houses , as illustrated by Father Gapon in 1905. On the other hand if the workers were treated better , they wouldn't have been so quick to go against the Tsar . His epathy further allienated his…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The peasants made up the bulk of Russia’s population, of whom Tsar Nicholas II had little understanding of. The peasants were severely poor and in debt from the mortgages they were forced to take out after their emancipation in 1861. One of the peasant’s main motives behind their involvement in the 1905 revolution was fear that the government would repossess their homes, as they had fallen behind on their mortgage repayments during economic decline. The peasants wanted reform, and were fed up with paying fees to their landlords etc. These circumstances shaped the majority’s opinions of the tsar and his government, who believed that the tsar was incompetent. However, these views had been held for a long time. The peasants became more dissatisfied with the state as policies were set up in order to speed up Russia’s modernisation.…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the ‘Fundamental Laws of the Empire’, it Is written that “all must bow to the supreme power, not only out of fear but also out of conscience.” This sends a clear message to all that communication with the Tsar is irrefutable and repressive. The social construct of the autocratic system saw the intense disparity of peasants, which made up 82% of the population, and the working class (4%). The Tsarist autocracy gave power to the tsar not only to control all power and wealth, but also control the distribution of it, meaning people were not endorsed by merit. For example, the army’s authority was not assigned based on proficiency or skill, rather on what could be sold or bought. Autocratic Russia was not interested in the improvement of social equity or economic…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Russian revolution was a series of events that changed the political and social way of life that had been in place in Russia for a long time. It all started in March of 1917 when the police found resistance from hungry protestors in the Russian capital of Petrograd. The protest became violent when the people formed mobs and destroyed several police stations. After many deadly confrontations, the resistance became victorious when much of the military defected and joined the cause. Ruler Czar Nicholas II gave up his throne bringing this revolution to an end.…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays