In many countries, good school and medical facilities are available only in cities. Some people think that university graduates who become new teacher and doctors should work in rural areas for a few years. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Huge gap still exist between urban and rural areas in terms of educational and medical facilities. Because of that, some people suggest that newly graduated doctors and teachers should work in bucolic regions. I do not think it is total beneficial for these graduates. Admittedly, sending newly graduated doctors and teachers to rural areas may benefit them mentally. They can fully recognize their responsibility to the society because they will feel pity that the local people are suffering from poor medical and educational services. Also, they will become more independent since they have to face every problem they come across on their own. However, it may cause many problems if these new teachers and doctors are sent to bucolic regions. Firstly, they may feel frustrated because they cannot get accustomed to the local lifestyle. For example, they may find it hard to get used to a place where there is neither a computer nor the internet. Secondly, if they finally adjust to the living and working styles there after a few years, they may not be able to use the advanced facilities when they come back to the cities. As the technology is developing rapidly, the equipments are changing so fast that if new teachers and doctors are away from the urban area for a few years, they will find it hard to use the new equipments. Furthermore, their career path may be affected by their life in rural area because they have to rebuild new career path which are far behind their colleagues when they’re back in cities. Therefore, I would argue that newly graduated teachers and doctors should be given chances to think thoroughly of the advantages and disadvantages before they are sent to the rural areas.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document