Mill’s Utilitarianism
Question. Explain rule utilitarianism. How does it differ from act utilitarianism? Do you think that Mill is a rule utilitarian or act utilitarianism?
John Stuart Mill was one of the greatest philosophers of the 19th century. Mill was best renowned for his idea of “Utilitarianism.” Utilitarianism originated from an ethical principle under Jeremy Bentham, who theorized an action is right if it produces the greatest good for the greatest number of people. Mill revised the concept of utility and has brought forth “the Greatest Happiness Principle. Utilitarianism as a whole is considered to be any moral theory corresponding to which an action is right in and only if it conforms to the principle of utility, or productiveness. Utilitarianism represents an extension into moral theory of an experimental, scientific mode of reasoning because it involves the calculation of causal consequences. According to Bentham, an action conforms to the principle of utility if and only if its performance will be more productive of pleasure or happiness, or more preventive of pain or unhappiness, than any alternative. The well being of individuals is the standard of determining what's right and wrong and the consequences of an action. There are different forms of Utilitarianism, two of which are act-utilitarianism and rule-utilitarianism.
Act utilitarianism is the belief that it is the right action that brings the greatest happiness to the greatest number of people. It is a concept that believes that the morality of an action is determined by its usefulness to most of the people that this act is in accordance with the moral rules since it brings greater good or happiness. Also, act utilitarianism measures the consequences of a single act. Act utilitarianism is the view that the principle of utility should be used to morally evaluate individual acts.
Rule utilitarianism on the other hand is the belief that an action can be morally right if it conforms to the rules that will lead to the greatest good or happiness. It adheres to the belief that the correctness of an action is determined by the correctness of its rules and that if the correct rule is followed, the greatest good or happiness is achieved. Also, the rule utilitarianism measures the consequences of the act repeated over and over again through time as if it were to be followed as a rule whenever similar circumstances arise. Rule utilitarianism is the view that the principle of utility should be used to justify intermediate rules which in turn are used to morally evaluate individual acts.
It is a concept that believes that although following the rules does not always produce the greatest good, not following it will not produce the greatest good either. In the end, rule utilitarianism can become act utilitarianism because when breaking a rule produces a greater good, a sub rule can be made to handle exceptions.
Mill theory was rule utilitarianism. Whether Mill was a rule utilitarian is a matter of controversy, he also argues that it is sometimes right to violate general ethical rules:
… justice is a name for certain moral requirements, which, regarded collectively, stand higher in the scale of social utility, and are therefore of more paramount obligation, than any others; though particular cases may occur in which some other social duty is so important, as to overrule any one of the general maxims of justice. Thus, to save a life, it may not only be allowable, but a duty, to steal, or take by force, the necessary food or medicine, or to kidnap, and compel to officiate, the only qualified medical practitioner
Other things being equal people are happier if their society follows rules so people know what types of behavior they can expect from others in given situations. Therefore utilitarianism can justify a system that goes, "Keep to the rules unless there is a strong reason for breaking them."
To sum up, Act utilitarianism is the belief that an action becomes morally right when it produces the greatest good for the greatest number of people, while Rule utilitarianism is the belief that the moral correctness of an action depends on the correctness of the rules that allows it to achieve the greatest good.
In addition, act utilitarianism is the belief that it is alright to break a rule as long as it brings a greater good or happiness, while Rule utilitarianism is a belief that even if a rule cannot bring a greater good, breaking it will not either.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is Mill A Rule Utilitarian?
I don't believe so. I must begin my argument with two definitions and one assumption. First, Rule Utilitarianism states that right action is defined by whether or not a given action is an instance of a moral rule that tends to maximize utility. Second, Act Utilitarianism states that right action is defined by whether or not a given action maximizes utility. Finally, the Utilitarian Principle holds that right actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness; wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness. I hope that my assumption will be granted as it is taken verbatim from the text. With these notions as a starting point I believe that I can now show Mill to be an act-utilitarian.
The case for Mill being a rule-utilitarian is a strong one. Mill certainly relies heavily on rules in his treatise and argues that they are useful to the point of necessity.
Rule v Act Utilitarianism
• Rule-utilitarianism avoids some problems with act-utilitarianism. For example, with act-utilitarianism we should have to give up television for charity work if it was determined that each of our leisure moments would yield greater social benefit if we did charity work instead.
• With rule-utilitarianism, a rule prohibiting leisure time is not socially beneficial; hence we are not required to abandon leisure for charity.
• Under rule-utilitarianism, enslaving someone would be morally wrong if it was determined that a general rule prohibiting slavery was more socially beneficial.
• Even if an act of enslaving someone produced more benefit for the slave owners than disbenefit for the slave, the act would still be wrong since it would violate the rule prohibiting slavery.
• Rule-utilitarianism creates a new problem: it is conceivable that, on balance, a rule permitting slavery actually produces more benefit for society.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
“The creed which accepts as the foundation of morals, Utility, or the Greatest Happiness Principle, holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness” (11). That quote is from “Utilitarianism” written by John Stuart Mill. Mill is noted in history as a man who pushed for radical change of social and legal principles using Utilitarianism as his guide. That quote sums up his belief in that theory. In this essay I will be discussing Mill, the theory of Utilitarianism and how that theory relates to contemporary ethical issues.…
- 430 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
This theory is a consequentialist based ethical theory which states you must choose the action that increases the total utility. John Stuart Mill was a key proponent of Utilitarianism. Utility is defined as the total happiness or pleasure, minus the total unhappiness or pain involved in the action. Another name for utility is the Greatest Happiness principle. From the definition of utility, pleasure and the absence of pain are the only things desirable as ends in themselves and are the only things that are good.…
- 1730 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Act utilitarianism (AU) is a fairly straightforward theory with an obligation to equality and impartiality. It comprises of mainly utility and disutility, or in simple terms utility equates to happiness or something worth pursuing and disutility equates to unhappiness or…
- 1317 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
Act utilitarians apply the principle of utility directly to different possible acts in a situation to determine which act would probably produce the greatest good; that act is then right and obligatory. Act utilitarians apply the principle of utility directly to different possible acts in a situation to determine which act would probably produce the greatest good; that act is then right and obligatory.…
- 4667 Words
- 19 Pages
Good Essays -
There are obvious problems with both Act and Rule Utilitarianism. Both theories share the common goal of achieving the greatest happiness for the greatest amount of people. However, it is impossible to measure or compare happiness, as one persons happiness may not necessarily be another’s. And how do we measure intangible gain, such as happiness against material gain, such as money? The root principle is a good concept, but it’s the means to which we arrive at the end that cause the problems. In my opinion, there is a greater problem with Act Utilitarianism versus Rule, because it justifies not only ethical but also unethical actions in order to achieve the desired results. It allows for the abuse of people’s rights, demoralizes and devalues the welfare of individuals if it brings enough happiness to the group. The group is nothing more than many individuals coming together to form a whole, and this group would eventually become just a group of demoralized and devalued people who would resort to any means necessary to get what they want because this is what they would be taught to do under the Act theory. This group would raise their children with these same principles, or lack of them, and the cycle would continue, producing a society that was almost egocentric in nature.…
- 480 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Define what act utilitarianism is (your definition should also include a brief description of what utility means vs. disutility).…
- 1277 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Act utilitarianism and Rule utilitarianism are two forms of Utilitarianism. Act utilitarianism is when someone carries out any activity which is beneficial among most people, in spite of the community restrictions (e.g. Laws) as well as individual feelings. Rule utilitarianism is when someone considers Law and is anxious with equality. Anyone who is a rule utilitarian tries to find out what benefits majority through equality.…
- 101 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Mill’s Utilitarianism states that in order to be moral, one must make decisions based upon the greatest happiness. In…
- 918 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Act Utilitarianism is the treatment of each type of moral situation as a unique situation, therefore bring the maximum amount of happiness to everyone that is affected by the act. The agent in these types of situations must determine what is the right things that should be done for this exact situation in present time. The agent must not be bogged down by past experiences, as that will affect the judgment of what to do in this particular situation. While this type of utilitarianism is good in a variety of situation, especially in situations that rarely happen so they require a conclusive determination in judgment, it is hard for people to judge each individual act on an individual basis. It is impractical to have to judge every single action…
- 2060 Words
- 9 Pages
Good Essays -
Utilitarianism can be classified in two distinct ways, act and rule. In these ways the utility principle is applied differently. Act-Utilitarianism is concerned with treating each moral situation as unique; therefore, applied the utility principle to each act. The Fundamentals of Ethics states, “Rule-utilitarianism is the version of rule consequentialism that says that well-being is the only thing of intrinsic value” (Shafer-Landau, Russ G-6). This means rule-utilitarianism draws up general rules based on the utility principle. Furthermore, rules are right if they produce greatest happiness for the greatest number.…
- 616 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Utilitarianism is an ethical theory most often ascribed to the philosopher John Stuart Mill. The utilitarian theory suggests actions and/or intentions are not right or wrong; rather the morality of a choice or act is determined by the outcome or result. Utilitarian’s believe outcomes can be determined in advance of an action and the ethical choice is one which provides the best result or most happiness for the greatest number of individuals (e.g., pleasure, happiness, health, knowledge, satisfaction). The utility theory asserts morality is a means to some other end, it does not stand on its own as being intrinsically moral.…
- 1373 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
This view forms the basis of the contrasting argument between him and Kant .Mill principle of `utility also known as the greatest happiness is that, when people act out of duty it justifies the utilitarian principle as a foundation of morals.It explains that actions are right in proportions and promote overall human happiness of everything or anything that can ;possibly tolerate pain.it focus on the consequence of actions.Not on rights or ethical sentiments.it is best to be cultivated and noble…
- 1231 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
According to Aggabao (2013), act utilitarianism (AU) capture that people must implement that deed that well bring about the greatest benefit for all people who concerned. Act utilitarianism believes that each situation is different from other situations. On other word each situation is unique and non-repeatable. So each individual has to try to avoid about the greatest number of good consequences for greatest number of people in specific situation and time. For example, teachers, who try and make their best to avoid their students…
- 292 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Utilitarianism is a theory of justice whose highest principle is to maximize happiness and utility: “The basic idea of utilitarianism is simple: the right thing to do is what produces the most good” (Mill, 15). The “most good” can be understood in terms of happiness, or the greater amount of pleasure than of pain. Therefore, utilitarians measure the consequences of actions by how much the results bring happiness to the greatest amount of people. The best alternative to any situation is the one that produces the greatest net utility. According to John Stuart Mill, “”Utility” or the “greatest happiness principle” holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness; wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness” (16). Therefore, whatever produces the most good is considered to be just.…
- 583 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
A philosophy that bases the moral worth of an action upon the number of people it gives happiness or pleasure to. A utilitarian philosophy is used when making social, economic or political decisions for the "betterment of society". In utilitarianism, an action is considered to have utility only to the extent that it contributes to the overall good.…
- 702 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays